Fourth London airport

[Bill]

Any one got any ideas or alternatives to either a third Heathrow
runway (Gawd help us all, a bigger and even less efficient Heathrow)
or 'Boris Island' in the Thames Estuary, which would cost as much as
our nuclear deterrent replacement...

[tim.....]

"Bill" wrote in message news:1jur38tp112uiudp7...@4ax.com...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think that we should build a second runway at Gatwick.

It will affect a tiny fraction of the people that the extra runway at LHR
will affect and already has better rail connections and serves a more
populous non London catchment than STN.

I agree with Simon Jenkins from what someone posted on a different group
this morning:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/heathrow-third-runway-big-willy-politics

That is, we do not need extra runways to create a bigger hub. If the aim of
the extra runway is to create growth then that growth is not helped one tiny
little bit by people in-lining airside. if (however) London business does
need more runway capacity for origination and terminating passengers that
does not need to be at LHR and LGW is just as good IMHO

tim

[JohnT]

"tim....." <tims_n...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aa6lhf...@mid.individual.net...

But a second runway at Gatwick is not possible until 2019 at the earliest:

"The construction of any new runway at Gatwick is ruled out before August
2019 by a legal agreement between BAA and West Sussex County Council. The
agreement applies to whoever owns Gatwick, and could only be overturned by
legislation which would need to be passed by both Houses of Parliament. The
House of Lords might well refuse to pass such a Bill.
The legal agreement merely reflects the physical constraints of the site.
They will remain when the agreement expires."

I am aware that BAA no longer own LGW, but that does not in any way affect
the legal agreement.
--
JohnT

[tim.....]

"JohnT" wrote in message news:aa6opm...@mid.individual.net...

"tim....." <tims_n...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aa6lhf...@mid.individual.net...
> "Bill" wrote in message
> news:1jur38tp112uiudp7...@4ax.com...
>
> Any one got any ideas or alternatives to either a third Heathrow
> runway (Gawd help us all, a bigger and even less efficient Heathrow)
> or 'Boris Island' in the Thames Estuary, which would cost as much as
> our nuclear deterrent replacement...
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think that we should build a second runway at Gatwick.
>
> It will affect a tiny fraction of the people that the extra runway at LHR
> will affect and already has better rail connections and serves a more
> populous non London catchment than STN.
>
> I agree with Simon Jenkins from what someone posted on a different group
> this morning:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/heathrow-third-runway-big-willy-politics
>
> That is, we do not need extra runways to create a bigger hub. If the aim
> of the extra runway is to create growth then that growth is not helped one
> tiny little bit by people in-lining airside. if (however) London business
> does need more runway capacity for origination and terminating passengers
> that does not need to be at LHR and LGW is just as good IMHO
>

But a second runway at Gatwick is not possible until 2019 at the earliest:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So we wait until 2019 to start to build.

It will take 2 or 3 years to get through planning anyway, so we're only
going to lose a few years.

And a new runway will (almost certainly) need a new terminal (and links to
the railway) which will take longer to build than a runway so we can start
that before 2019 as it isn't technically "building the runway".

tim

[Bill]

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:54:51 +0100, "JohnT" <johns...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I'm prone to 'Boris Island' myself, although I notice the 'third
runway at Heathrow' rhetoric has changed somewhat in the past week.

They started out talking about more flights to the Far East, and that
changed to 'More flights to China' when someone mentioned that about
10% of flights to India has stopped flying in the past two years...

My opinion is that what we need are more long haul scheduled flights
flying from provincial airports.

Why are there no scheduled flights to India from Leed/Bradford or
Manchester or Birmingham? Both have significant Indian populations.

[Jake]

"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5kds38lann85ohu4u...@4ax.com...

It's a lot cheaper to fly with KLM from LBA-AMS and take advantage of the
range of non UK APD flights available from Schiphol than it is to make your
way from there to Heathrow/Gatwick.

[JohnT]

"Jake" <Ja...@jakesplaice.com> wrote in message
news:_uudnfo_o5Zi5aPN...@giganews.com...

If the flights are on the same Itinerary, APD is payable. If seperate
tickets then perhaps not, but if your incoming to AMS is late or cancelled
and you miss your flight out of AMS you won't get re-routed and are up the
creek without a paddle. And I have never ever been able to find anything
cheaper in the manner you describe. Perhaps you could give some precise
examples?


--
JohnT

[tim.....]

"Jake" wrote in message
news:_uudnfo_o5Zi5aPN...@giganews.com...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So the solution to encourage airlines to operate more LH flights from
regional airports (which I think most people can see might be a viable
alternative to a new runway in the SE) is to make APD dependent upon
departure airport.

tim

[Bill]

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:18:01 +0100, "Jake" <Ja...@jakesplaice.com>
wrote:

>
>It's a lot cheaper to fly with KLM from LBA-AMS and take advantage of the
>range of non UK APD flights available from Schiphol than it is to make your
>way from there to Heathrow/Gatwick.
>

None APD?

What do you do?

Overnight on a bench at Schiphol or take the risk that your connecting
flight will happen on schedule?

[Jake]

"Bill" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:812t381eld6ot05u3...@4ax.com...

You take the risk of course, building longer into your schedule. And why not
overnight at Schiphol if it saves you a packet?

[Bill]

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:03:51 +0100, "Jake" <Ja...@jakesplaice.com>
wrote:

Sounds like you don't do much flying.

I have no wish to make a �500 bet on my arrival when flying to the Far
East...

I'm way past the age when sleeping on a chair in an airport is in any
way entertaining and that amount of money won't get you a night in an
airport hotel.

It's just not worth it if you're having a couple of weeks on the beach
in Spain or Italy and when you're going to India or China and you
already have transport laid on and hotels booked the chaos caused by
missing a flight isn't worth the sixty or seventy quid you save.

Nope, you're talking bollocks...

[tim.....]

"Jake" wrote in message
news:ac6dnWvtZMFLDKPN...@giganews.com...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the saving might only be 54 pounds, that doesn't seem to be worth it!

[A Guy Called Tyketto]

You have a fourth London airport, at least according to the IATA:

http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/londons-ridiculous-new-airport--80km-from-the-city-20120809-23w0a.html

BL.
--
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyk...@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyk...@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

[Ulf Kutzner]

Short runway. Well, PIA operated an Islamabad service until 2014,
maybe with refueling?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_Bradford_Airport#1995_to_date
says nonstop. Maybe without full load.

By the way, Air India just ordered lots of Boeing and Airbus aircraft
for international hub operation in India.

Regards, ULF