Un Ece Regulation 10
Lane Frisch
The data protection package adopted in May 2016 aims at making Europe fit for the digital age. More than 90% of Europeans say they want the same data protection rights across the EU and regardless of where their data is processed.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. This text includes the corrigendum published in the OJEU of 23 May 2018.
The regulation is an essential step to strengthen individuals' fundamental rights in the digital age and facilitate business by clarifying rules for companies and public bodies in the digital single market. A single law will also do away with the current fragmentation in different national systems and unnecessary administrative burdens.
Directive (EU) 2016/680 on the protection of natural persons regarding processing of personal data connected with criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data.
The directive protects citizens' fundamental right to data protection whenever personal data is used by criminal law enforcement authorities for law enforcement purposes. It will in particular ensure that the personal data of victims, witnesses, and suspects of crime are duly protected and will facilitate cross-border cooperation in the fight against crime and terrorism.
The GDPR procedural regulation aims to streamline cooperation between data protection authorities (DPAs) when enforcing the GDPR in cross-border cases. It supplements the GDPR in a targeted way by specifying procedural rules to be followed by DPAs when applying the GDPR in cases which affect individuals in more than one Member State.
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) is an independent European body which shall ensure the consistent application of data protection rules throughout the European Union. The EDPB has been established by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
The EDPB is composed of the representatives of the national data protection authorities of the EU/EEA countries and of the European Data Protection Supervisor. The European Commission participates in the activities and meetings of the Board without voting right. The secretariat of the EDPB is provided by the EDPS. The secretariat performs its tasks exclusively under the instructions of the Chair of the Board.
The EDPB tasks consist primarily in providing general guidance on key concepts of the GDPR and the Law Enforcement Directive, advising the European Commission on issues related to the protection of personal data and new proposed legislation in the European Union, and adopting binding decisions in disputes between national supervisory authorities.
Regulation 2018/1725sets forth the rules applicable to the processing of personal data by European Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. It is aligned with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive. It entered into application on 11 December 2018.
Regulation 2018/1725 established a European data protection supervisor (EDPS). The EDPS is an independent EU body responsible for monitoring the application of data protection rules within European Institutions and for investigating complaints.
The European Commission has appointed a Data Protection Officer who is responsible for monitoring and the application of data protection rules in the European Commission. The data protection officer independently ensures the internal application of data protection rules in cooperation with the European data protection supervisor.
The Truck and Bus regulation has been in effect since December 2008 and we are now in the last replacement phase of the regulation with a final deadline of January 1, 2023, to upgrade to 2010 or newer model year engines. Please submit any compliance documentation by emailing a scanned copy or photos of your documents to tru...@arb.ca.gov. Include your TRUCRS ID number, a detailed description of the request, and list any applicable VIN(s). Please do not mail hard copy documentation unless requested by staff. Faxing of documentation is no longer available.
More about this program
The Marihuana Regulation & Taxation Act (MRTA) was signed into law on March 31, 2021 legalizing adult-use cannabis (also known as marijuana, or recreational marijuana) in New York State. The legislation created a new Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) governed by a Cannabis Control Board to comprehensively regulate adult-use, medical, and hemp cannabis. The OCM will issue licenses and develop regulations outlining how and when business can participate in the new industry.
The regulatory process in the State of New York is governed primarily by Article 2 of the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). This process is administered in the Office of Cannabis Management Legal Division.
To initiate a regulatory proposal, SAPA requires submission of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to the Secretary of State for publication in the New York State Register. If no public hearing is required, the notice must precede adoption by at least 60 days (45 days for revised rulemaking). Publication by the Secretary of State is the primary means of giving notice of proposed actions. However, any person or entity may file a standing request to receive notices from the Department directly.
If the text of the proposed notice exceeds 2,000 words, only a description of the subject purpose or substance of the rule will be published in the New York State Register. Similarly, if the text of the Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and/or the Job Impact Statement exceeds 2,000 words a summary is required. To ensure the widest possible and most timely outreach, in conjunction with submission to the Secretary of State, the Office will post the complete version of all regulatory notices on this website.
If you plan to submit a comment on proposed regulations to OCM, there is no specific format or form that is required; any email or letter sent to the address on this page is sufficient. However, the following tips are intended to help you submit a strong comment that will best explain your views and improve the proposed regulations on which you are commenting.
Since the regulation was adopted, the cybersecurity landscape has changed tremendously as threat actors have become more sophisticated and more prevalent, cyberattacks have become easier to perpetrate (such as with ransomware as a service) and more expensive to remediate, and additional cybersecurity controls are available to manage cyber risk at reasonable cost. Moreover, the Department has found, from investigating hundreds of cybersecurity incidents, that there is a tremendous amount that organizations can do to protect themselves. As a result, Part 500 was amended again, effective November 1, 2023.
This Resource Center is designed to help explain how to comply with the Cybersecurity Regulation. Among other things, it provides links to industry guidance, FAQs and provides detailed information on how to submit cybersecurity-related filings, including notifications to DFS regarding compliance, cybersecurity incidents, and exemption status.
This Resource Center is frequently updated, and you may sign up for email updates on important regulatory guidance, cybersecurity alerts, and other information related to cybersecurity in the financial services sector by going to the DFS Email Updates Signup Page and subscribing to Cybersecurity Updates. These emails will come from the email address [email protected].
Yes. Both HMOs and CCRCs are Covered Entities. Pursuant to the Public Health Law, HMOs must receive authorization and prior approval of the forms they use and the rates they charge for comprehensive health insurance in New York. The Public Health Law subjects HMOs to DFS authority by making provisions of the Insurance Law applicable to them. CCRCs are required by Insurance Law Section 1119 to have contracts and rates reviewed and authorized by DFS. The Public Health Law also subjects HMOs and CCRCs to the examination authority of the Department. As this authorization is fundamental to the ability to conduct their businesses, HMOs and CCRCs are Covered Entities because they are "operating under or required to operate under" DFS authorizations pursuant to the Insurance Law, and whether or not they are regulated by another governmental entity is irrelevant to this determination.
Yes, they are considered Covered Entities and, as such, must comply with Part 500. Only the Information Systems supporting the branch, agency or representative office, and the Nonpublic Information of the branch, agency or representative office, are subject to the applicable requirements of Part 500, whether through the branch's, agency's, or representative office's development and implementation of its own cybersecurity program or through the adoption of an Affiliate's cybersecurity program.
A Covered Entity may adopt an Affiliate's cybersecurity program in whole or in part as provided for in Section 500.2(d), as long as the Covered Entity's overall cybersecurity program meets all requirements of Part 500. The Covered Entity remains responsible for full compliance with the requirements of Part 500. To the extent a Covered Entity relies on an Affiliate's cybersecurity program in whole or in part, that program must be made available for examination by the Department.
To the extent a Covered Entity utilizes an employee of an Affiliate or Third-Party Service Provider to serve as the Covered Entity's CISO for purposes of Section 500.4(a), the Covered Entity retains full responsibility for compliance with the requirements of Part 500 at all times, including ensuring that the CISO responsible for the Covered Entity is performing the duties consistent with this Part.
Effective continuous monitoring could be attained through a variety of technical and procedural tools, controls and systems. There is no specific technology that is required to be used in order to have an effective continuous monitoring program. Effective continuous monitoring generally has the ability to continuously, on an ongoing basis, detect changes or activities within a Covered Entity's Information Systems that may create or indicate the existence of cybersecurity vulnerabilities or malicious activity. In contrast, non-continuous monitoring of Information Systems, such as through periodic manual review of logs and firewall configurations, would not be considered to constitute "effective continuous monitoring" for purposes of Section 500.5.
93ddb68554