--
________
To email me, Edit "blog" from my email address.
Brian M. Kochera
"Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once!"
View My Web Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~brian1951
Don't know but in this situation there is no alternative.
Jaap
"Brian K" <brian1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:k6adndTYFrvG4ZPV...@earthlink.com...
The safety issue is getting on and off the tender ... If being used to
evacuate the ship ... that risk becomes tolerable ...
> The safety issue is getting on and off the tender ... If being used to
> evacuate the ship ... that risk becomes tolerable ...
Right the main issue is not the tenders themselves but getting on and
off but if the seas are very rough the boat ride is not pleasant. The
worst experience I had was tendering to Key West of all places which is
usually a docking stop. People were throwing up and we were also soaked
with water. They probably should have canceled that port call.
Also the life boats are only sometimes used as tenders. At some ports
there are tenders from the port are usually used. Grand Cayman comes to
mind. And Labadee they don't use the lifeboats.
When used to evacuate a ship that is a different purpose. Like that
recent ship that sunk in the Antarctica sea. Even if the seas are very
rough, taking to the life boats, the passengers would fare better than
going down with the ship.
--
Charles
This is what I needed to see while eating dinner <g>
Marsha/Ohio
Charles meant to add ... their arms in disbelief at the conditions ...
> Charles meant to add ... their arms in disbelief at the conditions ...
Speaking of disbelief, on all the cruises I have been on that missed
ports because of rough seas there were "second guessers" who thought it
was not that rough, that they knew better, and that the port should not
have been skipped.
--
Charles
> Cruise Ships concerned with the safety of passengers have often canceled
> ports where tendering is not doable. These very same ships tenders are
> to be used as life boats if need be. Now, my question is this, if they
> can't be used to tender in rough seas, how well will they fare as life
> boats under the same conditions. Or, will they only be fair weather
> life boats?
BIG difference in liability and other issues when discussing
mandatory evacuation than when discussing trips to shore.
I wonder if they feel the same way when an airplane pilot doesn't land
on a runway covered with snow ...
C'mon pilot/airport controller or whoever ... We can make it ... land
the plane ...
"Brian K" <brian1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:k6adndTYFrvG4ZPV...@earthlink.com...
When tendering to a vacation port, the captain avoids bumps and bruises to
passengers that a tender ride might cause. That's not much of a concern
when leaving a sinking ship. Clearly there are different rules for tenders
as for life boats, even if the device is the same.
Just my opinion,
Harry Cooper
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
> In an evacuation scenario the boats are loaded at the boat deck
> hanging (nearly) motionless from the davits. When tendering they are
> lowered into the water with only a couple of crew onboard then loaded
> alongside a ship in possibly rough seas.
>
Just to add on. When evacuating the lifeboats are moving with the ship.
when used as tenders they tend to react more quickly to the swells. If you
have ever watched a ship taking on passengers after the waves have come up
you know just how dangerous it can be and why tender ports get cancelled.
One can only take one passenger at a time on or off and that has to be
timed to the swell, slow and tricky.
>
--
Joseph Coulter, cruises and vacations
www.josephcoulter.com
yourva...@comcast.net
877 832 2021
904 631 8863 cell