You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to regmod
Dear Frank,
From my understanding validate doesn’t adjust
our original model parameter estimates, though it does correct for biased
estimates of how good our model is. So the index corrected r2 is a better
representation of the amount of variance explained by our predictors than the
r2 from our original fit? Is it a case of if we have poor validation, we then
go back and change the model? I don’t really understand the difference between
validate and calibrate. Do we need to do both? Would calibrate tune the
original parameter estimates for us and re-fit the model? Or just tell us how much calibration was
performed in the original fit?
Thanks!
Frank Harrell
unread,
Oct 17, 2015, 9:03:38 AM10/17/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to regmod
Neither of these are for tuning parameter estimates. They are for telling you how badly the model is likely to perform on samples from the same stream of subjects.
Both validate and calibrate are generally needed. validate is more aimed at predictive discrimination and calibrate is aimed solely at absolute prediction accuracy.