Slam me here if you will, but I gotta believe that if Serena or Venus
squared off with MacEnroe, Mac would probably come away an easy
winner.
Scott Baker
http://www.tennis4you.com
Forum = http://pub141.ezboard.com/ftennis4yougeneraltennis
--
"if federal judges have the final word over its meaning,
the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands
of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form
they please".
- Thomas Jefferson
"gp calliauw" <geert.c...@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:GjBMb.8990$m05.3...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Not to mention he still beat the world no #2.
e.g., what's the point of posting that i think henin will win her first
round AO match against some #150 qualifier?
--
"if federal judges have the final word over its meaning,
the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands
of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form
they please".
- Thomas Jefferson
"gp calliauw" <geert.c...@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:_KBMb.9039$P25.3...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
You forgot Billie Jean King thrashing Bobby Riggs in 1973.
:-)
Max Eberl
> since the only man who ever lost to a woman was in his 60s, that's not a
> very risky prediction.
Want to qualify that? Even *I* have beaten men. Not very *good* men,
certainly...
wg
I thought it was obvious that i was referring to these matchups between pros
(connors/mn, court/riggs, etc.).
Riggs was 55 when he was beaten by King ....
Max Eberl
"Calimero" <calim...@yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:47f19a44.04011...@posting.google.com...
And Billie Jean was less than half that.
"Veeraraghavan T. E." <vee...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bu1eii$hn3$1...@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
theo
> Want to qualify that? Even *I* have beaten men.
And you're not on the Tour, Wendy? Quick! Register yourself with the WTA!
> And that same year he destroyed Margaret Court in straight sets, same
year
> that MC won 3 of 4 GS.....
Yeah, BJK was so much better than Court that year...........or did Bobby
deteriorate badly in the few months between the two matches?
Um, that's who he was talking about dickhead.
Right after he thrasedh world no #2 Margaret Court.
Nah, they'll say if I can beat men I must be using steroids.
wg
Riggs was 55 in 1973, fuckwit.
Not in his 60s in my book ....
You're a slow-burner, yes?
Max Eberl
I hope he did, because that is the worst quality tennis I have ever
seen televised. Has anyone who has seen that match been at all
impressed with the level of play? The absolute mediocrity of it
really makes me wonder if Riggs threw it. He couldn't have been that
nearly that bad and beat court so easily, could he? And BJK didn't
look too great either. Dink....dink...dink
> The absolute mediocrity of it
> really makes me wonder if Riggs threw i
More likely that Court, as has often been said, was a mental flake in her
match against him and let him psych her out. Which he was an expert at.
wg
******************
didn't people say Riggs was woefully underprepared for the BJK match? Too
much partying.
And yea, MSC totally lost it for her match, though she claimed later she
didn't expect Riggs shots to be as *weak* as they were,,,,,must have upset
her timing....;O)
Theo
Yes, Mac would still cut it in men's doubles today, so should beat
sistas....
Because it's wasting bandwidth to state the obvious?
eg 'Sampras is probably the best grasscourter of 90's' is a waste of
bandwidth....
What, in tennis.....?
This is rst, so you need to spell things out.... ; )
You've been wasting bandwidth for years by posting here and wasting
oxygen for your entire life by breathing.
>
If they were good, why would you have to beat them....?
Gotcha. I thought you meant sadomasochism.........