Re: Star Command - Revolution (1997) By Heroskeep.zip Latest Version
Bueno Wyble
Tonight's broadcast, "Buying the War" introduced you to intrepid Knight Ridder (now McClatchy) reporters Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel, who between them have over 40 years experience reporting on foreign affairs and national security.
Star Command - Revolution (1997) by heroskeep.zip latest version
Download Zip https://shoxet.com/2yMVIC
We apologize but due to your overwhelming response, Jonathan Landay, Warren Strobel and The Moyers Blog staff were unable to log in to the live chat. We will post answers as soon as we are able. Thank you for joining us on air and keep tuned to the blog for more from Landay and Strobel.
Off subject, but:
As I read a story with the headline "Al-Qaeda 'certain' to attack U.S. within months" (washingtonpost.com), it struck me that we never hear statements about homeland security and what part we citizens play in it from the mayors of our cities across this country.
Since every terrorist attack aimed at us, so far, has taken place in a city, shouldn't we consider our cities the front line in our defense against terrorism ?
Why aren't the mayors of America showing the citizens of their cities that they are aware of the dangers of a terrorist attack and giving us level-headed updates and game plans that are not based on panic, but on well thought out organization and common sense ?
The reality of the situation is, the biggest target of terrorism is a small attention span.
I just watched the report on 'Buying the War' and was really taken aback by it. A question that I've had on my mind for some time with regards to journalism, and which I know is one of the fundamental questions in the field, is, is there really such thing as objectivity in journalism? Furthermore, it seems from this report that much of the information conveyed by journalists of the major newspapers is tweaked, doctored and sometimes even manufactured by those journalists or their sources. Is this not in some way the equivalent of an athlete fixing a game or using performance-enhancement drugs? I know this matter raises many moral and ethical issues, but should it not raise a legal one as well? Surely the manufacturing of information leads to far more than an interesting story, and can have massive public ramifications as seen in the report above. By manufacturing information, the people responsible are also manufacturing truth. People have put a lot of faith in their elected officials and the press, and for them to take such gross advantage of that faith and good-will, it should call into question the legality of their actions. Should it not?
Thank you Bill for a thoughtful program with Greenpeace and Friends.They are dedicated activists, who are trying to hold back the tide of environmental disaster. I wish the supported Nader and hope that they will in 2012.Pinning hopes onto a celebrity culture is unfortunately doomed to failure.Obama used the special interests to get elected.
Great story - Look at what the Media has done with the World Trade Center debacle. It points to these Arab Fanatics when if you were to spend any thoughtful time looking at the facts at AE911.com you would find that these 3 buildings could only have come done in the manner that they did by internal explosions with the chemical Thermonite.
Barring all politics, there is no possible explanation for the fast, and ordered descent of all 3 steel structured buildings on 911 than by internal explosions. The physics of this occuring are impossible to avoid. Yet the 911 commission completely avoided ever asking this question.
No steel structured buildings have ever been brought down by fire through out the entire planet yet on 9-11 in NY 3 buildings came down in a perfect descent similar to so many buildings we see on video being demolished with high explosives. How is this possible ? That question has not been allowed to be asked in any "public " debate.
If it was found by examination that all 3 buildings were destroyed by internal-pre-installed explosives our purpose for war and the billions we spend each month would necessarily have to end.
This cannot ever be allowed the light of day !
Bill Moyers rocks. Long may he live and may he keep exposing the crooks for who they are. It's great that PBS carries both NOW, that Moyers started, and his current show. I appreciate having these alternatives on the air. To me, those programs speak more truth to power than the NewsHour.
The video Buying the War is worth watchingbecause it exposes how corrupt the media is.
Bill Moyers was skating on thin ice when he produced Buyingthe War. I think PBS is the only media network that has beenwilling to air this video.
Buying the War documents how the corporations that own themajor Media networks acted in collusion with WE the governmentof the USA, in order to trick WE the people of the USAinto supporting the invasion of Iraq after the 911 atrocity.
Buying the War begins with Bush admitting to theentire press corps that the press conference was scripted andstaged. The reporters laughed but continued to pretend thatthe press conference was the real thing anyway. Everyone presentknew that everyone in the room was part of a farce, and that thepurpose of the entire press conference was to fool the Americanpublic, so that it would support the invasion of Iraq.
Buying the War failed to mention that WE the USgovernment invaded Iraq because both WE the US governmentand our media are in the hands of Jews. If Buying theWar had revealed THIS unpleasantry, Moyers' career would havebeen ruined forever of course. Not even PBS would have aired hisdocumentary. Moyers would have had to get on his knees and begforgiveness like Trent Lott did, not that any Jew would have everforgiven him. Moyers' skillfully avoided this pitfall by blamingthe government for manipulating the owners of the media, insteadof the other way round. Moyers is a Texan who is good atplaying chicken and swerving just in time. Congratulations, Bill,even if you are a liberal.
Because of this perilous subject (the credibility of themainstream media), Moyers had difficulty finding insiders whowere willing to be interviewed for this Buying the Wardocumentary.
Those whom Moyers did interview were so good that they barelycracked a liar's smile as they went along with Moyers' deceptivecoverup. I admired their acting skills and ability to look eachother in the face knowingly without outright laughing at eachother.
Dan Rather has over 25 years experience as a reporter, so wasable to go along with Moyers' ruse perfectly. Reckless Ratherskated about as breathtakingly close to the truth (that Jews ownmost of the media) as any reporter could, without being editedout of the video.
Dan Rather might still be mad at his former Jewish bosses, butknows that if he mentioned that they are Jews, he might becommitted to an insane asylum and never heard from again. Ratheris a good Texas boy, but has not forgotten being beaten to a pulpby mystery men.
Buying the War is a convincing cover up of therole Jews played in engineering the invasion of Iraq. It makesboth Bill Moyers and PBS look like daring heroes who exposed thebad guys, although they actually did the opposite. Ifyou want to know who your real masters are, then ask who it isthat cannot be criticized.
Both Moyers and PBS are in the pockets of Jews, and push theagenda of the Jews, just like most of the rest of the media, ofcourse.
As much as I enjoy watching Nova, Nature, Frontline andscientific and historical programs, I do not donate to PBSbecause I do not want to fund its hate inciting and racist anti-WhiteBlack History Month and Holocau$tpropaganda.
I suspect that professional propagandists admire Buying theWar for its skillful propaganda, since few Americans willever see through Moyers' subterfuge.
Information about Buying the War is at
The transcript of Buying the War can be read at
The video (and audio for dial-up access) of Buying the Warcan be seen at _btw1-1.html
If you want to watch Buying the War on your TV, I think itwill be aired several more times during PBS' March, 2008 fundraising campaign.
Democracy Now of Feb. 29th(archive available) in a interview with Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard economist Linda Bilmes reports that the actual costs of the occupation of Iraq have now topped THREE TRILLION DOLLARS with about 4,000 U.S. personnel killed and at least 60,000 permanently injured (excluding residual PTSD cases).
Due to these facts I'm not too worried about Prince Harry Snowden (nee Hewitt) who is a billion-heir and will not be affected by our taxation slavery. People who go to war must accept the likely prospects, as do those of us who exercise our rights via civil disobedience. Armed Forces personnel, before you return to combat in these criminal actions please consider conscientious objection or sanctuary outside our country until we depose the fascists. Thank you
John Prine wrote 35 years ago "A flag decal won't get you into heaven anymore" but in 2002 if you didn't wave hard enough, you were voted from office, ostracized as soft on terrorism, and agin' us. There were visionaries protesting, but alas they were and are marginalized and many remain outside mainstream media.
Keep Bill Moyers on the air no matter what else is on PBS, even if he's all that's left. He is the only truth-in-news we can absolutely count on in my country, anymore. I say mine because I am a Vet. Especially, thank you Mr. Moyers for "Buying the War"!
CounselorDave
Q. 2. The Democrats seem intent on pushing into the history of how we went to war and some want to prove "He lied and people died." Will the history support that or some more complicated plot where Hussein actually fooled our intelligence services with a clever deception program? Should the Democrats be careful? - gmasters
b1e95dc632