Keytext Unlock Code Keygen 53
Vanina Mazzillo
We often use key text fields for simple strings in our content. Today we came across an issue where we store HTML for an email template (the Rich Text field doesn't provide enough of the formatting we use so it cannot be used in this instance).
Although this is saved correctly first time, once published and you go back to the page the ="signup_link" is stripped out from the editor, and if you then save again that content is lost entirely. We tried various workarounds for this (including and various others) and all got stripped out.
I recommend that you switch the Key Text for a Rich Text field. It allows much more formatting options. And for this specific case, you can paste this piece of code inside a preformatted tag. It'll be returned in the following form in the API:
We use a content type 'Corporate Newsletter Sign up' to deploy a Microsoft Dynamics Form Embed Code. We use the ' key text ' field to save the code snippet.
The original code snippet looks like this:
The original code is saved in the content and deployed accordingly, but the shortened code snippet is displayed incorrectly and also used when we copy the content to another locale, which leads to the code embed not working in that other localized version.
This is both for my own note consumption, as well as turning in a PDF for credit in course completion. I'm sure I could print from Joplin to PDF and then highlight in my PDF editor, but I'd rather keep it simple and not multiply the effort.
I can see why it doesn't. The act of creating a fenced code block effecively says "What follows is code. Nothing after this point should be treated as markdown or html code that should be rendered". That is what the block is for; to be able to display code without it rendering.
The fenced code block has it's own code highlighter (highlight.js?) but that just colours specific key words within the text itself to make code clearer to read and does not apparently accept any form of additional formatting codes.
I am not a programmer but I cannot see how that is currently possible using Joplin as everything that is enclosed in the fenced code block is apparently not controlled by Joplin, but by the highlighter package Joplin uses.
There are other ways that can be used to highlight the code block like on the web -material/reference/code-blocks/, but maybe Joplin can develop such a feature too, considering that the highlight feature in the code block is very meaningful to us
Alright, here's a new one. I have a 'coming soon' style page where I hide the header and footer as I'm working on this site. However, I have noticed that on mobile, the fonts that I have used the 'scale text' option are super jittery on scroll (just on mobile). I narrowed this down as I tried to removed the scale text option and it worked just fine without bouncing around, however I really want to have these letters scaled to fit the text box for aesthetics. What might be causing this, and how can that be fixed??
Agreed, the jittery problem doesn't happen in Chrome on my iPhone either. Just Safari. Do you know why this would be the case that the 'scale text' would do this just in Safari? Or who I could reach out to see why? It seems like a Squarespace bug that one of their functions wouldn't work properly on a commonly used browser for mobile.
Agreed, the jittery problem doesn't happen in Chrome on my iPhone either. Just Safari. Do you know why this would be the case that the 'scale text' would do this just in Safari? Or who I could reach out to see why? ....
I seem to have found a workaround, it basically involves using some CSS to override the scalable text on the mobile view. It's not a perfect solution, but it works until Squarespace fixes this (or Safari gets better).
So it turns out that this Safari bug happens with not just the "scale text" feature of 7.1, but with lots of css responsive units, including em, rem, etc. (you can see this yourself by using these units in the above code example). I found that for some reason the viewport width (vw) work great and is an exception to this.
Like I said, it is not a perfect or ideal solution, but it works. Might require a lot of tweaking depending on your site / context / use case. Tested on iPhone 13, 1Phone 13 Pro Max, iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max.
I'm having the same problem with the jittery scaled text when viewed on mobile - in both Safari and Chrome. It's a really unfortunate bug - I'm wondering if anyone is still having the same issue? I designed so much of my recent site around the text layout, it's going to be a lot of work to make all these adjustments for mobile. I hate to say it, but with all the bugs in 7.1, it's getting harder to sell this as a solution for my clients needing user-friendly in-house websites.
I try to link my mobile number to my Paypal account but I never receive the confirmation SMS text message that they say has been sent.. My phone number is entered correctly.. My phone number is set to "mobile" in my profile preferences.. I click the "Re-Send" button but I never receive the SMS text message, so I can't enter my confirmation code !!!! I see alot of members are having the same problem but their posts are not getting any replies besides "make sure your phone number is entered correctly" or "make sure your phone number listed in your profile is set to MOBILE". HELLO PAYPAL!!!!! It's the right number and it's set to mobile.!!! So why aren't I getting the text message from you so I can enter my confirmation code????????? And by the way, my carrier is T-Mobile and I have UNLIMITED SMS MESSAGING on my plan... Oh, AND my account is paid up to date.!!!!!!! So please explain to me why I am not getting the confirmation code sent to my mobile phone????
Yes, I too am having the same issue. I was able to get the confirmaiton code for the Security Key, but never have I been able to link up my smart phone w/ my account so that I can receive text messages of my statuses...etc...
Ok, I have a pin on my Android phone. That doesn't help. So,how do I register for a Secuirty Key for my phone? The place that I see the security key requires me to enter that everytime I login to the site... and that **bleep**. I did get the Security Key text, but no other SMS text from the Activation screen.
I managed, like you, to enter a PIN number on my phone and am able to login to PayPal Mobile with the PIN I created, but I have not tested to see whether I can send and receive money via the Mobile App.
This issue must be a big one for PayPal because I have not received any support from them since I started this thread. Keep sharing your experiences so we can hopefully help lots of other people that are having the same problem. I still cannot confirm PayPal mobile on my account because I cannot figure out why I'm not receivng the confirmation text msg to my phone.
I have created triggers that cause the value in text entry boxes to change when a button is clicked. Basically, I have an on screen ten key pad and triggers designed to enter the number of the button clicked into a specific text entry field if set values are true. I've attached examples of the code from three of the buttons here.
For some reason, probably an obvious one, all the entries end up being one no matter which button I press. I know that the text entry fields are suppose to lose focus when a button is pressed, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
When the user clicks Button 1, the value of NumberEntry1 is changed to 1 as it was previously blank. Now the second trigger changes the value of NumberEntry2 to 1 as NumberEntry1 is not blank (it was just changed by the previous trigger) and so it continues down the list of Button 2 triggers until all four variables are changed to a value of 1.
Without having a copy of your file to test, it is a bit difficult to confirm a solution, but you may find that simply reversing the order of your triggers will solve the problem. In other words, set the value of NumberEntry4 first, then NumberEntry3 and so on. That way, none of the values should change until the first blank variable is reached.
The only other thing I would point out, although it won't actually make any difference to how the triggers work, is that you don't actually need all of the conditions that you have placed in your triggers. In order for NumberEntry3, for example, to have a value in it that is not blank, NumberEntry2 and Number Entry1 must already have non-blank values. Therefore, you only need to check the previous variable to see if it is blank.
In case you can't get it to work, I have also attached an example I made a while ago to help someone who was working on a combination lock. I have used four Number variables and, for testing purposes, the correct code to open the lock is accessible by clicking the Correct Code button.
Why I'm doing this? This is just the easiest way to show the problem that I have, that is: when i execute the 'DO' button ActionPerformed event, the database is not necessarily updated. If the update is quick, I find it updated. If it's a bit slow, i find it not yet updated. To simulate this you just need to add a delay in the text Change Script:
Now if you try the example you'll see that the read text is always one step back.
If you type "A" then press "Do", you'll see nothing (or whatever value was in the record with id=1 of the table), but now if you type "B", when you press "Do" you'll see A. And this happens consistently.
The problem is that updating the record triggers some custom logic at the database level. Despite it's executed in the update transaction, it seems like the ActionPerformed event finishes before and so 'sees' the db not yet updated; this is a problem because that logic is infact validation logic that should prevent the further action contained in the button from being executed; this problem makes the application unreliable.
7fc3f7cf58