On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:30:42 -0700 (PDT), DerbyDad03
<
teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 2:36:10 PM UTC-4,
k...@notreal.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:12:57 -0700 (PDT), DerbyDad03
>> <
teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 10:45:43 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >> On 8/18/2022 12:19 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> >> > On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 11:46:11 PM UTC-4, Markem618 wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT), DerbyDad03
>> >> >> <
teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Survey time...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> How close to your miter saw blade do you allow your fingers to get
>> >> >>> while making a cut?
>> >> >> End of the table with the left, right hand is on the switch.
>> >> >
>> >> > So you never cut boards that are shorter than half the table?
>> >> If too short for comfort I put another board on top to hold it.
>> >
>> >Now there's a technique I've seen or even heard of.
>> >
>> >> Never measure but my limit is about 12" or so.
>> >
>> >I would need to put a decimal point between the 1 and the 2.
>> >
>> >What do you think could go wrong that keeps you 12" from the blade?
>> GO wrong? Stupid mistake. Not thinking. Distraction (and if you say
>> that you're never distracted when your attitude about something is
>> "What could go wrong?", well...
>
>What you read as an "attitude" was typed as a legitimate question.
"What can go wrong?" attitude leads to complacency.
>As far as being distracted, of course, that happens to all of us from time
>to time. But if I am doing something like making a "hazardous" cut (e.g.
>fingers close the blade) my concentration is centered on the cut.
THe nonchalant "What can go wrong?" attitude makes it a whole lot
worse. If you *expect* something to go wrong, distractions are a lot
less likely.
>
>I'm going to take a guess here and assume that you do the same thing:
>"OK, pay attention. Where are my fingers, what is the wood going to do?
>What could go wrong?"
The difference is that you're saying "What can go wrong?" as in "What,
me worry?", vs my attitude of "what _could_ go wrong?" (there is a
difference", or what happens _if_ something does go wrong". I don't
want my hands anywhere near the blade if something *DOES* go wrong,
even if that something could "never go wrong".
I'm a conservative. Unintended consequences are inevitable.
>
>I tend to follow the old adage of "If what you are about to do makes you
>uncomfortable, there is probably a reason." Stop, think about it and perhaps
>comes up with an alternative way to get the job done.
So that's why you put your fingers 2" from the blade? Putting your
fingers right next to a spinning, moving, blade doesn't make you
uncomfortable? It certainly does me. That's why they're a shoulder's
width away.
>> As soon as you say "What could go wrong?" It will.
>
>Nope, because, at least for me, saying "What could go wrong?" is not
>the cavalier attitude that you took it to be. It's a legitimate question. An
>assessment of the situation. A chance to change what I'm going to do
>next, because I took the time to answer the question.
Yet you put your fingers right next to a spinning, moving blade. Even
parallax doesn't bother you.
>I ask myself that question all time and not just in the shop. Setting up
>a ladder, jacking up the car, any situation where something *could* go
>wrong, I ask myself "What could go wrong?" and then I adjust my plan
>as required.
>
But you don't think "What can go wrong, then lean 2' outside the
ladder or use the top step anyway.