At what point should I transition?
Any comments, thoughts, suggestions?
Oh yes, I am proud of my progress!!! :)
Thanks
Brian
:)
Energy
Brian G. <pgil...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Knnw3.17880$TM2.261810@viper...
>At my local launch site I asked the local board heads about the GO board.
Obviously they've never sailed a Go!
>The response I got was laughter!
Where are you sailing? I think that in about 3 months, at your rate of
progress, you'd be the one laughing.
You will probably be planing right by them in lite air, and perhaps passing them
in up to 20 knots, regardless of the type of boards they are sailing.
> They all seem to think it is not worth the
>money and that If I wish to get into a short board I would be better off
>with some other board in the 9 ft range.
It's definitely worth the money, as the EVA deck Go is priced somewhat below
most of the 9 ft. boards they are talking about unless you buy used.
But the real deciding factor is the prevailing windspeed. If it's in the 6-12
knot range most of the time, get the GO, if it's consistently 12-18, then
the Go will work, but maybe the 299 Free might be a better choice.
If it's consistently over 15 knots, then they may be correct, but Starboard has
you covered here as well. The 272/282 Free or the 285 Sonic will probably dust
them all.
Another option, a bit more expensive, would be the new F2 290 Xantos.
If the wind is above 12, the Bic Techno or the Fanatic Bee would be good.
Remember, you need to judge how early you want to plane, so if the locals are
all sitting around "complaining" in 8-12 knots, at your weight, with a good low
end power camless 8.5, on the Go, you will be rippin'!
> I weigh in at 145~150lb, am a
>beginner (1 week) and can tack and almost complete all my jibes. Currently
>I am using a 370cm long board and 5.0, 6.0, & 7.5 Pacific Phase sails, have
>begun to use my harness and footstraps. and have sailed comfortable in
>15-20mph winds.
To really get the most out of the Go, you need one larger sail!
Congrats on your rapid progress!
> Maybe I should not think about another board for a while
>but I figure it will take me 6 months to year to make my mind up (or that
>long to know what to really look for). All my sailing is on inland lakes.
>At what point should I transition?
Sounds like you are ready now, and that the 370 is probably holding you back.
Anything you can learn/do on the 370 will be easier and faster on the GO!
>Oh yes, I am proud of my progress!!! :)
As well you should be!
sailquik (Roger Jackson) US 7011
Cert. WS Instructor (Lvl 1)
F2/MPB/Sailworks/Tectonics/True Ames/Chinook/Kokatat/DaKine
Phones: So. MD (301)872-9459; Avon, NC (252) 995-3204
Jerry McEwen wrote:
>
> Congratulations on your excellent progress, Brian!
>
> I see several people have given you good advice, but I disagree with
> them ever so slightly. I think the GO would be great from you (from
> what I hear about it, I haven't seen one), but at 145 lbs, I can see
> you kicking butt on a 5.5 or 6.0 and a 280 in 15 knots.
>
> hth
>
Grant in Alberta
John:
Even the GO has it's limits,and I think what would be considered "normal" Gorge
conditions would definitely exceed the GO's limits.
If the conditions were <25 knots, and you were sailing at one of the more flat
water sites, the Go would work fine, but these are NOT the condiitions that most
people go to the Gorge to sail in.
Hope this helps!
Francois
>Uhh, hmmm, oh yeah, sorry. What I meant was a 280 cm board in the 115
>liter range.
Why? In 15 knots, the Go with a 7.5 will probably be going right past all the
280 115 liter boards, even with 6.5-7.5 sails.
The secret here is the size of the fin. The Go has the width to give the sailor
good positive control of the 54 cm Curtis fin, so it rips upwind, and rides OVER
alot of chop & slop that the narrower, less floaty board will have to negotiate.
Also, you are so far back on the GO that you have much better pitch (fore/aft
bouncing) control. This makes a huge difference in a sailor's ability to handle
a board/fin combination this large in what would seem to be too much wind
and sea conditions.
At the Frisco Woods Windfest last spring, Brett ( the Starboard rep) was out
on a GO when the speed check was going on. He was keeping up with or passing
many of the speed check participants on a GO with a 6.5-7.5 (maximally
downhauled I think).
He might easily have finished well in the Speed Check, but there was only about
40 cm of water in by the timing stand, and he was on a 54 cm fin.
later
I'm 210# and the GO that I tried was way, way, way too big for me and any sail
smaller than about 8.5. Maybe they come in different sizes. This one had
holes for the leeboard fins and a skeg that must've been two feet long.
If I weighed 145, I wouldn't even think of anything over 150L.
-----------------------
Pete Cresswell
:)
Jeff
(Pete Cresswell) <h...@fatbelly.com> wrote in message
news:37c94353...@news.earthlink.net...
Jamie
Jamie Sanders
Chalkwell Windsurfing Club
http://freespace.virgin.net/ken.rosier/cwc.htm
--
--
Vaughan James Sanders
Annie wrote:
>
> My 65 y.o friend LOVES his Go board..he is about 5'10, 170 #..I tried it..it
> is hugely wide..probably a GREAT board for a beginner going into a short
> board..fun to play with...when he is not using it, everyone tries it..A
> couple of experts were on it yesterday doing all kinds of freestyle..Annie
Jerry McEwen wrote:
>
> I know you and Roger sail much more than I do, but when I was 155
> pounds, I was ripping on a 115 liter 9'2" with a 5.5 in 15 knots. I'm
> just afraid he will run out of range too soon.
My son who is an excellent windsurfer and owns a windsurfing shop thinks it is
a real breakthru. My husband has one and lots of guys at the beach have tried
it and a few are considering purchasing one.
The Starboard Go is nothing to laugh about.
Joan
If you're thinking about a GO, use the Nike approach.
Just do it!
The less you weigh, the less board you can stand on without sinking.
All other things being equal, the bigger the board, the less maneuverable it is
and the less fun to turn it is.
My impression of the Go and similarly-sized boards is that they are OK for
straight-line sailing and certainly do plane earlier than smaller "big" boards,
but you can't crank turns or zig-zag as freely and easily as on a smaller board.
Clearly this is a matter of individual preference.
I know somebody about my wight that has a beeeeg AHD wide-style and really,
truly loves and enjoys it....but he likes to plane as much as possible and tends
to sail long, straight tacks with a turn at each end. We were both sailing
the same model WindWing 6.7 a couple of weeks ago and he was just *flying* past
me and probably planing a good 20% more of the time than I was.
OTHO, my brain's pleasure center gets the most stimulation the more turns I can
crank and the more I can zig-zag up-and-down the chop between turns....and my
day doesn't suffer if I have to slog a little (not *too* much, mind you....).
I tried the Mistral Vison 150 and ordered one. Tried the 170 (which
Windsurfing mag's review says is the "right" one for me) and thought it was just
too big for what I like to do.
Two different sailors, two different board preferences.
I guess that's why they make chocolate and vanilla....
-----------------------
Pete Cresswell