Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

What did Psychiatrists say about these Technologies and Targeted Individuals/Torture Victims

Skip to first unread message


May 8, 2022, 4:42:43 PM5/8/22


What did Psychologists, Psychiatrists say about these technologies and
how Targeted Individuals/Torture Victims are being harassed, stalked and

Many Psychologists and Psychiatrists did research and published columns
describing Mind Invasive Technologies and how Military Intelligence
Agencies are harassing, stalking and torturing american and global public.

Psychologist Carole Smith CLEARLY explained that the Perpetrators STALK
their victims and remind them of being in constant control and surveillance.

The following column is long and hence I reproduced "important excerpts"

MIND INVASIVE TECHNOLOGY – by Psychologist Ms Carole Smith

In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book:
“Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society”. In
essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of
electrical stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its
relations between different points and activities, functions and
sensations, – by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of
breathing and heartbeat could be changed, as well as the function of
most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion. Frowning, opening and
closing of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic
seizures in healthy persons were induced. The intensity of feelings
could be controlled by turning the knob, which controlled the intensity
of the electric current. He states at the end of his book the hope that
the new power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite
for the benefit of a “psychocivilized society.”

“Part of the effort is to remind the victim that they are constantly
under control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common forms of
reminders are electronic prods and nudges, body noises, twinges and
cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs – all with a "PERSONALLY CODIFIED SYSTEM of
COMMENTS on THOUGHTS and EVENTS", designed to create stress, panic and
desperation. This is mind control at its most benign.”

Here are some examples of the Perpetrators STALKING me on internet and
REMINDING ME of surveillance and THREATENING ME that they will TORTURE
ME UNTIL I commit suicide, just like Psychologist Ms. Carole Smith
stated in her Pulitzer deserving column:

I used a pseudonym "Jason Gillespie" but the perpetrators still knew and
responded to me.

Shadow US Govt CIA NSA FBI DHS Psychopath bhandava THREAT 4

Shadow US Govt CIA NSA FBI DHS Psychopath bhandava THREATS 1-3

The calculated and technological entry into another person’s mind is an
act of monumental barbarism which obliterates– perhaps with the
twiddling of a dial – the history and civilisation of man’s mental
development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the
destruction of meaning. For any one who is forced into the hell of
living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond
the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the
ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to
come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps.
We now have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who
issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction
of societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going
to the opera.

Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an
abbreviated assessment of the effects that mind-invaded people
describe testifies to the perverted nature of the experiments. Bizarre
noises are emitted from the body, a body known well enough by its owner
to recognise the noises as extrinsic; air is pumped in and out of
orifices as if by a bicycle pump. Gradually the repertoire is augmented
– twinges and spasms to the eyes, nose, lips, strange tics, pains in the
head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in the throat, pressure on the
bowel and bladder causing incontinence; tingling in the fingers, feet,
pressures on the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye problems leading to
cataracts; running eyes, running nose; speeding up of heart beats and
the raising of pressure in the heart and chest; breathing and chest
complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs;
agonizing migraines; being woken up at night, sometimes with terrifying
jolts ; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the loss of one’s
privacy. This collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any
medical practitioner to diagnose.

Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says:
“It is easily conceivable that some ‘Satan’, as long as he owns the
appropriate means and finances, can inject himself into every
conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television
broadcast, with relative technological ease, even without disconnecting
cables…and intercept the radio waves in the ether and modulate every
conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such technology is
rightfully feared.”(German TV documentary, 1998).

If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for
evidence of weapons of mass destruction, we conclude that failure to
locate them – whatever the truth of the matter –encourages us to be
generally complacent, then we shall be colluding with very dark forces
at work if we conclude that a course of extreme vigilance signifies
paranoia. For there may well be other weapons of mass destruction being
developed and not so far from home; weapons which, being even more
difficult to locate, are developed invisibly, unobstructed, unheeded in
our midst, using human beings as test-beds. Like ESP, the methods being
used on humans have not been detectable using conventional detection
equipment. It is likely that the signals being used are part of a
physics not known to scientists without the highest level of security
clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with
catastrophic results, the only evidence which might otherwise lead the
defenders of freedom to becoming alert to the development of a fearful
new methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and
governments alike, these sinister and covert forces may well be very
thankful for the professional derision of the victims, and for public

French National Bioethics Committee Chairman Jean Pierre Changeux

In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National
Bioethics Committee was held in Paris. Its chairman, Jean-Pierre
Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the
meeting that “advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion
of privacy immense. Although the equipment needed is still highly
specialized, it will become commonplace and capable of being used at a
distance. That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal
liberty, control of behaviour and brainwashing. These are far from being
science-fiction concerns…and constitute “a serious risk to society.”
(“Nature.” Vol 391, 1998.

In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen,
was quoted (US News and World Report, 2000) as hoping to turn the
electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science fact. Dr
Norseen, a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed
from reading a Soviet book in the 1980’s claiming that research on the
mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. By a process
of deciphering the brain’s electrical activity, electromagnetic
pulsations would trigger the release of the brain’s own transmitters to
fight off disease, enhance learning, or alter the mind’s visual images,
creating a ‘synthetic reality’. By this process of BioFusion, (Lockheed
Martin, 2000) information is placed in a database, and a composite model
of the brain is created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by
(functional) magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists can
tell what the person was doing at the time of recording – say reading or
writing, or recognise emotions from love to hate. “If this research pans
out”, says Norseen, “you can begin to manipulate what someone is
thinking even before they know it.” But Norseen says he is ‘agnostic’ on
the moral ramifications, that he’s not a mad scientist – just a
dedicated one. “The ethics don’t concern me,” he says, “but they should
concern someone else.”

Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory at
Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada:

His article “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain
by Electromagnetic Induction of Algorithms” (1995), he describes the
ways that individual differences among human brains can be overcome and
comes to a conclusion about the technological possibilities of
influencing a major part of the approximately six billion people on this
planet without mediation through classical sensory modalities but by
generating electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms in the
atmosphere. Dr Persinger’s work is referred to by Captain John Tyler
whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace programmes likens
the human nervous system to a radio receiver. (1990)


May 8, 2022, 5:30:02 PM5/8/22
In article <5XVdK.7591$VwRc...@fx01.iad>
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer <> wrote:



May 9, 2022, 4:56:41 AM5/9/22
0 new messages