On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 12:03:32 AM UTC+2, Real Mardin wrote:
> On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 5:15:21 PM UTC+1, Werner Pichler wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:37:50 PM UTC+2, Real Mardin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 9:08:45 PM UTC+1, Binder Dundat wrote:
> > > > Since the beginning of time people have debated whether the Europa League or the Europa Confrence League is better.
> > >
> > > More to the point - has the Conference League achieved what it set out to? Perhaps judgement shouldn't be made after only one season but the last 8 seems to have a lot of Europa League level sides and not the
> > > "third tier" European sides I thought the tournament was supposed to be giving a chance to?
> > Personally, I'd say so. The last time one of the eight remaining teams in the competition has won a UEFA title
> > was Feyenoord in the 2001/02 UEFA Cup, and they haven't reached a European quarterfinal since. It's exactly that
> > kind of team, usually eliminated in the CL round of 16 or the EL semifinals at the latest (sole exception Marseille),
> > that the competition was designed for.
>
> I've looked back at some articles from when the competition was first mooted and I'm not sure the competition was originally designed for teams like Feyenoord. The early talk was of a competition possibly
> exclusively for lower ranked nations to give their teams a chance of a run in Europe. It seems at some stage the idea changed to accommodate teams from the higher ranked nations and teams who've dropped out
> of the Europa League, which is why we have a last eight with 5 teams from top 10 UEFA club coefficient nations, with the other three coming from top 20 ranking nations.
It was designed to give the champions of these lower-ranked leagues a much bigger chance to reach a European group phase,
which it did - the champions of Gibraltar, Armenia and Estonia all featured for the first time in their association's history.
But except for those teams, I find the Conference League to be pretty close to the old Europa League strength-wise.
As was to be expected - with the Conference League the number of teams in a European group phase has increased from 80 to 96,
but those extra 16 teams come predominantly from among the champions of countries ranked above #20 (this year these were:
CRO, SWE, NOR, ISR, KAZ, BUL, ROM, POL, SLK, SLO, HUN, ARM, MDA, FIN, GIB, EST). (I say predominantly, because some of those
champions, like Dinamo Zagreb, might have made it to the group phase in previous years as well. But now these 16 spots are guaranteed.)
> If the competition had been kept as a genuine third tier tournament restricted to nations ranked (say) below 20, we may have had the opportunity to see teams from countries like Sweden
Norway not good enough for you? Last time a Norwegian team reached a quarterfinal was Vålerenga in the 1998-99
(last ever) Cup Winners' Cup (although Rosenborg's Champions League quarterfinal two years previously was more impressive),
and so far they've never managed to reach a semifinal. It's a historic chance for Bodø/Glimt - and one that would be seriously
diminished if the competition were as restricted as you suggested.
(Also, back then Vålerenga only had to win two rounds against the cup winners from Romania and Turkey to get to the QF.
Bodø/Glimt's achievement is far better.)
> Israel, Hungary, Bosnia or Finland
A team from Bosnia has so far never reached a European group phase, even under the current easy setup. Don't expect them to
fly high even if you cut out everyone above 20th place.
Generally, if you only want to see those teams between #20 and #55 slugging it out between themselves, may I suggest the early
qualifying rounds each summer where that's exactly what's happening? It's definitely my favourite part of the football season, but
even I wouldn't want to see the usual level of play there rewarded with a European trophy.
> have a run to the later stages of a European competition. If the first season is anything to go by it feels like it just gives teams from higher ranked nations who've under performed either the previous season or in the
> current season's Europa League
That might be applied, at most, to Leicester, PSV and Marseille, and two of those have been drawn against each other. Not so bad.
Ciao,
Werner