ResourceSync

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > Hi all, > >

Dear all Happy 2014! ResourceSync is off to a good start with the release of the Notification spec

Hi all The below is relevant re the ongoing discussion about using ResourceSync for RDF, linked data.

For many years, RDF synchronization has been a topic in research. For example, there is RDFSync http:

hi all, The slides used at the ResourceSync tutorial at the LITA Forum, this past Sunday, are now

I'm having a bit of a catch-up on messages I've parked until I can give them fuller attention

Hi Simeon, I agree pretty much with your analysis. But I've never been a great fan of

Thanks for that feedback, Martin! Just wait until your colleague sees the push spec that we hope to

Herbert, Martin and I have revised section 12.7 based on the feedback in this thread. It now says

Thanks for all this Graham. Herbert and I spent some time going through you corrections and

This was fixed in the revision I just pushed out (dated 21 August). http://www.openarchives.org/rs/

Hi all, I have pushed out updates to ResourceSync v0.9.1 based on feedback received and a number of

I pushed some minor updates to the 0.9.1 core specification at http://www.openarchives.org/rs/0.9.1/

Hi all, A quick update from the Repository Fringe: Unfortunately my ResourceSync presentation was

On 17/07/2013 20:47, Herbert van de Sompel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Simeon Warner

I support the proposal Martin outlined below. Cheers, Simeon On 7/8/13 3:41 PM, Martin Klein wrote:

There doesn't seem to be support for my position on not using Capability List Indexes because of

Just want to add a "me too" here, I'm happy with the text and it resolves my original

I support Rob's argument that we should not require <lastmod> to be the same/consistent for

I pushed out two small changes: 1. the TOC page [1] now links to the tutorial slides on slideshare [2

On 7/16/13 2:36 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the

In addition to the tutorial mentioned in Peter's post, I gave a "24x7" presentation on

On 08/07/2013 16:23, Robert Sanderson wrote: > Just to be clear, the agreement is that the index

On 08/07/2013 16:01, Robert Sanderson wrote: > Hi Graham and all, > > The Source should have

hi Martin, all, My preference is for the introduction of @at as it avoids possible confusion,

On 28/06/2013 21:49, Martin Klein wrote: > This is more for clarification than a real issue, I

Hi, This is the first of a series of emails to the list. We have separated issues raised in the last

fwd'ing Graham's msg to the group ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Graham Klyne

On 26/06/2013 19:17, Simeon Warner wrote: > > I've finally found a little time to look into

Hi Simeon, Following up on just a few points... On 26/06/2013 16:36, Simeon Warner wrote: > This