Thanks for your input Marie!
If you want SRI to participate in future SURF EXPOS you could always
ship everything to me in New Smyrna Beach - the shark bite capitol of
the world!
Yes, SURF EXPO is a trade show for all people in the ocean sports
business, Too bad the diving community is not embracing them. I think
it would be good to have a State of the Oceans booth whereas we could
distribute summit participants information to the trade - as we tried
to do to the DEMA trade members.
But as for the actual summit, I think it is a long way to travel - for
our international friends - for a one day event. If we held it in Key
Largo we could expand the program and people could visit for 3 to 5
days or more, thus justifying the time and expense?
As for the $175k, this is TDC (Tourism Development Council) money that
is already earmarked for tourism advertising. These funds are
generated from the "head & bed" taxes and can ONLY be spent to lure
tourist to the Keys. I agree it would go a long way to fund
environmental programs but I guess the next best thing we can be happy
for is - it is being used to promote a very cool eco-event. You can
see what we are putting together at
www.FloridaKeysEcoWeek.com or
follow us in Facebook.
Thanks for your years of support and encouragment!
Richard
On Jul 28, 1:31 pm, Marie Levine <
srilev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Surf Expo is for the surf industry, not the surfing community, and they are
> the people we need to reach - but with no consumer shows (like BTS) Surf
> Expo may be next best..
>
> The Summit could be held at Surf Expo in January. SRI exibited there in Jan
> 2009 and was very well-received -- much more so than at DEMA. Although Surf
> Expo didn't charge us for the booth (a terrific corner booth), the Orange
> County Convention Center charged max rates for everything - that of shipping
> the booth, brochures, and bringing staff/their hotels/meals made it too
> expensive for us to do itagain in August 2009 ...but the surf industry was
> warm and welcoming except for the biggest manufacturers who, like the dive
> manufacturers, ignored everybody except shop owners.
>
> The other option sounds fine too - but $175,000 would go a very long way in
> conservation and better spent on conservation/education programs where it
> would do max good, than advertising where returns are questionable.
>
> Warmly,
> Marie
>