On 9/18/2017 3:34 PM,
calim...@gmx.de wrote:
> On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 9:31:23 PM UTC+2, StephenJ wrote:
>> On 9/18/2017 12:03 PM,
calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 1:09:30 PM UTC+2, Whisper wrote:
>>>> On 18/09/2017 8:53 PM, soccerfan777 wrote:
>>>>> No what it stays is Serena player for 6 more years and one 1 more slam than Steffi. Not very impressive.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It demonstrates absolute goat/boat credentials, being good enough to
>>>> wins slams over many eras.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>>
http://www.avg.com
>>>
>>>
>>> You may say 'best ever" since no one knows whether peak Steffi would have beaten peak Serena.
>>> But not "greatest ever".
>>
>> Serena is greatest ever in the sense of having the best tennis
>> accomplishments.
>
> Even that is debatable.
> What is the difference between 23 and 22 slams. Not a lot. Just a win more against Safarova or Wozniacki types.
> What is the difference between a Golden Grand Slam and nothing? The whole world. A legendary record most probably never to be duplicated.
>
>
>
>> Whether she would have the moral bad character to shamelessly rack up
>> slam wins after the rival who dominated the slams for the previous 3
>> years was stabbed by a fan desperate for her to be #1 again, no one
>> knows, but i doubt it.
>>
>
> Which great rival did she have?