Most simple way to define useful tests
22 views
Skip to first unread message
André Miranda Moreira
Aug 6, 2014, 4:30:00 AM8/6/14
to res...@googlegroups.com
What would be the thing that would be more meaningful in testing? Any code that's already made?
Mark Evenson
Aug 6, 2014, 8:17:08 AM8/6/14
to res...@googlegroups.com
On Aug 6, 2014, at 10:30, André Miranda Moreira <andrem...@gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the thing that would be more meaningful in testing? Any code that's already made?
One of the problems I have with testing RESTAS is the lack of a generic method for specializing RESTAS:GENURL et. al. without explicitly passing a dynamic binding. This seems like a common enough use case to start with.
--
"No, this is not a disentanglement, but a progressive /knotting-into/."
"No, this is not a disentanglement, but a progressive /knotting-into/."
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages