Relativity skeptics

You have membership. Have your comments not been posted? I haven't had time for this forum lately

A. General relativity explains Mercury's anomalous perihelion advance and the bending of light by

Not dealing with this Saturday- But one of the areas that does not make sense with what relativity

Went to an interesting talk yesterday -> talk said that black holes emit water -> of course

All The illusion of time dilation Michelson-Morley's tests regard a second order effect of the

add on: so when say ->" In addition to possessing more conceptual clarity, Albert Einstein

Laurene If one drops a stone in a river, the orientation of the wavefront stays the same, but the

To all, I present a new, comprehensible version of the two significant errors in physics: Three

no comma ------ Original Message ------ From: "Laurence Clark Crossen" <lccsirius@gmail.

Laurence Your statement about the delay due to the stream is valid only due to a tacit assumption

According to the accepted historiographical account of the development of relativity, Einstein

>>Maybe I should worship Einstein too!<< People have found that the easiest option- they

Laurence As I said: the postulate is easily defined with the correct definition of parallelism as

The most ridiculous science mistake in history. The null result of MMX disproved the ether. The

Underwood Dudley's book, Mathematical Cranks, has a whole chapter on attempted proofs of the 5th

https://ia902302.us.archive.org/19/items/sim_mathematics-magazine_november-december-1931_6_3_0/

Antonio Leon "New Elements of Euclidean Geometry" Revised 2023 "Apparent Relativity

Two new relativity discussion groups. "npa-relativity" = https://groups.google.com/g/npa-

Callahan p. 161 on Riemann: "a translation made by a close follower of Riemann... It is such

Callahan, "Euclid or Einstein?" p.59= "non-Euclidean geometry is not a brilliant

If we suppose that light in the vacuum of space moves like a particle, sharing the speed of its

Albrecht Giese Friday 11th of August https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMxJvCtkhz0&t=2s

Callahan page 285: "only another example of the lack of clearness of conception and love of the

List of scientists finding relativity ridiculous: 1. Rutherford. 2. Essen. 3. Callahan. 4.

In many ways Callahan shows (as in the above example) that the geometry of relativity involves

For example, p.236 "But there is no use expecting Einstein to reason." On Tuesday, February

I have had this book on my shelf for years without reading past the preface because the geometry is

Article by Edward Dowdye= "Abstract: Findings show that the gravitational deflection of

Without defending illogical reasoning, that is.