Relativity is muddled nonsense: Callahan "Euclid or Einstein?"

[Laurence Clark Crossen]

p.222 "he is himself struggling to give, in a hazy way, some kind of reality to his mathematics by clothing his formulae with some interpretation or other....clarity ends, and we step into a region of mistiness and fog. We certainly cannot consider Einstein as one who shines as a scientific discoverer in the domain of physics, but rather as one who in a fuddled sort of way is merely trying to find some meaning for mathematical formulae in which he himself does not believe too strongly..."

[Laurence Clark Crossen]

I have had this book on my shelf for years without reading past the preface because the geometry is unmistakable nonsense on just two grounds or three. First, a physics model cannot explain causation when it involves reification fallacy as curved space does. Second, time is not a spatial dimension so it is meaningless diagramming of time as a dimension that is pointless. Third , this geometry cannot rescue SR from the false claims that time dilates and space contracts. These are just mathematical lies to artificially keep the speed the same. It is unnecessary because the medium determines the speed not lying math.