Scott Hendrickson
'97 ZR 580 EFI
'98 MXZ 670
Yeah, Its gonna wake upp. My dealer also told me that the 670 engine is
a little stiff in the beginning. My buddy has the same experiance on his
-97 Lynx 670.
Also make a "SLICK 50" treatment after about 500-600km. It works great.
/Fredrik Schultz Sweden
'98 Formula 670
'98 MXZ 500
'96 Formula 583
'95 Formula SL
I think you should both" wake up".Its not going to magicly get more power once
its broken in.I rode a 97 MXZ,I thought it was a pooch,even compared to my 93
Mach.Slick 50 is a scam.
You said that you had the 1.45" lug track on your MXZ, right? What track does
your friends ZR 600 have? It takes a little more power to turn that deep lug
track. With that deep lug track you are going to lose a little in the top end
anyways, but I think you made the right choice buying that 670. You just need
to give it a good break in and ride it a little more to appreciate it.
Maybe the weather on that particular day was in favor for the 600 EFI.
Remember Ski-Doo jets their sleds a little different from everyone else.
Don
Michigan
97' MXZ 440
My brother bought a new MXZ670 last year. His was slow at first but by
mid season it really woke up and was beating a lot of bigger sleds. Even
though I'm not a Skidoo man I was very impressed with his sled.
Rich
98 SRX700
88 INdy 650 (piped & ported)
86 Phazer (piped)
Greg
Another thing with the 670..my last 2 took a GOOD HARD 3-400 miles
before they really went good. wouldnt outrun a 583 till then..why..???
But we have 2 efi 600's in gang and they run right with the 583...which
has been the rocket in its class.....BUT the 670's are a good dozen
lengths out and pulling 10+ mph more in a quarter mile..The 700xc and
the 670 seem to run about the same..and thats outa my 600's range..
GEt the miles on it...then blame some on the track..
Nitro
I don't know about the wake up think but I can see it happening... But
one another point the extra height on the track paddles should slow down
your sled... One may not think of this but you DO get more air
resistance when the track is moving through the top part of the
tunnel... Also I notice on my sled compared to a sled with the same
gearing and engine I lost top end because the track was STICKING into
the snow and throwing chunks out the back as where the other sled ran
witha light mist... Also Switching to the medium windshield (from a
smaller one) would cause a slow down in top end but should have little
to no effect out of the hole..
But I could be wrong.. :)
Here we go again ..... Mod against stock.
Dan
William Hendrickson <wjhe...@up.net> wrote in article
<66t9q3$h...@btc3.up.net>...
Gary Zimmermann <ga...@ibm.net> wrote in article <3496F9...@ibm.net>...
Well Scott, I've seen the same thing here in Utah. My
buddy's modified Summit 670 can't hang with my ZR600EFI on the packed
trails in a straight ahead drag. I wouldn' have believed it if I
hadn't seen it myself.
Scott
Scott Willis Utah
2 each '96 ZRT600 Mountain Cats
'98 ZR600EFI Limited Edition
'97 Kitty Cat
http://www.vii.com/~scott
Gary Zimmermann <ga...@ibm.net> wrote in article <34994E...@ibm.net>...
> > Well Scott, I've seen the same thing here in Utah. My
> > buddy's modified Summit 670 can't hang with my ZR600EFI on the packed
> > trails in a straight ahead drag. I wouldn' have believed it if I
> > hadn't seen it myself.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Scott Willis Utah
> > 2 each '96 ZRT600 Mountain Cats
> > '98 ZR600EFI Limited Edition
> > '97 Kitty Cat
> > http://www.vii.com/~scott
> Hi Scott,
> I would say there is something seriously wrong with that Summit. If he
> hasn't yet changed the clutching for low altitudes, he is missing a
> bunch of performance. ( I'm assuming the trails you talk about are below
> 5000') My buddy rides a 700 RMK, which will leave for dead most stock
> sleds in a drage race. It is no faster than my stock 670 Summit when we
> switch. I'm 6'1", 200lbs, he is 5'7", 155lb. I find it hard to believe
> that as quick as the zr is, it will beat a 700 RMK in a straight line
> drag race. Maybe I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
> Gary Zimmermann
>
In case you guys missed this Scott is still running a 121" track...I assume
he was over 5000' being in Utah. Your RMK/Summit example pits two long
tracks.
Michael
>Hi Scott,
>I would say there is something seriously wrong with that Summit. If he
>hasn't yet changed the clutching for low altitudes, he is missing a
>bunch of performance. ( I'm assuming the trails you talk about are below
>5000')
Assumed wrong. Above 6000 ft. actually. And his sled will
actually hang with me for the most part off the line, well OK, it's a
dead heat up to about 50 mph, then it's no comparison..... I then walk
away from him like crazy, but that's because of the difference in our
tracks, I did forget to mention that I guess.... so you are right
Gary.
:)
Scott
One other thing to check out is to make sure your 670 is not over
reving. If it is you could be losing alot of power........Checkout you
max rpm and adjust your clickers to bring down to where it should
be..Most Doo's are setup a little on the high side from the factory...
good luck,
Bob