The next auto-quote (sent by free-ware from my commercial-free computer) is:
If real political leaders understood from one end of the Cold War to the other that even one hydrogen bomb was sufficient deterrence, why did they allow the arms race to devour the wealth of the nation while it increased the risk of an accidental Armageddon? In 1982, political scientist Miroslav Nincic examined the economics of the arms race and discovered that it was hardly a race at all; US and Soviet levels of defense spending were only weakly coupled at best. Far more influential on the US side were such domestic political phenomena as competition among the military services, coalitions of scientific and industrial organizations promoting new technologies, the pressure of ``defense'' as a political issue and defense spending to prime the economic pump, particularly in election years.Furthermore, it is my opinion that social media are de facto public utilities; they should have public governance.
(Richard Rhodes in Dark Sun—The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb)
Peter Nightingale
Department of Physics, East Hall
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881, USA