The geometry of special and general relativity has been deconstructed and disproven by Callahan.
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Laurence Clark Crossen
unread,
Feb 28, 2024, 2:08:42 PM2/28/24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Relativity skeptics
For example, on page 254 he shows that Einstein claimed his space was an ether without mechanical or kinematical qualities that can produce mechanical and kinematical properties.
Laurence Clark Crossen
unread,
Feb 28, 2024, 2:12:44 PM2/28/24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Relativity skeptics
In many ways Callahan shows (as in the above example) that the geometry of relativity involves reification fallacy so it cannot explain causation. It only pretends to explain them. One can make a mathematical model involving reification fallacy yet it cannot explain causation.