Mcculloch Pro Mac 610 Manual Shop

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Vilma Steiert

unread,
Jul 13, 2024, 4:24:13 PM7/13/24
to rejesfonol

The McCulloch MC1385 Deluxe Canister Steam System is a multi-purpose steam cleaner, great for cleaning and mopping. Using ordinary water heated to over 200ºF, the MC1385 effectively and naturally cleans and sanitizes a wide variety of surfaces. Includes 23 versatile accessories. Variable steam control, up to 58 psi makes MC1385 great for blasting away grease and grime. Backed by a 2-year warranty and supported in Andover, Kansas. With over 50 years of experience in the design and manufacture of outdoor power equipment, McCulloch has established an unrivaled reputation for design, reliability, and value in a wide range of outdoor, garden and workshop products.

Mcculloch Pro Mac 610 Manual Shop


Download https://urlgoal.com/2yWWej



Upon payment for this item you will be emailed access to an instant download of the file in Adobe .pdf format. These files can be quite large so purchasing over a dial-up connection is not recomended. We do not have the printing capabilty to print this and send it to you through the mail. When checking out, please select "Manual Download", shipping $0.00. We do not have the capability of printing or mailing these service manuals.

129 page factory workshop manual covers: General information: warranty, factory authorized parts, 10hr tune up. Your shop: how to clean your work area, tools and equipment. Troubleshooting and testing. General service, guide to assembly and disassembly. Specific service: clutch guard, bar and chain, frame, muffler, clutch, sprocket drum and bearing. Ignition system: fan housing, starter, switch, sawdust guard, flywheel and pawl, ignition system coil points and condenser. Fuel system: fuel and oil tank assemblies, oiler system, air box and reed valve, carburetor assembly. Starter assembly, clutch assembly, transmission. Powerhead assembly: piston, cylinder, crankshaft, rod and bearings. Fuel and lubricants. Specs.

Programme: Tuesday, July 24th. All sessions of July 24th in the North Street Baptist Church. (North Street. near Saratoga.) Morning Session at 9 o'clock. Prayer. Address of Welcome: His Honor, Mayor Latrobe; His Excellency, Governor Brown; Prof. E B. Prettyman, State Superintendent of Education; John T. Morris, Esq., President of School Board, Baltimore City; Prof. Henry A. Wise, Superintendent of City Public Schools; Prof. John McChan. Assistant Superintendent; Rev A.W. Wayman. D.D., Bishop A.M.E. Church; Prof. Joseph N. Lockeman, Morgan College; Rev. Harvey Johnson, D.D., Pastor North Street Baptist Church; E.J. Waring, Esq., Member of Baltimore Bar, in behalf of the citizens of Baltimore.

Responses: James M. Gregory, A.M., President of the Association; Rev. D.J. Saunders, D D., President Biddle University. Charlotte, N.C.; I.E. Page. A.M., President Lincoln Institute, Jeffercon City. Mo.; G.W. Hayes, President Virginia Seminary, Lynchburg. Va.; W.H. Councill, President State Normal and Industrial School, Normal. Ala: Rev. C.H. Parrish, A.M., President Eckstein-Norton University, Cane Spring. Ky.; Rev. Isaac Clark, Professor Theological Department, Howard University, Washington, D.C.; Rev. B.W. Arnett, D.D.; Bishop A.M.E. Church, Wilberforce, Ohio.

Afternoon Session: Poem, Mrs. F. E. W. Harper; Philadelphia, Pa Address, Rev. L.J. Coppin, A.M., D.D., Philadelphia, Pa Study of Folklore, Mrs. A.J. Cooper, A.M., Washington, D.C. Address, Bishop B.T. Tanner, D.D. Has the Colored Author a Distinctive to the Century? Prof. E.A. Johnson, LL B, Raleigh, N.C. Election of Officers. Adjournment.

Mr. Grandison thought he ought to defend the ministry against the assaults of Mr. Kelly Miller last evening. Said to say that God called poor men was to say God did not know what he was doing. Bishop of Canterberry led the crusade for magna charta and ministers were in the forefront of many battles. When the teachers have done what ministers have then they can talk. Close up churches and he would not give a bagatelle for life in Baltimore.

Mrs. Fannie Jackson Coppin was then introduced and spoke on the subject of industrial education. She stated that America had borrowed her ideas of industrial schools from Europe. Men of America had thought about this plan but couldn't see how the work-shops could be brought into the school room, and it was not till the Prussian System was seen did the Philadelphia schools take up the work. Models were brought from St. Petersburg such as could be seen in the high schools of Baltimore. The American workshops are filled with imported workmen because America has so few industrial schools. It is easier to get a colored boy into a lawyer's office than into a blacksmith shop. Education of the present day teaches what to see and what not to see. When we get enough colored men of trades we can control and the unions will admit colored men when they find it necessary.

The committee reports with much gratification the exhibit of the colored manual training school of Baltimore, established Sept. 5, 1892; considering that this school has only been in operation two years and considering the difficulty of establishing industrial work we think the exhibit very creditable to pupils and teachers. Carpentry, wood carving, smithing, drawing and wheel-wrighting form an admirable basis for a training that is of the utmost importance to the colored youth of the country. It is of the highest importance that the academic studies should be pursued at the same time as the manual training. The papers in arithmetic, algebra, geometry, physics, physiology, and geography show creditable advancement in these studies.

In the country where the youth of to-day are to be the voters of the next, it is highly important that they should become acquainted with those principles regulating commercial intercourses which they may have to decide upon in the legislation of the country at any time. How many of those now engaged in arranging a tariff for the country ever studied these questions in school or college? The rights of labor and capital, too, ought to be taken by every student in a manual school, he would then be prepared to judge intelligently when these questions meet him in the work-shop or labor union.

Howard University takes the lead in the variety of her exhibits in manual training and scientific departments. The exhibit in mathematical and mechanical drawings are creditable, and is as it ought to be from objects. The specimens of elementary work in carpentry are creditable. Quite a good specimen of a steamship by one of its ambitious students gives good promise of a future ship builder. Useful and practical work in the tin shop is noticed. Printing, perhaps the greatest of all arts, is conspicuous by its specimens of printed music which any of our music stores would consider well done. The specimens of sewing, art needle work and dress-making all done by hand are of the most finished character, reflecting credit upon the students and their teachers. We note with pleasure some fine specimens of photography in which the college grounds and buildings are exhibited. Quite a selection of well bound books represent the book bindery department.

The committee feels deprived of the privilege in not having the time to speak specifically of the display which Howard makes of its facilities for teaching science, as shown in the chemical and natural history division. Surely Howard University is a well rounded institution. She shows excellence from her work shops through her whole curriculum, to her doctors of medicine and interpreters of law. If the committee has omitted to give praise where praise is due it is simply from a want of time. The whole exhibit is of the most encouraging character from the primary department to the highest, and give fine promise of what will yet be accomplished as time advances and opportunities increase.

Our tenth item. What part of the amount expended for Negro education has he paid himself? In our report of 1892, at Washington, I made the mistake of putting the amounts raised by the distinctively race churches with those paid in by black members of other churches which made the record better for the blacks of mixed membership on the question of racial educational support. The fact is that the distinctive race churches should have all the credit for the great work they are doing educationally. The A.M.E. Church should have credit for entire self-support, amounting to $66.335.64; the A.M.E.Z. Church for a $22,000; the C.M.E. Church for a probable $5,000 out of the expenditure of $7,000, which gives the M.E. Church, South, the credit of $2,000. The Negro paid in tuition at the A.M.E. all told $38,000. The report shows $48,800.91 in round figures. Using the payment of $2,174.40 into the treasury for benevolent purposes and deducting the tuition of some white schools, which is small, we figure that $38,000 is about the amount the Negro paid out of an expenditure of $200,000. The A.B.H.M. Society reports the $13,202 was reported to them as money paid out by the Negro himself to teachers in the 15 schools managed by Negro trustees. This amount with tuition $26,239.32 would give an approximation of $39,441.34 within a few hundred dollars of forty thousand. The Negro in the Presbyterian Church, North, contributed to educational support last year $32,707.99. The Negro in the M.E. Church contributed not over $20,000 last year by collections. By tuition and miscellaneous gifts they will doubtless have to their credit $30.000. making a total of $50,000 of the $262,344.14 which has been expended on them educationally. The contribution of $20,000 by 16 conferences averaging a little above $1,200 per conference is about $6 1/2 for every Negro member of the church, and yet some Negroes have left the church, more are to go we learn, and some few will forever 004949grumble. It is a deviation, but I am compelled to say that it makes the big man small when he argues that the Negroes in the M.E. Church ought to leave the church because one man isn't elevated when such elevation would be no direct benefit to the masses. No one gainsays that the lavishment annually of nearly twenty times as much upon the Negro as he gives educationally is not benefitting the masses and likewise entitles Bishop Foster's view on this question to thoughtful consideration. The Southern Presbyterian Church reports no contributions for Negro membership, nor does the United Presbyterian Church.

aa06259810
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages