Meeting Today and Update on Budget Items

0 views
Skip to first unread message

pob...@ronintech.org

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 9:59:35 AM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
When: Thursday, 2/18, 11 am PT/2pm ET
Conf bridge: 1-800-727-7709/8359369

Agenda:
1) prioritize currently open trac issues
2) discuss deferred tests

Hi All,

I'd like to give you an update on funding, budget and the direction we
received at our BOD meeting this week.

So far, the budget submitted by the BOD has not been approved. Mark did
say that we had funding to proceed immediately on the following compliance
items:
1) defects/bug fixes
2) deferred tests

During Mark's NAR Report, he informed the BOD that he would like RETS to
take a different technological direction. To that goal, version 1.8 which
will incorporate the outstanding RCPs would be targeted as the last 1.x
release.

Mark envisioned that 1.8 servers would be in the market for another 3-5
years. To that end, NAR is committed to fixing defects and supporting the
server compliance testing tool. However, our scope of new functionality
would be limited; new tests for 1.8 would only cover "MUSTS"; there would
be no new tests for optional functionality.

We were directed by Mark that the following items would as such not be
funded:
1) Compliance tests for the Update specifications, as the implementation
of Update is optional.
2) Re-architecture of the compliance tester to make it possible to add
tests non-programmatically.
3) Client testing tool.

I look forward to talking with you all this afternoon, so we can begin to
get our open TRAC issues resolved.

Best,

Paula

Libor Viktorin

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 10:15:29 AM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Paula,

Could you give us any clue about the " different technological direction
"?

LV

******************************************************************************************
This message may contain confidential or proprietary information intended only for the use of the addresses(s) named above or may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete the original message and any copies immediately thereafter.
*******************************************************************************************

Hi All,

Best,

Paula

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "RETS Compliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to rets-co...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rets-complian...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rets-compliance?hl=en.

pob...@ronintech.org

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 10:19:09 AM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com

pob...@ronintech.org

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 10:21:46 AM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Libor,

The BOD has not seen any details yet, but if you look at the March RETS
agenda, Mark will be doing a presentation on this topic during the general
session.

There is also the newly formed R&D group where I expect many of these
directions will get developed.

Mark Lesswing

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 11:08:21 AM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Libor,

I made a presentation at the BOD this week that noted the following:

1) Great progress had been made implementing the 1.X version of RETS

2) The 1.X specification was originally developed in 1999

3) It would be wrong to stop the 1.8 process because so many great additions to the standard were submitted as RCPs.

I then talked about the future. Perhaps now is the time to take a look at the needs, players and tools that face the industry. We will probably find that some of the assumptions made in 199 have changed. A workgroup was formed (as Paula noted) to start investigating the landscape before any decisions are made. The R&D workgroup will begin by examining the stakeholders and documenting their motivations and common business use cases. I believe that 2010 is the year that RESO should invest in examining what lies ahead for the next decade.

The changes that will be incorporated in RETS 1.8 will still require documentation, implementation and compliance changes. RESO recognizes this fact.

The R&D Workgroup is a prudent business path and hopefully their work can provide the basis for our next steps.

--
Mark Lesswing
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
National Association of REALTORS
312.329.8273
http://blog.realtors.org/crt

Sergio Del Rio

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 2:26:14 PM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Did this call not happen?

Nobody appears to be on the bridge...

Regards,
Sergio Del Rio
Templates 4 Business Inc.

Rob Overman

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 2:26:45 PM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Come late tot he party and you miss it. :)


Rob Overman
CTO and Vice President of New Technology
LPS Real Estate Group


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Sergio Del Rio <Sergio....@t4bi.com> wrote:
Did this call not happen?

Nobody appears to be on the bridge...

Regards,
Sergio Del Rio
Templates 4 Business Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: rets-co...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rets-co...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of pob...@ronintech.org
Sent: February-18-10 7:22 AM
To: rets-co...@googlegroups.com

Sergio Del Rio

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 2:32:54 PM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com

Geez!  I was expecting that to be a long call!

 

Regards,

Sergio Del Rio

Templates 4 Business Inc.

 

Andrew Tillman

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 2:55:29 PM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Complaiance Meeting Call Feb 18th, 2010

Attendees
Andrew Tillman
Paula O'Brien
Kristen Carr
Chris McKeever
Libor Viktorin
Rob Overman
Troy Davisson
Paul Stusiak
Shawn Meissner
Rick Herra


Agenda,
Prioritize Track issues and deferred tests from last year

Discussed ways to do data level compliance testing.

Action Items
- Get list of outstanding issues to Hitachi so they can make a contract.
- Paula will send out a list of the dropped tests from the tester.

Libor Viktorin

unread,
Feb 18, 2010, 2:57:58 PM2/18/10
to rets-co...@googlegroups.com
Based on our discussion, I have added the MaxLength ticket - #109.

LV

******************************************************************************************


This message may contain confidential or proprietary information intended only for the use of the addresses(s) named above or may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete the original message and any copies immediately thereafter.
*******************************************************************************************

--

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages