Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Timeline Of Trump And Russia In Mid-2016: A series of Coincidences?
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Pelle Svanslös
Jul 21, 2017, 6:56:21 AM7/21/17
to
The video appeared on YouTube on March 4, three days after the bonanza
of primaries and caucuses known as Super Tuesday. New York billionaire
Donald Trump had dominated the contests, cementing his improbable rise
to Republican front-runner. And a Russian man named Alexander Dugin was
providing his own colorful commentary on the results, in heavily
accented English.
The message was unmistakable: Russia was officially rooting for Trump.
"Go ahead, Mr. Trump, in Trump we Trust," Dugin said, staring into the
camera.
Dugin isn't just a random crank with a YouTube channel. He is an
influential political analyst and philosopher with deep ties to the
Russian government. He is known variously as "Putin's Brain" and
"Putin's Rasputin," a moniker he was given by Breitbart News in 2014.
In the video, Dugin sits behind an anchor desk, offering disdain for
American democracy ("How dare they lecture us about human rights and the
fight against corruption?") and neoconservative foreign policy. For
Trump, there is praise of his populism and his "America First" approach
to the world. For Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, then a Republican candidate
for president, there are graphic insults. But Dugin reserves his
harshest criticism for Hillary Clinton and the Democratic primary process.
"There is nothing more stupid and fake than the American vote counting
system," Dugin said. "The majority votes for [Bernie] Sanders but
Clinton wins, bribing the electors."
While Dugin was publicly stating his desired outcome for the 2016
election, a Russian military intelligence service was quietly taking
steps that would later rock the 2016 campaign. According to the U.S.
intelligence community's declassified assessment of Russian interference
in the 2016 election, Russia's GRU began rifling through the email
accounts and networks of Democratic Party officials and political
figures in March 2016.
The timeline of events in the spring and summer of 2016 has taken on new
meaning in light of the email chain released last week by Donald Trump
Jr., showing an offer of help for the Trump campaign, purportedly from
Russia. Here we reconstruct those events.
The question that multiple congressional committees and special counsel
Robert Mueller are now examining is whether the events on this timeline
— the striking parallels between what Donald Trump said on the campaign
trail last year and the messages coming out of Russia — are connected or
are mere coincidences.
Trump has repeatedly denied that he or his campaign had any involvement
in colluding with Russia during the 2016 election cycle. Russian
President Vladimir Putin has also repeatedly denied that his government
had any role in meddling in last year's U.S. presidential election.
Putin did so most recently when the two leaders met on the sidelines of
this year's Group of 20 summit, according to both presidents and their
respective top diplomats.
April 2016
Trump was running as an anti-establishment outsider, more than happy to
throw doubt on the American political system, and by early April, that
included complaining about a "phony system" that he said was rigged
against himself and Bernie Sanders, who was seeking the Democratic
nomination.
"He wins, and then you listen to the pundits: 'But he can't win,' "
Trump said April 15 at a rally in Plattsburgh, N.Y. "You know why,
because it's a rigged system folks. It's a rigged system."
Russia's affinity for Trump was driven in part by his view of America's
role in the world. Just like Russia's leadership, Trump was critical of
the Iraq War, American encouragement of the Arab Spring movement and the
decision to invade Libya. This set Trump apart from both Clinton and the
rest of the Republican field of primary candidates.
And then there was simply the way he talked about Russia and his
openness to working with the country.
"I believe an easing of tensions, and improved relations with Russia
from a position of strength only, is possible, absolutely possible,"
Trump said in a foreign policy speech at the Mayflower Hotel on April
27, 2016, in Washington, D.C. "Common sense says this cycle, this
horrible cycle of hostility must end and ideally will end soon. Good for
both countries. Some say the Russians won't be reasonable. I intend to
find out."
Sergey Kislyak, then the Russian ambassador to the U.S., was sitting in
the front row, according to a report by Radio Free Europe.
The U.S. intelligence assessment says that by May 2016, Russian hackers
had extracted large volumes of data from the Democratic National
Committee's systems.
June 2016
In early June, as the primaries in both parties were winding down,
Clinton turned her fire to Trump. In a speech that marked her pivot
toward the general election, she mocked Trump for saying so many nice
things about Putin.
"Now I will leave it to psychiatrists to explain his affection for
tyrants," Clinton said in San Diego on June 2. "I just wonder how anyone
could be so wrong about who America's real friends are. Because it
matters. If you don't know exactly who you're dealing with, men like
Putin will eat your lunch."
That week, and the week after, are now under intense scrutiny.
Just a day after Clinton's speech, Donald Trump Jr. received the now
notorious email from a man linked to a Russian real estate developer
whom the Trumps had partnered with on the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in
Moscow. He offered to connect the Trump campaign with people who could
supply official Russian documents that would incriminate Clinton. The
offer was said to be part of "Russia and its government's support for
Mr. Trump."
Trump Jr. was traveling at the time, but it took him just 20 minutes to
reply: "if it's what you say, I love it, especially later in the summer."
Four days later, on June 7, was the end of the 2016 Republican
presidential primaries. In a speech to his supporters that night,
candidate Trump said something that is getting a lot of attention now:
He teased an attack on Clinton.
"I am going to give a major speech on, probably Monday of next week, and
we are going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place
with the Clintons," Trump said. "I think you are going to find it very
informative and very, very interesting."
When asked whether this had anything to do with what was promised in the
email chain, a spokesman for President Trump's outside legal team said
the candidate "was not aware of and did not attend the meeting."
Two days later, on June 9, the meeting happened at Trump Tower as
planned — with Donald Trump Jr., then-Trump campaign chairman Paul
Manafort and Jared Kushner, President Trump's son-in-law, who is now a
top White House adviser, all in attendance. Trump Jr.'s explanation of
who else was in that meeting has evolved over time, but those also in
attendance included a Russian lawyer, a Russian-American lobbyist and at
least one language interpreter.
Trump Jr. told Sean Hannity on Fox News that the Russians didn't deliver
what they promised in the meeting. "It was literally just a wasted 20
minutes, which was a shame," Trump Jr. said.
His father didn't end up delivering that major speech either [Trump was
aware of the meeting?], at least not on the day he promised. The Pulse
Nightclub shooting that left nearly 50 people dead happened in Orlando,
Fla., over that weekend and briefly shifted the focus of the campaign.
Something else happened that weekend that didn't seem all that
significant at the time. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange made an
announcement.
"We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton, which is great,"
he said, in an interview with Britain's ITV. "We actually have,
WikiLeaks has, a very big year ahead."
Assange and WikiLeaks have long had an ideological affinity and close
ties with Russia.
WikiLeaks had been posting the already-public Clinton State Department
emails on its website. What people were wondering was whether WikiLeaks
had the roughly 30,000 personal emails Clinton had deleted from her
private server. Assange was cagey when asked about that and, as a
result, many assumed he was just blowing smoke.
But then a few days later, a site called DCLeaks and someone going by
the name Guccifer 2.0 released some files taken from the DNC's systems.
At the time, Trump blamed the DNC for its own misfortune.
"We believe it was the DNC that did the 'hacking' as a way to distract
from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed
party leader," Trump said in a statement. "Too bad the DNC doesn't hack
Crooked Hillary's 33,000 missing emails."
The U.S. intelligence assessment says with high confidence that DCLeaks
and Guccifer 2.0 were just a front for Russia's military intelligence
agency the GRU.
"It's very clear that the GRU was responsible for hacking into the — the
networks of the DNC, DCCC, and were responsible, through a cutout,
releasing it through places like Guccifer 2.0, WikiLeaks and — and
others," former CIA Director John Brennan testified before the Senate
Intelligence Committee.
He said the GRU delivered to WikiLeaks thousands of DNC emails, as well
as those taken from senior Democratic officials, like Clinton campaign
chairman John Podesta.
On June 22, Trump finally delivered a speech going after Clinton and her
family's foundation, but there were no major revelations. It was sort of
a greatest hits version of previous attacks he had made against her.
July 2016
July was always going to be a momentous month in the campaign, with vice
presidential picks being announced and the parties' conventions
happening in Cleveland and Philadelphia. But it turned out to be pivotal.
In early July 2016, Carter Page went to Moscow to deliver a speech. He
was a minor figure in the Trump campaign, a policy adviser few people
had ever heard of before Trump mentioned him in an editorial board
meeting with The Washington Post.
We now know July is also the month the FBI began investigating possible
ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, though the public wouldn't
find out until well after the election.
In Cleveland, on July 21, one year ago this coming weekend, Donald Trump
closed out the GOP convention with a dark speech that fired up his
supporters.
"This is the legacy of Hillary Clinton: death, destruction, terrorism
and weakness," he said to rousing applause and cheers.
July 2016
July was always going to be a momentous month in the campaign, with vice
presidential picks being announced and the parties' conventions
happening in Cleveland and Philadelphia. But it turned out to be pivotal.
In early July 2016, Carter Page went to Moscow to deliver a speech. He
was a minor figure in the Trump campaign, a policy adviser few people
had ever heard of before Trump mentioned him in an editorial board
meeting with The Washington Post.
We now know July is also the month the FBI began investigating possible
ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, though the public wouldn't
find out until well after the election.
In Cleveland, on July 21, one year ago this coming weekend, Donald Trump
closed out the GOP convention with a dark speech that fired up his
supporters.
"This is the legacy of Hillary Clinton: death, destruction, terrorism
and weakness," he said to rousing applause and cheers.
Trump tweeted about the DNC hack repeatedly, including a "joke" that
maybe it had happened "because Putin likes me."
The Russian propaganda machine — including RT, the Russian
government-sponsored, English language television channel that is beamed
into homes all over America — had an undeniable message at the time.
"Speaking of crime and Internet and fame and money and politicians, one
immediately thinks of Hillary Clinton," said one RT announcer.
On July 25, a reporter on the state-run channel argued that any focus on
Russian involvement in the email leak was just a distraction from the
real issue — how terribly unfair the DNC had been to Sanders.
"When immediately after the leaks, the Clinton campaign began to blame
Russia instead of addressing the revelations in the leaks, to many it
sounded like a joke, like something you would see in the Onion fake
news," said RT reporter Gayane Chichakyan. "Except it was real news."
On July 27, Trump held a press conference and was asked whether he would
call on Putin to stay out of the election.
"Why should I tell Putin what to do?" Trump said, before turning to a
talking point used by both Trump's campaign and Russian media outlets.
"Let me tell you, it's not even about Russia or China or whoever it is
that's doing the hacking. It's about what was said in those emails.
Those were terrible things."
Rather than condemn the hacking, at his press conference Trump seemingly
encouraged Russia to keep going.
"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000
emails that are missing," Trump said, referring to Clinton's deleted
personal emails. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our
press. Let's see if that happens. That will be next."
After that, a reporter pressed Trump on whether he had any qualms about
asking a foreign government to interfere or to hack.
"Nope. Gives me no pause. If they have them, they have them," he said.
The personal emails deleted from Clinton's private server still haven't
surfaced publicly. But, in early October, WikiLeaks began posting a new
batch of internal Clinton campaign emails each day. And it was rewarded
mightily with a constant stream of negative stories about Clinton.
Clint Watts, Robert A. Fox Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research
Institute, began raising alarms about Russian measures to influence the
American public's political views shortly after Trump's press conference.
"Once you see both the campaign echoing the messages and themes that are
coming out from RT and Sputnik News, when you see hacked materials of
the DNC strategically linked and timed in terms of their release to
influence the U.S. election in favor of Trump, then when you see Trump
get onto stages or make prepared speeches where he refers to both Russia
and Clinton's emails, it seems very ominous, in terms of maybe there was
some connection between the two," said Watts. "At a minimum, they were
at least looking or aware of those lines or influenced by Russian
propaganda to be saying it almost near verbatim throughout those months."
Whether Trump was a witting or unwitting beneficiary of Russia's efforts
hasn't been proven, but as Watts sees it, Russia benefited from the way
candidate Trump ran his campaign.
"The bottom line is Russian active measures were deployed to influence
the U.S. election," Watts said, referring to the effort to discredit the
political system and turn voters against Clinton. "They worked in large
part because one candidate used Russian active measures to his own benefit."
http://www.npr.org/2017/07/17/537323120/timeline-of-trump-and-russia-in-mid-2016-a-series-of-coincidences-or-something-m
of primaries and caucuses known as Super Tuesday. New York billionaire
Donald Trump had dominated the contests, cementing his improbable rise
to Republican front-runner. And a Russian man named Alexander Dugin was
providing his own colorful commentary on the results, in heavily
accented English.
The message was unmistakable: Russia was officially rooting for Trump.
"Go ahead, Mr. Trump, in Trump we Trust," Dugin said, staring into the
camera.
Dugin isn't just a random crank with a YouTube channel. He is an
influential political analyst and philosopher with deep ties to the
Russian government. He is known variously as "Putin's Brain" and
"Putin's Rasputin," a moniker he was given by Breitbart News in 2014.
In the video, Dugin sits behind an anchor desk, offering disdain for
American democracy ("How dare they lecture us about human rights and the
fight against corruption?") and neoconservative foreign policy. For
Trump, there is praise of his populism and his "America First" approach
to the world. For Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, then a Republican candidate
for president, there are graphic insults. But Dugin reserves his
harshest criticism for Hillary Clinton and the Democratic primary process.
"There is nothing more stupid and fake than the American vote counting
system," Dugin said. "The majority votes for [Bernie] Sanders but
Clinton wins, bribing the electors."
While Dugin was publicly stating his desired outcome for the 2016
election, a Russian military intelligence service was quietly taking
steps that would later rock the 2016 campaign. According to the U.S.
intelligence community's declassified assessment of Russian interference
in the 2016 election, Russia's GRU began rifling through the email
accounts and networks of Democratic Party officials and political
figures in March 2016.
The timeline of events in the spring and summer of 2016 has taken on new
meaning in light of the email chain released last week by Donald Trump
Jr., showing an offer of help for the Trump campaign, purportedly from
Russia. Here we reconstruct those events.
The question that multiple congressional committees and special counsel
Robert Mueller are now examining is whether the events on this timeline
— the striking parallels between what Donald Trump said on the campaign
trail last year and the messages coming out of Russia — are connected or
are mere coincidences.
Trump has repeatedly denied that he or his campaign had any involvement
in colluding with Russia during the 2016 election cycle. Russian
President Vladimir Putin has also repeatedly denied that his government
had any role in meddling in last year's U.S. presidential election.
Putin did so most recently when the two leaders met on the sidelines of
this year's Group of 20 summit, according to both presidents and their
respective top diplomats.
April 2016
Trump was running as an anti-establishment outsider, more than happy to
throw doubt on the American political system, and by early April, that
included complaining about a "phony system" that he said was rigged
against himself and Bernie Sanders, who was seeking the Democratic
nomination.
"He wins, and then you listen to the pundits: 'But he can't win,' "
Trump said April 15 at a rally in Plattsburgh, N.Y. "You know why,
because it's a rigged system folks. It's a rigged system."
Russia's affinity for Trump was driven in part by his view of America's
role in the world. Just like Russia's leadership, Trump was critical of
the Iraq War, American encouragement of the Arab Spring movement and the
decision to invade Libya. This set Trump apart from both Clinton and the
rest of the Republican field of primary candidates.
And then there was simply the way he talked about Russia and his
openness to working with the country.
"I believe an easing of tensions, and improved relations with Russia
from a position of strength only, is possible, absolutely possible,"
Trump said in a foreign policy speech at the Mayflower Hotel on April
27, 2016, in Washington, D.C. "Common sense says this cycle, this
horrible cycle of hostility must end and ideally will end soon. Good for
both countries. Some say the Russians won't be reasonable. I intend to
find out."
Sergey Kislyak, then the Russian ambassador to the U.S., was sitting in
the front row, according to a report by Radio Free Europe.
The U.S. intelligence assessment says that by May 2016, Russian hackers
had extracted large volumes of data from the Democratic National
Committee's systems.
June 2016
In early June, as the primaries in both parties were winding down,
Clinton turned her fire to Trump. In a speech that marked her pivot
toward the general election, she mocked Trump for saying so many nice
things about Putin.
"Now I will leave it to psychiatrists to explain his affection for
tyrants," Clinton said in San Diego on June 2. "I just wonder how anyone
could be so wrong about who America's real friends are. Because it
matters. If you don't know exactly who you're dealing with, men like
Putin will eat your lunch."
That week, and the week after, are now under intense scrutiny.
Just a day after Clinton's speech, Donald Trump Jr. received the now
notorious email from a man linked to a Russian real estate developer
whom the Trumps had partnered with on the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in
Moscow. He offered to connect the Trump campaign with people who could
supply official Russian documents that would incriminate Clinton. The
offer was said to be part of "Russia and its government's support for
Mr. Trump."
Trump Jr. was traveling at the time, but it took him just 20 minutes to
reply: "if it's what you say, I love it, especially later in the summer."
Four days later, on June 7, was the end of the 2016 Republican
presidential primaries. In a speech to his supporters that night,
candidate Trump said something that is getting a lot of attention now:
He teased an attack on Clinton.
"I am going to give a major speech on, probably Monday of next week, and
we are going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place
with the Clintons," Trump said. "I think you are going to find it very
informative and very, very interesting."
When asked whether this had anything to do with what was promised in the
email chain, a spokesman for President Trump's outside legal team said
the candidate "was not aware of and did not attend the meeting."
Two days later, on June 9, the meeting happened at Trump Tower as
planned — with Donald Trump Jr., then-Trump campaign chairman Paul
Manafort and Jared Kushner, President Trump's son-in-law, who is now a
top White House adviser, all in attendance. Trump Jr.'s explanation of
who else was in that meeting has evolved over time, but those also in
attendance included a Russian lawyer, a Russian-American lobbyist and at
least one language interpreter.
Trump Jr. told Sean Hannity on Fox News that the Russians didn't deliver
what they promised in the meeting. "It was literally just a wasted 20
minutes, which was a shame," Trump Jr. said.
His father didn't end up delivering that major speech either [Trump was
aware of the meeting?], at least not on the day he promised. The Pulse
Nightclub shooting that left nearly 50 people dead happened in Orlando,
Fla., over that weekend and briefly shifted the focus of the campaign.
Something else happened that weekend that didn't seem all that
significant at the time. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange made an
announcement.
"We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton, which is great,"
he said, in an interview with Britain's ITV. "We actually have,
WikiLeaks has, a very big year ahead."
Assange and WikiLeaks have long had an ideological affinity and close
ties with Russia.
WikiLeaks had been posting the already-public Clinton State Department
emails on its website. What people were wondering was whether WikiLeaks
had the roughly 30,000 personal emails Clinton had deleted from her
private server. Assange was cagey when asked about that and, as a
result, many assumed he was just blowing smoke.
But then a few days later, a site called DCLeaks and someone going by
the name Guccifer 2.0 released some files taken from the DNC's systems.
At the time, Trump blamed the DNC for its own misfortune.
"We believe it was the DNC that did the 'hacking' as a way to distract
from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed
party leader," Trump said in a statement. "Too bad the DNC doesn't hack
Crooked Hillary's 33,000 missing emails."
The U.S. intelligence assessment says with high confidence that DCLeaks
and Guccifer 2.0 were just a front for Russia's military intelligence
agency the GRU.
"It's very clear that the GRU was responsible for hacking into the — the
networks of the DNC, DCCC, and were responsible, through a cutout,
releasing it through places like Guccifer 2.0, WikiLeaks and — and
others," former CIA Director John Brennan testified before the Senate
Intelligence Committee.
He said the GRU delivered to WikiLeaks thousands of DNC emails, as well
as those taken from senior Democratic officials, like Clinton campaign
chairman John Podesta.
On June 22, Trump finally delivered a speech going after Clinton and her
family's foundation, but there were no major revelations. It was sort of
a greatest hits version of previous attacks he had made against her.
July 2016
July was always going to be a momentous month in the campaign, with vice
presidential picks being announced and the parties' conventions
happening in Cleveland and Philadelphia. But it turned out to be pivotal.
In early July 2016, Carter Page went to Moscow to deliver a speech. He
was a minor figure in the Trump campaign, a policy adviser few people
had ever heard of before Trump mentioned him in an editorial board
meeting with The Washington Post.
We now know July is also the month the FBI began investigating possible
ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, though the public wouldn't
find out until well after the election.
In Cleveland, on July 21, one year ago this coming weekend, Donald Trump
closed out the GOP convention with a dark speech that fired up his
supporters.
"This is the legacy of Hillary Clinton: death, destruction, terrorism
and weakness," he said to rousing applause and cheers.
July 2016
July was always going to be a momentous month in the campaign, with vice
presidential picks being announced and the parties' conventions
happening in Cleveland and Philadelphia. But it turned out to be pivotal.
In early July 2016, Carter Page went to Moscow to deliver a speech. He
was a minor figure in the Trump campaign, a policy adviser few people
had ever heard of before Trump mentioned him in an editorial board
meeting with The Washington Post.
We now know July is also the month the FBI began investigating possible
ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, though the public wouldn't
find out until well after the election.
In Cleveland, on July 21, one year ago this coming weekend, Donald Trump
closed out the GOP convention with a dark speech that fired up his
supporters.
"This is the legacy of Hillary Clinton: death, destruction, terrorism
and weakness," he said to rousing applause and cheers.
Trump tweeted about the DNC hack repeatedly, including a "joke" that
maybe it had happened "because Putin likes me."
The Russian propaganda machine — including RT, the Russian
government-sponsored, English language television channel that is beamed
into homes all over America — had an undeniable message at the time.
"Speaking of crime and Internet and fame and money and politicians, one
immediately thinks of Hillary Clinton," said one RT announcer.
On July 25, a reporter on the state-run channel argued that any focus on
Russian involvement in the email leak was just a distraction from the
real issue — how terribly unfair the DNC had been to Sanders.
"When immediately after the leaks, the Clinton campaign began to blame
Russia instead of addressing the revelations in the leaks, to many it
sounded like a joke, like something you would see in the Onion fake
news," said RT reporter Gayane Chichakyan. "Except it was real news."
On July 27, Trump held a press conference and was asked whether he would
call on Putin to stay out of the election.
"Why should I tell Putin what to do?" Trump said, before turning to a
talking point used by both Trump's campaign and Russian media outlets.
"Let me tell you, it's not even about Russia or China or whoever it is
that's doing the hacking. It's about what was said in those emails.
Those were terrible things."
Rather than condemn the hacking, at his press conference Trump seemingly
encouraged Russia to keep going.
"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000
emails that are missing," Trump said, referring to Clinton's deleted
personal emails. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our
press. Let's see if that happens. That will be next."
After that, a reporter pressed Trump on whether he had any qualms about
asking a foreign government to interfere or to hack.
"Nope. Gives me no pause. If they have them, they have them," he said.
The personal emails deleted from Clinton's private server still haven't
surfaced publicly. But, in early October, WikiLeaks began posting a new
batch of internal Clinton campaign emails each day. And it was rewarded
mightily with a constant stream of negative stories about Clinton.
Clint Watts, Robert A. Fox Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research
Institute, began raising alarms about Russian measures to influence the
American public's political views shortly after Trump's press conference.
"Once you see both the campaign echoing the messages and themes that are
coming out from RT and Sputnik News, when you see hacked materials of
the DNC strategically linked and timed in terms of their release to
influence the U.S. election in favor of Trump, then when you see Trump
get onto stages or make prepared speeches where he refers to both Russia
and Clinton's emails, it seems very ominous, in terms of maybe there was
some connection between the two," said Watts. "At a minimum, they were
at least looking or aware of those lines or influenced by Russian
propaganda to be saying it almost near verbatim throughout those months."
Whether Trump was a witting or unwitting beneficiary of Russia's efforts
hasn't been proven, but as Watts sees it, Russia benefited from the way
candidate Trump ran his campaign.
"The bottom line is Russian active measures were deployed to influence
the U.S. election," Watts said, referring to the effort to discredit the
political system and turn voters against Clinton. "They worked in large
part because one candidate used Russian active measures to his own benefit."
http://www.npr.org/2017/07/17/537323120/timeline-of-trump-and-russia-in-mid-2016-a-series-of-coincidences-or-something-m
0 new messages