collection helper bug?
SMiX
attribute to the xml tag and after parsing client mistakenly thiks
that my data is a Hash but must be array. Here is an example:
https://gist.github.com/716580
The probles is partially resolving by using respond_to without
template but it is very bad to show passwords hashes to api users.
Guilherme Silveira
You are right, by default Restfulie + Tokamak is not adding the
type="array" when rendering an array in order to be Rails-agnostic (a
resource representation should not depend on Rails's standards to be
understood: the type="array" is a Rails thing, not a xml one).
But as you mentioned it does not help if you are using it on the client side.
We can change this behavior by updating the members method here:
https://github.com/caelum/restfulie/blob/master/lib/restfulie/common/converter/xml/builder.rb
So the members method would attach a type="array" attribute, what do you think?
Regards
Guilherme Silveira
Caelum | Ensino e Inovação
http://www.caelum.com.br/
SMiX
params like `member` method for ability to define tag attributes like
<object attr="val">
What do you think?
On 26 ноя, 17:40, Guilherme Silveira
> Hi there,
>
> You are right, by default Restfulie + Tokamak is not adding the
> type="array" when rendering an array in order to be Rails-agnostic (a
> resource representation should not depend on Rails's standards to be
> understood: the type="array" is a Rails thing, not a xml one).
> But as you mentioned it does not help if you are using it on the client side.
>
> So the members method would attach a type="array" attribute, what do you think?
>
> Regards
>
> Guilherme Silveira
Guilherme Silveira
Sure. It makes sense, do you want to suggest a way to invoke the
method? We can do it. Only for xml based representations ? Does it
make sense for json?
Regards
Guilherme Silveira
Caelum | Ensino e Inovação
http://www.caelum.com.br/