On 2024-02-08, Lléo <
llb....@gmail.com> wrote:
> League A
>
> Group 1: Croatia, Portugal, Poland, Scotland
A weak group.
> Group 2: Italy, Belgium, France, Israel
Israel games in Belgium and France are going to be security
nigthmares.
> Group 3: Netherlands, Hungary, Germany, Bosnia
Great draw for NL.
> Group 4: Spain, Denmark, Switzerland, Serbia
Spain should walk this.
> League B
>
> Group 1: Czech Republic, Ukraine, Albania, Georgia
> Group 2: England, Finland, Ireland, Greece
> Group 3: Austria, Norway, Slovenia, Kazakhstan
> Group 4: Wales, Iceland, Montenegro, Turkey
Could Wales and Finland switch?
> League C
>
> Group 1: Sweden, Azerbaijan, Slovakia, Estonia
League C, bwahaha.
> Group 2: Romania, Kosovo, Cyprus, Lithuania/Gibraltar
> Group 3: Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Northern Ireland, Belarus
> Group 4: Armenia, Faroe Islands, North Macedonia, Latvia
>
> League D
>
> Group 1: Lithuania/Gibraltar, San Marino, Liechtenstein
> Group 2: Moldova, Malta, Andorra
>
> A couple of format changes: now two teams advance from each of League
> A's groups to a quarterfinal round, played home and away. But from then
> on it's business as usual, one of the semifinalists hosting the semis,
> third place playoff and final.
>
> They'll also include promotion/relegation playoffs, with each 3rd placed
> team of the upper league facing a 2nd placed team from the lower one.
> For groups C and D, worst two Group C 4th placed teams go down
> automatically, while the other two 4th placed teams face two League D
> runner ups.
>
> Interesting change. As such, almost every group stage position leads
> either to some sort of playoff or to a prize/punishment. Exceptions
> being 3rd place in Leagues C and D. This could, in theory, lead to some
> exciting Round 6 scenarios.
Thanks for this summary. I had not been following these changes.
> Also nice to see they scrapped the idea of adding Conmebol sides to this
> tournament, due to Conmebol's 18-round long WCQ stage. Conmebol is too
> small to create its own Nations League, so they should either try to
> work together with Concacaf on that front, or simply not do it altogether.
>
> I don't think it would work out well anyway: on one hand, with Russia's
> suspension, it would yield a nice 64-team tournament, four divisions of
> 16; but on the other, it would either require massive travel for
> everyone involved, or making Conmebol teams hold their games in Europe.
> Probably fine for Brasil and Argentina, but not necessarily so for the
> others.
Adding Brasil and Argentina was all that was about anyway.