<the smooth and refined sound of coffee coming out of my nose>
"Steve Turner" <bbqb...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:3EBBC0A9...@netscape.net...
So I certainly wasn't snorting at your question; it was the price,
definitely. I might be inclined to ask the same question, but with a
few exclamation points and "WTF's?" peppered in there... :-)
I seem to recall seeing a TV program where they went to see Geoff and watch
him make one of these, and certainly remember the price was around 2k
pounds.
As I say, I have no intention of buying one - happy furtling around with my
Stanley and Records at the mo, with possible future upgrade to LN or
Clifton.
Anyway - curious about them. Specially if there's nothing that special
about em, in which case I may learn how to make dovetailed infill planes, so
I can flog em for that price too!
"Steve Turner" <bbqb...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:3EBBE06A...@netscape.net...
Well, you got my attention. :-) No coffee out the nose but the same
reaction otherwise.
Seems like somebody who made $2,000 planes would produce something on
Google but I come up three hits on "Geoff Entwistle" and none of them
say anything about planes.
It IS wood planes, right? Not airplanes or sailplanes or any other kind?
Where'd you find this guy?
Dan
Depleted uranium 238 infill, probably. Cuts smoother than smooth.
>
> Well, you got my attention. :-) No coffee out the nose but the same
> reaction otherwise.
>
> Seems like somebody who made $2,000 planes would produce something on
> Google but I come up three hits on "Geoff Entwistle" and none of them
> say anything about planes.
>
> It IS wood planes, right? Not airplanes or sailplanes or any other kind?
> Where'd you find this guy?
>
> Dan
>
These are downright bargains compared to some of Karl Holtey's models.
R.
Here is a link to Entwistle planes and others.
http://home.pacifier.com/~davewe/modern.htm
They're cheap knock-offs of the Holteys 8-)
I think I did handle one a while ago (if not a Geoff Entwistle, then
some similar maker). The damn thing had square edges all over it, so
that not only was it unusable, but it was seemingly deliberately
finished so that any attempt to use it would cause obvious wear, thus
making it no longer pristine.
Makes my Norris look positively utilitarian. Come to think of it, my
Norris _is_ utilitarian. It works fine, and there's no concession on
it to anything that isn't work-related. I know which I'd prefer.
http://www.thebestthings.com/newtools/entwistle.htm
<shrugs> look pretty ugly to me, but there you go!
"Dan" <s...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:b9gmfe$isp$1...@news.doit.wisc.edu...
: These are downright bargains compared to some of Karl Holtey's models.
: R.
Viewable at:
Well worth the browse.
-- Andy Barss