SCRRBA responds to TASMA move to assume oversite of 440 band in Southern California‏

[WA6ARC]

A lot of nonsense flying around.

I won’t bore you all with copies of the silliness messages

The coordinator reflector has a couple messages posted there that were
pretty far off the mark. A copy of my reply is below. I did NOT copy
the 3
pages of he said she said nonsense so you don’t have to wade through
that
stuff here.

SCRRBA and NARCC have NO new issues. That one is really off the wall.
SCRRBA and NARCC do things differently, but so what? We have settled
into
a stable working relationship that's decades old. Neither of us has
any
need to meddle in the others business.

There are some miss-guided individuals playing with TASMA politics.
For the
sake of the TASMA organization and their constituents, I hope those
folks
don’t ruin that organization while playing their games.

===
Sent to Coordinator reflector
=========
Rumors and miss-information are amazing things that take on a life of
their
own

SCRRBA VS NARCC

There ISN'T any VS!
Whatever differences we have are very old hat. NARCC does what it
needs to
do to take care of its business, SCRRBA does what it needs to do to
take
care of its business, and neither is interested in hassles, and non
productive commotion, especially silliness about band plans. We have a
stable working relationship that's been in place for decades.

End of subject

TASMA? They are the TWO METER Spectrum Management Association. SCRRBA
has
not the slightest interest in two meter issues, and even less interest
in
becoming involved with their internal politics. They seem to do what
the
two meter folks want, and SCRRBA hasn't the slightest desire or right
to
meddle in their business. Some miss-guided individuals may think that
they
should manipulate TASMA into doing things it has no right to do. Those
folks will pay the price for that error, sooner or later.

Robin Critchell, WA6CDR
SCRRBA Chief Coordinator