Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Derek
derekm at airmial dot net
1. I find nothing surprising in giving the suit size as the reason for
quitting. However, is it the real reason or just a convenient excuse. It
would be most interesting to compare competition success with quitting.
2. As a kid during hot Dallas summers I was given the choice of swimming or
playing baseball. To me it was a no brainer, cool pool. I don't get baseball
over swimming but that is just me. By the way I stink at the baseball, but the
real reason is that I didn't like the uniforms.
Bob
I'm going to make a rather bold statement. I don't think
it's the exposure issue. I think if there is a social problem, it's
that the competitive swimsuit (generically called a "Speedo") has
become associated with male homosexuals. Thus, mean little 13-year
old boys (and this is where pressure to conform to the "group" is at
its highest, as is uncertainty about sexuality and concerns about
body image) can attack anyone in a well-known taunting style that
is part of adolescence. Many years back when I was a 13-year old
swimmer, this wasn't a common association, but it is now. I think it
would be really tough for a 13-year old to handle. All those
references in these other articles about the fact that sports like
soccer, basketball, baseball, etc. are "manly" underscore the likelihood
of this association in the minds of young teenagers.
I want to state clearly that the above is not really an issue
of sexuality, homo- or hetero-. It's about 13-year old boys that make
fun of each other in any way that they can.
===============================================
| James G. Acker |
| REPLY TO: jga...@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov |
===============================================
All comments are the personal opinion of the writer
and do not constitute policy and/or opinion of government
or corporate entities.
An extremely important point that plays into the psychology somehow.
A guy not wanting to be around almost naked chicks? Doesn't figure.
Bob
As for suit size, my son age 12 doesn't mind the small size, but wears an
Aquablade Jammer for competition. He wears it because it's different and he
like to stand out in a crowd. But the new longer suits do offer an option
for the shy.
John
Alex Mericas <alex_m...@ibm.net> wrote in message
news:37B41548...@ibm.net...
> I agree that the swimsuit is just an excuse. I have two nephews in that
> age group that swim. One was thinking about quitting to play basketball.
> My reaction was "you would pass up an opportunity to be around all those
> girls in swimsuits?". I doubt that made the difference, but he is still
> swimming! From a social aspect, swimming is the best sport for teenage
> boys!
>
> Richard Osness wrote:
> >
However, I think other reasons are more important in why boys quit.
Swimming isn't casual; if you want to swim, you do it in an organized
structure or league. Basketball, you pick up a ball, get together with some
friends and shoots some hoops. Football, you find a field and throw the
ball around. Other sports are more accessible for casual play, not just the
serious athlete. Plus, I think kids look for sports that are more
team-based and social. Swimming is social too but I mean social in the
sense that you can't play football by yourself while you can swim alone.
Peter
James G. Acker <jga...@news.gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:7p1alq$i...@post.gsfc.nasa.gov...
Don
David Spera wrote in message <37B56016...@sgi.net>...
Well maybe, but the same kid who thinks swimming is too organized, would
give anything to be on a football, baseball or soccer team -- all highly
organized, even regimented sports -- even if it means sitting on the
bench or being a walking tackling dummy.
I don't think the speedo is "just" an excuse, but I do think there's
more to it than just the size of the suit. Even if all the teams were
to adopt "aquablade jammers" or even full body suits, swimming would
have an image problem with some thirteen year olds.
Kids that age are very self-conscious about their bodies. But they're
also about afraid of being seen as uncool. The problem, which I think
the speedo only symbolizes, is that swimming has not in recent years
been publicized as a male sport. The only male swimmer that registers
in many people's minds is still Mark Spitz, after more than a
quarter-century.
USAS has done a good job of publicizing stars like Janet Evans, Summer
Sanders and Amy Van Dyken, but they seem content to have the male
swimmers treated in the media, if at all, only as afterthoughts or as
soap opera characters. Just look at the last Olympics -- the coverage
of American male swimmers focused on Tom Dolan's asthma and Gary Hall's
grandfather, rather on Dolan or Hall as athletes. Very little was heard
about athletes like Jeff Rouse, who had no "story." These were good
stories for NBC, but they're not what appeals to thirteen year old boys.
What this tells them is that swimming is a sport for girls or for boys
with problems -- exactly what they most fear. Small swimsuits would be
much less of an issue, if the sport did a better job of promoting itself
as a male sport.
Ken
http://community.webtv.net/kenchert/KensPlace
> I don't think anyone would disagree about speedos being seen as a gay thing
> by kids. They say that all the time about why they don't wear them on the
> beach: "that is so gay!"
I'd disagree! Kids say "that is so gay!" about a lot of things. But they
usually don't mean it literally, and very few of their peers think they do.
I WOULD agree, though, that boys who have never worn competitive swim suits
frequently imagine that wearing one would be a lot more embarrassing than it
really is. But that is more a reason why boys never join swim teams to begin
with - not a reason why they quit.
> However, I think other reasons are more important in why boys quit.
> Swimming isn't casual; if you want to swim, you do it in an organized
> structure or league. Basketball, you pick up a ball, get together with some
> friends and shoots some hoops. Football, you find a field and throw the
> ball around. Other sports are more accessible for casual play, not just the
> serious athlete. Plus, I think kids look for sports that are more
> team-based and social. Swimming is social too but I mean social in the
> sense that you can't play football by yourself while you can swim alone.
Actually, swimming for fun is about as casual as doing any other sport for fun.
Of course, you do have to have a pool available. But I've seen neighborhoods
where back yard swimming pools were more common than basketball hoops.
Now, it could be argued that most kids who swim casually don't race. But it
could also be argued that most kids who shoot hoops or throw a football around
aren't really doing anything that very closely resembles organized basketball or
football. And it certainly isn't uncommon for kids who are splashing around in
a swimming pool to take some time out and have a race.
Bob
> Well maybe, but the same kid who thinks swimming is too organized, would
> give anything to be on a football, baseball or soccer team -- all highly
> organized, even regimented sports -- even if it means sitting on the
> bench or being a walking tackling dummy.
I agree. And I think a lot of it has to do with the amount of attention
that is given to these sports on TV and in schools. Boys' football and
basketball games at most high schools are made into major school events,
complete with refreshment stands, cheerleaders, the band playing at
half-time, etc. It's easy to see why a boy might prefer that to a sport
that takes a lot of work, but that isn't attended by anyone except parents
and other team members. All of this is less important for girls, because
women's sports usually don't attract much attention regardless of what they
are (except, maybe, for women's tennis, which seems to get as many
spectators as men's tennis).
What's particularly sad about this is that swimming is one of the best forms
of exercise around, and it's one that can be done for your entire life.
But, once you get out of college, it's well-nigh impossible to find a
football team to play on unless you're good enough to turn pro.
> USAS has done a good job of publicizing stars like Janet Evans, Summer
> Sanders and Amy Van Dyken, but they seem content to have the male
> swimmers treated in the media, if at all, only as afterthoughts or as
> soap opera characters. Just look at the last Olympics -- the coverage
> of American male swimmers focused on Tom Dolan's asthma and Gary Hall's
> grandfather, rather on Dolan or Hall as athletes. Very little was heard
> about athletes like Jeff Rouse, who had no "story." These were good
> stories for NBC, but they're not what appeals to thirteen year old boys.
> What this tells them is that swimming is a sport for girls or for boys
> with problems -- exactly what they most fear. Small swimsuits would be
> much less of an issue, if the sport did a better job of promoting itself
> as a male sport.
Actually, I doubt that the average kid who isn't on a swim team has ever
heard of any contemporary swimming star - male or female.
Bob
I agree, but I think the reason for that is the way the sport is
publicized. Kids would be more aware of the swimmers if the sport were
more aggressively promoted, with emphasis on the athletic competition.
Ken
http://community.webtv.net/kenchert/KensPlace
And us Brits get told we've got hang-ups...
Seriously, if swimming is taught properly, talent is nurtured (*not*
forced), swimming will continue to thrive. Anybody who starts coming up with
lame-brain excuses (water too cold, suit too tight etc) really is saying
they don't want to do it.
Mick
(PS- if you're an endomorph, speedos are just the ticket for wearing whilst
chatting to your female team-mates... )
Here in Austin, Josh Davis gets lots of good press. And he deserves it.
He came to my kid's swim team awards night last year and passed around
his gold medals! Now my kids know who he is and whenever we see an article
about him, we all read it.