I was proselytizing on the righteousness of squash amongst some heathen
[non-squash players] and mentioned the size of the ball. A discussion on
the size of the ball ensued - we were wondering if the squash ball is
the
smallest ball played in a competitive sport [we ignored marbles]. The
discussion ran into size limits on balls that are handled/thrown/caught
versus those that are primarily hit [like a golf or tennis ball].
Anyone care to comment? I doubt that there'll be much of a market for
bumper stickers with tongue-in-cheek references to size!
Donn
Donn Young, Ohio State University Cancer Center
>Dear folks,
>Donn
The last time I played squash at Ohio State (1973) it was in a
raquetball court, with a very large ball! Glad things have improved (I
gather!) On that glorious occasion, it was my honour to finish 5th in
the OSU squash championships- you guessed it, there were exactly 5
entrants! I was also the only Caucasian in the badminton club; has
that changed, too?
Dave Macmurchie
Thetis Island, BC
http://www.island.net/~dmacmurc/
I haven't got one to hand, but a Table Tennis ("Ping-Pong") ball must be
about the same size, or maybe smaller than a Squash ball!
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan George - Hewlett-Packard Ltd, Pinewood
A regulation squash ball is 39.5 mm.
A ping-pong ball might be a bit smaller. I would venture a guess that squash
balls have the highest initial projectile velocity of any racquet sport.
Any data out there?
--
Kirk Marat, PhD - NMR Facility Manager | Resolved: the csh is a tool
Dept. of Chemistry / Prairie Regional NMR Centre| utterly inadequate for pro-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, CANADA | gramming, and it use for such
ph: (204) 474-6259, FAX: (204) 275-0905 | purposes should be banned.
>In article <327126...@osu.edu> "Donn C. Young" <you...@osu.edu> writes:
>>the size of the ball ensued - we were wondering if the squash ball is
>>the
>>smallest ball played in a competitive sport [we ignored marbles].
>well ignoring Shot from shooting I'd suspect that a table tennis ball is just
>smaller.
Correct weight.
Sport Ball Diameter
--------------- ------------------------------
Table Tennis 38.2mm (1.5inch)
Squash 39.5 - 41.5mm
Handball 48mm
Head of shuttlecock 28mm (full length 70mm)
Golf UK 41.1mm (1.62inch)
Golf US 42.6mm (1.68inch) (also Canada, International)
Dunno whether the UK/US golf differences are still true.
Note that the Boccie jack is 37mm according to my reference but it has
nothing on marbles - sigh.
Regards.
Mad Hamish wrote:
>
> In article <327126...@osu.edu> "Donn C. Young" <you...@osu.edu> writes:
> >the size of the ball ensued - we were wondering if the squash ball is
> >the
> >smallest ball played in a competitive sport [we ignored marbles].
>
> well ignoring Shot from shooting I'd suspect that a table tennis ball is just
> smaller.
>
> ****************************************************************************
> The Politician's Slogan
> 'You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all
> of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
> Fortunately only a simple majority is required.'
> ****************************************************************************
>
> Mad Hamish
>
> Hamish Laws
> h_l...@postoffice.sandybay.utas.edu.au
--
Glen Lochhead
Maths Dept, UQ, Aus, 4072
E-MAIL: mailto:g...@maths.uq.oz.au
WWW: http://www.maths.uq.oz.au/~gwl
>
> Sport Ball Diameter
> --------------- ------------------------------
> Table Tennis 38.2mm (1.5inch)
>
> Squash 39.5 - 41.5mm
>
> Handball 48mm
>
> Head of shuttlecock 28mm (full length 70mm)
>
> Golf UK 41.1mm (1.62inch)
> Golf US 42.6mm (1.68inch) (also Canada, International)
> Dunno whether the UK/US golf differences are still true.
>
>
> Note that the Boccie jack is 37mm according to my reference but it has
> nothing on marbles - sigh.
>
Do we really want to advertise the fact that squash players have the
smallest balls in sport?
Paul
I don't know for sure, but a badminton shuttlecock may travel faster than a
squash ball.
--
----------S t r a n g e r D a n g e r G r o u p
----------http://www.truck.fl.net.au/
That being said, there's a sport called Racquets which may have a
smaller ball than any of the ones mentioned. The ball is as hard
as a rock, and is not necessarily perfectly round.
I don't want to prejudge, but it seems like a pretty ridiculous
game.
>I don't know for sure, but a badminton shuttlecock may travel faster than
a
>squash ball.
Hard Racquets probably has it over both of them in initial projectile
velocity. Consider hitting a small golf ball with a racquet a couple
inches longer than a squash racquet. That and you're hitting it against a
slate wall. VERY VERY fast game. Not too many courts around though.
Doug Stone
--
Harmon A. Pierce II
BOSS integration - SWS - IBM
hapi...@vnet.ibm.com
(507) 253-2911
Cheers
Anthony
>--
I tried this game once. I would not recommend it without a
referee and a LaCrosse. Helmet. Doug is right, the ball is a
small golf ball and the court is a squash players nightmare.
Can you imagine what a golf ball does on slate?
Marc S. Fuller
CVRTI, University of Utah