StephenJ <
sjo...@cox.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Analysts predict up up 8 million brown refuges from war-torn
>> Venezuela needing sanctuary and that will of course, be
>> USA.
>
> A war might bring a quick end to Venezuela's agony, which has been going
> on for a long time. That's one possible outcome. Better it be conducted
> by a coalition of South American countries, though. They are the
> immediate neighbors.
Coalition of South American countries?
You mean the plan should be to draw them into it, in order to
force them to share the refugee burden later?
Well, it's a smart move.
But as much as smart it may be from a practical perspective,
minimizing the brown influx for USA, it doesn't make the whole
thing a wee bit legal.
One aggressor, or five aggressors, it changes nothing from a legal
point if view.
Venezuela is a sovereign country, UN member and only UN security
council can make decisions of perhaps stripping Venezuelan
government of legality.
Venezuela also hasn't attacked any country.
And even these so called protests, this guy Maduro won election
last year, and the other guy who now hopes to be the usurper came
out of nowhere.
He wasn't even running against Maduro, so that one could say he
was robbed of victory.
In the greatest democracy, Hillary robbed Sanders of nomination,
so I'm pretty sure Venezuelan democracy has many flaws, but so
what? It is for them, it's their country. They might be flawed
democracy, but they're a democracy.
There are many countries, that aren't even nominally democracies.
E.g. Saudi Arabia or China. So the whole "we should invade
non-democracies" line is a bit unconvincing.
As for your hopes of war bringing quick end to Venezuelan agony,
I'm not so sure about it.
The current government has been in power for 2 decades now (couple
of years longer than Merkel in Germany) and they enjoy great
support.
They have opponents, as the country is polarized, but they have
huge support as well.
An ideal prerequisite for a bloody civil war once foreign meddling
begins.
As for Venezuelan agony, we have to be sincere and admit that US
sanctions and US desire to punish their socialist government in
the past 2 decades was a main contributing factor to their
current agony.
Socialism might be bad, but it's not that bad that you'll end up
without toilet paper. US sanctions will help there.
We know that the globalist and neocons have their agenda (global
rule and Kalergi) plan, but they're marketing their war effort by
saying democracy and capitalism should be restored here.
Well, that's what shows you neocons are just a bunch of
warmongering former liberals who don't actually believe in
natural superiority of capitalism and feel the need to impose
that stuff.
True conservatives and believers in superiority of both capitalism
and democracy, such as Ron Paul said US should have traded with
Venezuela, not sanctioned them.
The example and natural flow would do its own...