On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 15:22:22 UTC+5:30, Whisper wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 5:43 AM, Gracchus wrote:
> > Ahahahhahhahahhahahhahhahaha!
> >
> > Everyone who went on about his "French Open form" carrying though to a Wimbledon championship must feel very, very foolish right now. :)))))))))
> >
> >
>
>
> Why?
>
> All players have a bad match during a slam. Sometimes it gets away from
> them & they lose.
>
I see. So while every Fed loss at a slam is a 'career-defining loss',
Rafa gets an exemption as a 'bad match' to be ignored. How predictable
can you get? You make a big deal of Fed being taken to 5 sets (ignoring
that he won the match) by an older Agassi at USO but when Rafa (your
pick to beat Fed in straights in the final!) loses yet another 5 setter
to an unheralded Muller despite being in the best form since 2013, you
just brush it off as a 'bad match' of no consequence!
Do you realize why you are not taken seriously?