Reviewboard upgrade from v2.5.6.1 to v3.0.14

[Gautam Bajaj]

Hi,

We are evaluating for upgrading reviewboard  from v2.5.6.1 to v3.0.14. Our initial queries in doing so:

• Is that version supports High availability (HA) support capability like putting the installation behind the load balancer?
• Can the installation be done on NFS storage location instead of linux VM’s local storage?

Reagrds,

Gautam Bajaj.

[Gautam Bajaj]

Hello,

Can someone please respond to my queries? Usually, what is the response time please as I had put my queries on this forum on June 21, 2019 at 4:02:02 PM UTC+5:30

Thanks,

Gautam.

[Paul Mansfield]

Provided your NFS storage is reliable and highly responsive, I don't see why you shouldn't put the service and the backing database onto an NFS store.

Still, personally, I'd put it onto the fastest storage which is usually local virtual disk, and then ensure that I had good replication of the database set up along with regular db dumps and file backups.

[Gautam Bajaj]

Thanks Paul, will you or somebody be able to comment on my first question that is,

Does reviewboard supports High availability (HA) support capability like putting the installation behind the load balancer that can distribute the load between more than one machine?

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 3:45 PM Paul Mansfield <paul.ma...@agileanalog.com> wrote:

Provided your NFS storage is reliable and highly responsive, I don't see why you shouldn't put the service and the backing database onto an NFS store.

Still, personally, I'd put it onto the fastest storage which is usually local virtual disk, and then ensure that I had good replication of the database set up along with regular db dumps and file backups.

--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/hntVWZiWscs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/cc255d95-48a9-4a4f-92ab-d6ed547cb577%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Christian Hammond]

Hi,

Yes, Review Board works fine behind a load balancer. We do this ourselves for the servers we run (including our SaaS, RBCommons.com). It’s important that you use the same site directory contents across both. NFS works for this, but be mindful of performance (it’s likely going to be much slower to load).

Christian

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAAe58mHmqoY8TVhVhT4usH%3DHyMPeJ37gFD-dfjVrN%2BSWDNmiyQ%40mail.gmail.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

--
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag
Makers of Review Board