I don't see any receive level specs listed for the RF explorer, the plus model has better accuracy according to the specs.
I just noticed my standard 3G combo shows -99 dBm to -104 dBm on the right antenna but -105 dBm to -114 dBm on the left for an 800 MHz control channel. I'm assuming the 240-960 module is more accurate because of the narrower bandwidth
I keep a dummy load on the left SMA jack to reduce the chance of EM pulses from damaging the receiver so I'm surprised to see this 10 dB difference. At one time there were plans for a zero bandwidth option which might help give a more accurate signal level over the 112 kHz span we have now.
Does your AHJ have any specs on calibration to NIST specs?