In fact...
ixion martin - GdBx
Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
--
Ixion
En coupe d'Europe, quand on dit diplomatiquement que l'arbitre
n'ï¿œtait pas dans un bon soir, c'est toujours le club franï¿œais
qui morfle.
Alkamista
> ... I cannot be really happy.
> Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
Worse than that, we'll have to see Domenech the slithering snake at
the WC again.
ixion martin - GdBx
> On Nov 18, 2:33ï¿œpm, ixion martin - GdBx
I don't matter with that.
--
Ixion
Contre une ï¿œquipe ï¿œtrangï¿œre, quand on dit diplomatiquement que
l'arbitre n'est pas dans un bon soir, c'est toujours le club
franï¿œais
qui morfle.
En sï¿œlection, c'est parfois l'inverse.
SHUSSBAR
> ... I cannot be really happy.
> Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
>
> --
> Ixion
> En coupe d'Europe, quand on dit diplomatiquement que l'arbitre
> qui morfle.
Sorry yes. Deserve to qualify more? In the first half of the 2 games
for sure, they created panic. After, we controlled them and benefited
from a ref mistake.
Bruce D. Scott
: ... I cannot be really happy.
: Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
That's the spirit. I don't like it when my team does it dirty either
(still recall a match in Dortmund when we did 9 yellow cards in the
first half trying to eliminate Tomas Rosicky, clearly because we feared
losing).
--
ciao,
Bruce
drift wave turbulence: http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~bds/
Chagney Hunt
Dude, I got your point. You detest Raymond Domenech's coaching
ability, but what's with the name calling?
Bob
Gratuitous Domenech bashing seems to be the norm these days.
Chagney Hunt
Oh, please, the world doesn't revolve around Domenech or France, at
least Alkamista's world doesn't. You are rss' equivalence of right-
winged Israeli lobbyists, Bob.
Bob
> On Nov 19, 6:43 pm, "Bob" <B...@Bob.com> wrote:
>> Chagney Hunt wrote:
>>> On Nov 18, 5:37 pm, Alkamista <alkami...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, ixion martin - GdBx <ix...@martin.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> ... I cannot be really happy.
>>>>> Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
>>
>>>> Worse than that, we'll have to see Domenech the slithering snake at
>>>> the WC again.
>>
>>> Dude, I got your point. You detest Raymond Domenech's coaching
>>> ability, but what's with the name calling?
>>
>> Gratuitous Domenech bashing seems to be the norm these days.
>
> Oh, please, the world doesn't revolve around Domenech or France, at
> least Alkamista's world doesn't.
whether it does or not, he certainly has a habbit of gratuitiously bashing
Domenech like many others out there
You are rss' equivalence of right-
> winged Israeli lobbyists, Bob.
moron.
Chagney Hunt
That response was expected.
Bob
no need to play holier than thou after you hurled your veiled insults
Chagney Hunt
And you promtly proved my point.
Bob
as if your rhetoric had a point beside stroking your large ego.
Chagney Hunt
Which was hard to do because we weren't talking about me.
Bob
there are multiple ways to stroke one's ego beside talking about oneself;
putting people down is one of them.
Chagney Hunt
How is putting down perhaps the most tedious person on usenet stroking
one's own ego? Sounds more like masochism.
Alkamista
Because he slithered his way out of yet another sacking. He's the
colloquial B-movie monster.
Alkamista
These days?? Where have you been, it's been the norm for quite a while
now. In fact, I think you and the head of the FFF might be the only
two people left in the world who still want to defend him. In fact, I
suspect that even if France had failed to qualify you would still
defend him. Or even if he was exposed as a MI6 agent tasked with
sabotaging France's national football setup, you would still think
that "he was still France's best option" :-)
Bob
> On Nov 19, 5:43 pm, "Bob" <B...@Bob.com> wrote:
>> Chagney Hunt wrote:
>>> On Nov 18, 5:37 pm, Alkamista <alkami...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, ixion martin - GdBx <ix...@martin.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> ... I cannot be really happy.
>>>>> Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
>>
>>>> Worse than that, we'll have to see Domenech the slithering snake at
>>>> the WC again.
>>
>>> Dude, I got your point. You detest Raymond Domenech's coaching
>>> ability, but what's with the name calling?
>>
>> Gratuitous Domenech bashing seems to be the norm these days.
>
> These days?? Where have you been, it's been the norm for quite a while
> now.
well, I didn't it was possible but the slanders may actually have gotten
worse in recent weeks with playoffs and whatnot.
> In fact, I think you and the head of the FFF might be the only
> two people left in the world who still want to defend him.
you mean that I have defended him against media slander? what's wrong with
that?
In fact, I
> suspect that even if France had failed to qualify you would still
> defend him.
it'll only be the 3rd time (or something like that) that I have to remind
you that I have been for his replacement whenever somebody adequate is
available for quite a while now. Are you willfully lying?
Chagney Hunt
> you mean that I have defended him against media slander? what's wrong with
> that?
Here we go again :-) Disagreeing with Bob = propagating media
slanders. Direct-line-to-truth been very busy lately, isn't it, Bob?
Alkamista
> Alkamista wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 5:43 pm, "Bob" <B...@Bob.com> wrote:
> >> Chagney Hunt wrote:
> >>> On Nov 18, 5:37 pm, Alkamista <alkami...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, ixion martin - GdBx <ix...@martin.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> ... I cannot be really happy.
> >>>>> Sorry for the Irish. They deserved the qualification.
>
> >>>> Worse than that, we'll have to see Domenech the slithering snake at
> >>>> the WC again.
>
> >>> Dude, I got your point. You detest Raymond Domenech's coaching
> >>> ability, but what's with the name calling?
>
> >> Gratuitous Domenech bashing seems to be the norm these days.
>
> > These days?? Where have you been, it's been the norm for quite a while
> > now.
>
> well, I didn't it was possible but the slanders may actually have gotten
> worse in recent weeks with playoffs and whatnot.
You were implying above that I've joined some new fad, while you are
well aware that I've been a Domenech antagonist for a long time now.
>
> > In fact, I think you and the head of the FFF might be the only
> > two people left in the world who still want to defend him.
>
> you mean that I have defended him against media slander? what's wrong with
> that?
Actually, you have defended him against just about anyhting. Why dont
you just come out of the closet and admit that you are a huge fan of
the man?
>
> In fact, I
>
> > suspect that even if France had failed to qualify you would still
> > defend him.
>
> it'll only be the 3rd time (or something like that) that I have to remind
> you that I have been for his replacement whenever somebody adequate is
> available for quite a while now. Are you willfully lying?
Yes of course you have. The only problem is, no one seems to be quite
better than him in your eyes, no matter how much France continues to
decline under him.
Jesper Lauridsen
>
> Gratuitous Domenech bashing seems to be the norm these days.
There's no such thing as gratuitous Domenech bashing. It's like nudity
in that respect.
Bob
> Actually, you have defended him against just about anyhting. Why dont
> you just come out of the closet and admit that you are a huge fan of
> the man?
I have mostly said that much of the criticism against him isn't compelling.
>> it'll only be the 3rd time (or something like that) that I have to
>> remind you that I have been for his replacement whenever somebody
>> adequate is available for quite a while now. Are you willfully lying?
>
> Yes of course you have. The only problem is, no one seems to be quite
> better than him in your eyes, no matter how much France continues to
> decline under him.
You are confusing 'available' within the context (they probably would only
hire a french coach) with 'better than him'. Replacing him Liverpool's
discards or even someone who'd provide marginal improvment are highly
debatable moves. But I have told you this several times already, so why are
you asking again?
Alkamista
> Alkamista wrote:
> > Actually, you have defended him against just about anyhting. Why dont
> > you just come out of the closet and admit that you are a huge fan of
> > the man?
>
> I have mostly said that much of the criticism against him isn't compelling.
What is not compelling about France's utterly shit form?
>
> >> it'll only be the 3rd time (or something like that) that I have to
> >> remind you that I have been for his replacement whenever somebody
> >> adequate is available for quite a while now. Are you willfully lying?
>
> > Yes of course you have. The only problem is, no one seems to be quite
> > better than him in your eyes, no matter how much France continues to
> > decline under him.
>
> You are confusing 'available' within the context (they probably would only
> hire a french coach) with 'better than him'. Replacing him Liverpool's
> discards or even someone who'd provide marginal improvment are highly
> debatable moves. But I have told you this several times already, so why are
> you asking again?
I'm not asking you anything. If you can't see France's current state
under him then you cannot be reasoned with. And your paranoia about
the "evil media" is laughable because you seem to always be under an
irrational notion that nobody can form a judgement independent of it.
Alkamista
I think Cantona summed it up nicely today by calling him "the worst
coach in French football since Louis XVI".
Bob
> On Nov 21, 7:21 am, "Bob" <B...@Bob.com> wrote:
>> Alkamista wrote:
>>> Actually, you have defended him against just about anyhting. Why
>>> dont you just come out of the closet and admit that you are a huge
>>> fan of the man?
>>
>> I have mostly said that much of the criticism against him isn't
>> compelling.
>
> What is not compelling about France's utterly shit form?
We have already talked about this and you know I don't believe France is
playing well.
>>>> it'll only be the 3rd time (or something like that) that I have to
>>>> remind you that I have been for his replacement whenever somebody
>>>> adequate is available for quite a while now. Are you willfully
>>>> lying?
>>
>>> Yes of course you have. The only problem is, no one seems to be
>>> quite better than him in your eyes, no matter how much France
>>> continues to decline under him.
>>
>> You are confusing 'available' within the context (they probably
>> would only hire a french coach) with 'better than him'. Replacing
>> him Liverpool's discards or even someone who'd provide marginal
>> improvment are highly debatable moves. But I have told you this
>> several times already, so why are you asking again?
>
> I'm not asking you anything. If you can't see France's current state
> under him then you cannot be reasoned with. And your paranoia about
> the "evil media" is laughable because you seem to always be under an
> irrational notion that nobody can form a judgement independent of it.
it's hard to tell when almost all the criticsm you read is about media
gossip and the rest isn't really *compelling* (selections, tactical choices,
..)