Steve
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Steve-
The Ride 279 is the latest version of the Ride 282, which I rode for 2
seasons and then sold to get the Air 265. Both are excellent. For
overpowered, slalom-type sailing, especially with 7.5-8.0 sails with a
big fin, I would favor the Ride. The Air 265 requires a more upright
stance, is much more fun in small waves and for going rail-to-rail and
is more forgiving during light wind maneuvers (eg heli-tacks) due to its
extra width. Planing threshold is similar, but the Air 265 seems to keep
planing a bit longer in the holes. Both boards feel a bit big to me in
the air, but are easy to launch. I am very happy with the Air 265.
Gary
The AHD 65and the 279 Ride are in the same class of boards, that is
the Light to moderate Air Slalom. Both have excellent planning ability
and speed. They are geared toward a sailor that likes speed, Quick
planning and easy jibing.
The Air is in the "freesytle" category.
As Gary mentioned the Air is an excellent board for learing tricks due
to the more evenly proportioned volume distribution, But freestlye
board are also excellent jibing boards and can plane through a jibe
very easily when comparred to a more slalom oriented board.
Freesytle boards tend to be very quick to plane and have a very large
wind range. This makes them very attractive to many sailors who want
to reduce the number of boards they need. Speed is not always a
prominent factor as the boards geared toward the sailor who wants
versatility. This is not to say that they are not fast as some are
very quick, It is only to say that for a speed demon they may not be
the right board.
Feel free to give me a call if you have questions, I stock all of the
boards you were enquiring about.
Have Fun
Philip
Philip Mann
Inland Sea Windsurf Co.
1-888-INLANDC
1-802-862-3847
http://www.inlandsea.com
http://www.kitesite.net
Philip Mann wrote:
> Freesytle boards tend to be very quick to plane and have a very large
> wind range. This makes them very attractive to many sailors who want
> to reduce the number of boards they need.
>