Skipping single test class from buck test in 2.9
22 views
Skip to first unread message
Dariusz Luksza
Jan 15, 2015, 3:08:23 PM1/15/15
to repo-discuss
We experienced recently random test failures in our 2.9 based internal
build especially with lucene.
Is it possible to exclude single test class in `buck test`?
Does anybody else has same problem?
--
Best regards
GSM: +49 017 445 41235
Blog: http://luksza.org http://javablog.pl
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/dariuszluksza
build especially with lucene.
Is it possible to exclude single test class in `buck test`?
Does anybody else has same problem?
--
Best regards
GSM: +49 017 445 41235
Blog: http://luksza.org http://javablog.pl
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/dariuszluksza
David Ostrovsky
Jan 15, 2015, 3:21:10 PM1/15/15
to repo-d...@googlegroups.com
Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 21:08:23 UTC+1 schrieb Dariusz Łuksza:
We experienced recently random test failures in our 2.9 based internal
build especially with lucene.
Is it possible to exclude single test class in `buck test`?
Does anybody else has same problem?
Sounds like you have flaky query test problem, that was fixed here: [1].
Dariusz Luksza
Jan 15, 2015, 3:24:17 PM1/15/15
to David Ostrovsky, repo-discuss
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:21 PM, David Ostrovsky
<david.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 21:08:23 UTC+1 schrieb Dariusz Łuksza:
>>
>> We experienced recently random test failures in our 2.9 based internal
>> build especially with lucene.
>>
>> Is it possible to exclude single test class in `buck test`?
>>
>> Does anybody else has same problem?
>
>
> Sounds like you have flaky query test problem, that was fixed here: [1].
Thanks for quick response David, will verify this tomorrow :)
<david.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 21:08:23 UTC+1 schrieb Dariusz Łuksza:
>>
>> We experienced recently random test failures in our 2.9 based internal
>> build especially with lucene.
>>
>> Is it possible to exclude single test class in `buck test`?
>>
>> Does anybody else has same problem?
>
>
> Sounds like you have flaky query test problem, that was fixed here: [1].
> [1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/61040
>
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe, email repo-discuss...@googlegroups.com
> More info at http://groups.google.com/group/repo-discuss?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Repo and Gerrit Discussion" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to repo-discuss...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Dariusz Luksza
Jan 19, 2015, 3:49:49 AM1/19/15
to David Ostrovsky, repo-discuss
Can confirm that this patch also fixes flakiness of Lucine tests in
2.9 after cherry-picking it from 2.10/master. There is no
'--no-results-cache' option yet through, since 2.9 is using older buck
version. Thanks again David!
btw. Another flaky test for is the Gerrit GC, was it also improved later on?
2.9 after cherry-picking it from 2.10/master. There is no
'--no-results-cache' option yet through, since 2.9 is using older buck
version. Thanks again David!
btw. Another flaky test for is the Gerrit GC, was it also improved later on?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages