"Bruce D. Scott" escreveu:
> Clément wrote:
> : For a good portion of the season (and I'm not saying this because I
> dislike
> : them), they weren't looking good to even make the playoffs. Regardless
> of
> : what happens next, that's a remarkable turnaround they managed to
> achieve.
> : And, at this point, I'd not be willing to rule them out.
>
> OK, but I'd still be surprised if they beat the Rangers. Although, I
> may remember the 1980s a little too much :-)
I suspect the Caps have some historical playoff issues with a few teams, not
just the Rangers. =)
But of course it's precisely those teams they'll need to beat eventually if
they are going to win the Cup.
On paper, the Rangers are the best team, but I honestly believe this is a
great opportunity for the Caps. They are the one with little to lose.
The pressure should be on the Rangers, who not only were the #1 seed, but
also have to be encouraged by a relatively open field in these playoffs. We
all know that this doesn't necessarily mean a lot, but the Penguins have
crashed, and the Bruins are out. Not to mention the Red Wings (and Vancouver
to a lesser extent) in the West. Those were Stanley Cup-seasoned sides.
I'd have to take a deeper look, but I don't think any of the 8 remaining
rosters have a lot of Stanley Cup experience? Surely you have dinosaurs like
Jagr and Brodeur out there, but is there any remaining team with 3 or more
Stanley Cup rings in their roster?
[Of course I'm not making little of the remainining teams' quality. These
are good teams that deserve to be there. It's just the Cup experience aspect
I'm thinking about here.]
Abraço,
Luiz Mello