|
I would argue that “reuse” has always suffered from an identity crisis more than been ignored as a diversion strategy. It seems that everyone is comfortable using the term “recycling” whether they are reusing a box, bag, paper or ribbon; donating items to charity; buying something that has been upcycled; or driving a used car. I even hear the term “recycling” used when someone captures storm water in a rain barrel. Our society has become very comfortable with the term ‘recycling’ as a catch all for all things environmental. As always, to promote REUSE, we need to create an identity to get folks on board and understand why we want to reuse BEFORE recycling when possible. Our society definitely relies on an integrated waste management system that includes all aspects of the hierarchy. Jack Johnson sure tried to educate about the differences in his song entitled “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle”!
Kind regards, Julie
Julie L. Rhodes
Recycling Economic Development Liaison
Austin Resource Recovery and Economic Dedevelopment | City of Austin
Office 512-974-9235
Cell 317-371-2788
Email Julie....@austintexas.gov
From: reusea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:reusea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Knapp
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:13 PM
To: MaryEllen Etienne
Cc: ReuseAllianceDiscussion Forum; GreenYes Listserve; ZW Communities Yahoo group; ZW Biz Yahoo group; ZWIA Listserve; JTRProfessional...@yahoogroups.com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com; reusealliance-or@googlegroups com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com; reuseall...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [ReuseAlliance] Re: [GreenYes] Even recycling can't cut it ...
Thanks, MaryEllen, but I worry that we reusers might fall into the same error that the EPR advocates used starting about ten years ago: trashing recycling as "enabling" wasting, being "so last-century," "so end of pipe," and so on through a number of dreary and untrue statements that were little more than sound bites. It cost the EPR advocates dearly when people figured out who was the source of all the slurs. The EPR enthusiasts also overreached on policy and implementation, and now their own rhetoric has come back to haunt them as British Columbia proves that some forms of EPR are just a mechanism for diverting more discards to wasting by incineration. A couple of months ago, the leading advocate for EPR in the USA, the Product Policy Institute, rebranded itself, possibly in a bid to escape the notoriety.
We reusers already have superior position on the reduce, reuse, recycle disposal hierarchy to brag about. What we can't reuse, we recycle. We've got lots of strengths that belong to us that we can use.
Repair is essential to reuse. It can be outsourced to the customer, or done in-house by staff. Recycling is necessary at the back end, when the stuff we put out for reuse sale doesn't sell or becomes shopworn or redundant.
That's how Urban Ore keeps the unreusable and unrecyclable material it sends to landfill at less than 2% of what we receive.
Dan Knapp
Urban Ore, Inc., a reuse and recycling materials recovery enterprise in Berkeley, California since 1980.
----
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to greenyes+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Reuse Alliance Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reuseallianc...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Reuse Alliance TX" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reusealliance-...@googlegroups.com.