1. Lao-tzu does not want to give the Tao a name because it has no form
and cannot be named or defined. Tao is in everything and rather than
be considered Taoists, they would prefer to be identified with the
entire universe, and their goal was to be harmonious with it, and
since Tao is considered eternal, they sought to be at one with
eternity. One of the best illustrations of Taoism is wu wei which is
water. Water has no form, therefore it doesn't follow any boundaries,
but at the same time it conforms to the shape of that which surrounds
it, essentially "going with the flow". Nothing is weaker than water,
but at the same time it has immense power. This is what the Taoists
hoped to achieve. Another illustration of the Tao not included in the
article would be the wind. Wind too goes with the flow, while also
fitting into any space it surrounds. Also similar to water is the fact
that wind at times is one of the weakest things in nature, but at
times it too has immense power, like in a tornado. The big difference
between the two is that wind you cannot see, which almost makes it
more in sync with the Taoist beliefs.
2. Wu wei, like I discussed earlier, is a very good illustration of
the beliefs of Taoism. It means water, and it is a way in which
Taoists could merge with the Tao, which also means acting in harmony
with nature. The Taoists don't believe that people should struggle
against nature, rather they should follow them, which water is the
best representation of.
3. If a bird's nest fell out of a tree, I believe a Taoist would not
put it back in the tree. I think this because they would take it as a
part of nature, and by moving the birds nest they would be messing
with nature. It wouldn't be "going with the flow". But this is just my
interpretation, and I would have to ask a legitimate Taoist to see
their response. But again, that wouldn't be accurate because that
would only be one Taoist interpretation and there are many different
interpretations.
4. I think that Taoist would view hunting in general as a completely
horrid thing. I believe for them, killing animals is completely
against nature because animals will die on their own eventually and by
hurrying the process would be completely going against the flow.
Therefore I think hunting regulations would result in mixed results
for the Taoists. While some would discourage them as being boundaries
and laws, others would encourage them because they would be going
against hunting.
5. Confucianism stresses the imperatives of social order and keeps to
the constraints of Confucian duty. Taoism rejects those imperatives
and disregards the constraints of Confucian duties. Also Confucianism
limits its scope to people and their place in society and government,
while Taoism emphasizes the relationship between people and the vast
and resplendent universe. In this way Taoism is complementary to
Confucianism, meaning that it dealt with subjects that Confucianism
ignored. Also the Taoists mocked prescribed values and compulsory
behaviour, which was the basics of Confucianism. Taoism instead
focused on a mind and a behavior that allowed them to be natural and
spontaneous.
6. Taoism may have affected ordinary people in China because it may
have empowered them to break any law, and then use Taoism as their
excuse for doing so. There also may have been some conflict between
the Confucianists and the Taoists because of their conflicting ideals.
While the Confucianists would believe in a strict set of duties and
social orders the Taoists would have been more easy going and natural.
I think at times, like I explained earlier, this philosophy could be
seen as an anti-establishment because people could use it as an excuse
for breaking laws and regulations when really it does not enforce the
breaking of rules, rather the disregard of one's that do not follow
with Taoist beliefs or do not follow nature.