Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Perfect Lutz

2 views
Skip to first unread message

SBachmai

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to

Lots of discussion lately about (f)lutzes and how many skaters don't really
have a good lutz.

Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?


Boldness has genius and magic in it. -- Goethe

WIsil

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to
>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?

Paul Wylie and Nancy Kerrigan had just about as perfect as you can get lutzes.
Major kudos to their coaches!!!!!


Wendy
"Pick a little, talk a little, pick a little, talk a little, cheep cheep cheep,
talk a lot, pick a little more!"

The ladies of River City

Dave Amorde

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to

WIsil wrote in message <19990104164149...@ng-ca1.aol.com>...

>>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?
>
>Paul Wylie and Nancy Kerrigan had just about as perfect as you can get
lutzes.
>Major kudos to their coaches!!!!!
>

Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As
for the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable lutz
from connecting moves.

-Dave-


Skatephile

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to
>Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
>"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As
>for the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable lutz
>from connecting moves.
>
>-Dave-

Michael Weiss does decent footwork into his 3lutz as required element in his
short program this season.

--Sylvia
Skate...@aol.com


Brain 235

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to
>Major kudos to their coaches!!!!!

Yes indeed, to the Scotvolds (they had the same coach)

Steven Kan

unread,
Jan 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/4/99
to
WIsil wrote:
>
> >Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?
>
> Paul Wylie and Nancy Kerrigan had just about as perfect as you can get lutzes.

I don't know if it made it into the televised version, but Paul did
indeed have a picture perfect lutz in last year's Brian Boitano's
Holiday Skating Spectacular (love that name).

The approach was carved (sorry, I don't know the technical term, so I'm
borrowing snowboarding/skiing terminology here), so there could be no
doubt about the outside edge. And it was quick, too. None of the that
ten-second-length-of-ice-glide-hunch-over-drag-toe-pick-grit-teeth
approach we see so often.
--
A rich man who hailed from Seattle #```````
Wrote Win95 to do battle, # ```````
But Mac users pity # ```````
The masses not witty # ```````
Enough to know Wintel's for cattle. #. ```````
~ ~ . \_@_/ ```````
^_@ o . V ```````
Steven "Rocket Man" Kan `-' - \_@_ ~ . ######
mailto:ste...@kan.org V \ ~ . ######
http://www.kan.org ~ . #H2O##
Everybody S.H.I.N.E. ~ .#POLO#
Support Heterogeneity In Networked Environments ~ ~ ######

Revjoelle

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to

In article <19990104161300...@ng-fr1.aol.com>, sbac...@aol.com
(SBachmai) writes:

>Lots of discussion lately about (f)lutzes and how many skaters don't really
>have a good lutz.

Scott Hamilton--good deep outside edge--gets very high--as high as taller
skaters and he's done rotating long before he's on his way down--nice smooth
landings.

Joelle
"Whoever you like is the best skater in the world."
Scott Hamilton
Please Don't Respond to Trolls

Lorrie Kim

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
Alexei Urmanov's. It soars.

Lorrie Kim
lor...@plover.com


Fab4Fan99

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
>Lots of discussion lately about (f)lutzes and how many skaters don't really
>have a good lutz.
>
>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?

Besides the aformentioned Kerrigan and Wylie, I like Michael Weiss's. When
she's healthy, Tanja Szewczenko has a strong lutz--not only is it not flutzed,
it's *huge*.

Frank


KA1WZH GO RED SOX!!!
"Mark's the man in America. I'm the man in the Dominican Republic!"--Sammy Sosa
"That play NEVER works."--Boomer Esiason
"I'd love to turn you on"--Lennon/McCartney

NNRathbun

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
Dave Amorde writes:
>
>Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As for
the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable lutz from
connecting moves.
******
Well, Boitano had a fairly reliable 3 lutz for a coupla years there with a
spread eagle entrance. :-) (True, I am definutely not a judge of whether his
lutz is correct technically).

Nancy
>
>
>
>

Revjoelle

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to

In article <OWyqPyCO#GA.218@upnetnews05>, "Dave Amorde"
<dave....@startelcorp.com> writes:

>Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
>"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As
>for the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable lutz
>from connecting moves

Todd Eldredge often does a triple lutz from footwork. And I do believe you can
consider a spread eagle a connecting move and that would include "you know who"

Sandra Loosemore

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
fab4...@aol.com (Fab4Fan99) writes:

> When she's healthy, Tanja Szewczenko has a strong lutz--not only is
> it not flutzed, it's *huge*.

But Tanja has such scary picking technique on her lutz! She doesn't
reach back far enough. At Worlds last year it was evident that she
was having major problems with her technique on this jump.

BTW, my $0.02 worth on "who has the best lutz" is Paul Wylie, without
a doubt. I think he will long be remembered as the textbook example
of proper technique for that jump. Among current competitors,
probably Evgeny Pliuta and Angela Nikodinov have the best lutzes in
the business.

-Sandra

HILL JANET SWAN

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
SBachmai <sbac...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>Lots of discussion lately about (f)lutzes and how many skaters don't really
>have a good lutz.
>
>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?


Paul Wylie, Nancy Kerrigan, Dorothy Hamill, Irina Slutskaya, Brian Orser,
Brian Boitano, Todd Eldredge

janet
--

HILL JANET SWAN

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
Dave Amorde <dave....@startelcorp.com> wrote:
>

>WIsil wrote in message <19990104164149...@ng-ca1.aol.com>...

>>>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?
>>

>>Paul Wylie and Nancy Kerrigan had just about as perfect as you can get

>lutzes. Major kudos to their coaches!!!!!


>
>Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
>"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As
>for the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable lutz

>from connecting moves.

Well, I think you could still include these two. Specifically Kerrigan,
whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
sequences.

janet

--

Ann Lewis

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
HILL JANET SWAN wrote:

> Specifically Kerrigan,
> whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
> sequences.

Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better than her horsey teeth. :-)

AJL

rnar...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
In article <m3vhily...@localhost.localdomain>,

Angela? Really? It does seem to be a solid jump for her, but I was under
the impression that she sometimes flutzes a tiny bit (like Michelle Kwan used
to). Then again, I have only seen her skate on tv, and not since Skate
America, so I could be completely mistaken.

Ronald
--
Ronald Narciso ============================== rnar...@my-dejanews.com
Skating page ======== http://members.tripod.com/~rnarciso/skating.html

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

WIsil

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
>> Specifically Kerrigan,
>> whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
>> sequences.
>
>Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better than her horsey teeth. :-)
>
>AJL

Back to your old self, Ann? What ever happened to refraining from ridicule
and name calling, or was that just more of your bull?


Wendy

Little T

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
Boy oh boy, it sure didn't take long for Ann to get back to her usual
self did it? Sad too, as I was finally considering her a viable
member of this NG!

Toni

On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 11:03:41 -0500, Ann Lewis <ajl...@erols.com>
wrote:

Ann Lewis

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
WIsil wrote:

> Back to your old self, Ann? What ever happened to refraining from ridicule
> and name calling, or was that just more of your bull?

Well, since you have called me a "bitch" within this newsgroup, you're
hardly one who can point fingers. I didn't engage in any name-calling
in this instance. I merely pointed out that Nancy Kerrigan's lutz is
superior to the hideous cap job she had done on her teeth. :-)

AJL

Isiafs5

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
>Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better ....

I did not find the comment funny. Sad really.


BG ( soft knees wantabe)

actual isia 4.9 but I rounded up

Dave Amorde

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to

HILL JANET SWAN wrote in message <76tcnf$j...@peabody.colorado.edu>...

>Dave Amorde <dave....@startelcorp.com> wrote:
>>
>
>>WIsil wrote in message <19990104164149...@ng-ca1.aol.com>...
>>>>Who has (or had) a really great lutz? Or even a satisfactory one?
>>>
>>>Paul Wylie and Nancy Kerrigan had just about as perfect as you can get
>>lutzes. Major kudos to their coaches!!!!!
>>
>>Perhaps I could add to the question by giving an additional condition:
>>"...entered from connecting moves." Kinda limits the field, doesn't it? As
>>for the answer, I'd say I don't know of a skater with a truly reliable
lutz
>>from connecting moves.
>
>Well, I think you could still include these two. Specifically Kerrigan,

>whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
>sequences.
>

I had forgotten about Nancy. Her lutz was always one of the highlights of
what (IMO, ofcourse!) were usually boring programs!

-Dave-


jeste...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
In article <369237...@erols.com>,

Ann Lewis <ajl...@erols.com> wrote:
> HILL JANET SWAN wrote:
>
> > Specifically Kerrigan,
> > whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
> > sequences.
>
> Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better than her horsey teeth. :-)
>
> AJL
>

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! That was pretty good!! I think we all have to agree your
the winner on this one Annie. You beat everyone you are the Perfect....oh,
sorry, I thought that said the Perfect PUTZ. My fault. You woulda won in my
book though.

jester

Virginia Blalock

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999 09:41:51 -0800, "Dave Amorde"
<dave....@startelcorp.com> wrote:


>>Well, I think you could still include these two. Specifically Kerrigan,


>>whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
>>sequences.
>>
>

>I had forgotten about Nancy. Her lutz was always one of the highlights of
>what (IMO, ofcourse!) were usually boring programs!

I liked the delay before rotating she did when she really hit one
well. Lovely!

Virginia
Visit The Skating Rink
http://visions.simplenet.com/skate/index.html

Fred H. Williams

unread,
Jan 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/5/99
to

WIsil wrote in message <19990105114042...@ng96.aol.com>...

>>> Specifically Kerrigan,
>>> whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
>>> sequences.
>>
>>Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better than her horsey teeth. :-)
>>
>>AJL
>
>Back to your old self, Ann? What ever happened to refraining from
ridicule
>and name calling, or was that just more of your bull?
>
Right!
Nancy has no problems in the looks dept. Believe me, I'm a connoisseur
of feminine beauty.(;-)) Besides, I don't think there's a mandatory
deduction for "horsey teeth" even if she did have them.

--
"Since wars are made in the minds of men, it is in the
minds of men that the defenses of peace must be created."
- from the Preamble to the Charter of UNESCO

Peace, Siblings,
Fred Williams,
remove NOSPAM to reply
harry...@citenet.net

Debby M. Fortin

unread,
Jan 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/7/99
to
In article <76s1tv$cm0$1...@picasso.op.net>,
lor...@plover.com (Lorrie Kim) wrote:

> Alexei Urmanov's. It soars.

I agree!! He has a great curved edge into it, almost like an arc on a figure circle and the same
type of arc out of it. It's high and has the best air position. Now Alexsei, my dear, just get
it away from the boards in your new long program so you can show us that great exit arc!!!


Cheers,

Debby

Salch0w

unread,
Jan 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/8/99
to
>Well, I think you could still include these two. Specifically Kerrigan,

>whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite nifty
>sequences.
>
> janet

My favorite was her double Lutz from a back shoot-the-duck. And in her 92
short program she did the Lutz with hands behind her head. From so low to so
high was very very cool.

Tim

DesertRoaz

unread,
Jan 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/8/99
to
Salchow said:

>
>My favorite was her double Lutz from a back shoot-the-duck. And in her 92
>short program she did the Lutz with hands behind her head. From so low to so
>high was very very cool.
>

Wait a sec...I thought in her '92 short she did her double jump with her hands
behind her head. Was it a double lutz? And if so, what was her triple?


DesertRoaz -- delete "cutie" to reply

www.expage.com/page/desertroaz (my movie-buff website)


Dave Amorde

unread,
Jan 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/8/99
to

DesertRoaz wrote in message <19990108021542...@ng142.aol.com>...

>Salchow said:
>
>>
>>My favorite was her double Lutz from a back shoot-the-duck. And in her 92
>>short program she did the Lutz with hands behind her head. From so low to
so
>>high was very very cool.
>>
>
>Wait a sec...I thought in her '92 short she did her double jump with her
hands
>behind her head. Was it a double lutz? And if so, what was her triple?
>

By the "shoot the duck" reference, I'm concluding that you're both referring
to Kerrigan, but correct me if I'm wrong; something about a lack of
threading in the newsreader....;-)

-Dave-


DesertRoaz

unread,
Jan 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/9/99
to
Dave said

>
>By the "shoot the duck" reference, I'm concluding that you're both referring
>to Kerrigan, but correct me if I'm wrong; something about a lack of
>threading in the newsreader....;-)

Yes, Kerrigan. :-)

Jm Comes

unread,
Jan 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/9/99
to

Ann Lewis <ajl...@erols.com> wrote in article <369237...@erols.com>...


> HILL JANET SWAN wrote:
>
> > Specifically Kerrigan,
> > whose lutz following alternating back lunges is one of my favorite
nifty
> > sequences.
>

> Yes. Her lutz certainly looks a lot better than her horsey teeth. :-)
>
> AJL


I'm sure you look like a supermodel Ann! You must have really low self
esteem about yourself to do this and waste our time! And nobody reply and
say I am "feeding the troll"!!!!!

Liz

Salch0w

unread,
Jan 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/10/99
to
DesertRoaz:
>Me:

>>My favorite was her double Lutz from a back shoot-the-duck. And in her 92
>>short program she did the Lutz with hands behind her head. From so low to
>so
>>high was very very cool.
>
>Wait a sec...I thought in her '92 short she did her double jump with her
>hands
>behind her head. Was it a double lutz? And if so, what was her triple?

Yes, Nancy did the double Lutz with hands behind the head out of a shoot the
duck. Her triple Lutz was her combo with a double toe, and it was a huge
triple Lutz. (I thought she should've won that short program, but that's just
me thinking she was ripped off again.)

Tim


JoMe234

unread,
Jan 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/10/99
to
Yes, Nancy did the double Lutz with hands behind the head out of a shoot the
duck. Her triple Lutz was her combo with a double toe, and it was a huge
triple Lutz. (I thought she should've won that short program, but that's just
me thinking she was ripped off again.)

Tim
>>

No Tim, I agree with you on that.


Bill
:p

erik...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Jan 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/11/99
to
In article <19990109223841...@ng61.aol.com>,

But guys, you HAVE to remember that half the mark is on presentation, and
Kristi's program was MUCH stronger as a program. Kristi's spins are always
better (layback, camel, etc.). And Nancy did NOT do that 2lutz out of
footwork, so she should have had a deduction.

IMO, that SP was not even close.

*cringing at the thought of that CHEESEBALL music Nancy skated to*

Erik

Sandra Loosemore

unread,
Jan 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/11/99
to
erik...@my-dejanews.com writes:

> And Nancy did NOT do that 2lutz out of
> footwork, so she should have had a deduction.

Repeat after me: The rules were different then.

Back in 1992, it was considered permissible for skaters to use a
free-skating element such as a spread eagle, back spiral, etc as the
entry to their solo jump, instead of footwork. Nancy's back
shoot-the-duck was in the same category. I don't think it was until
the 1994-95 season that the rules were changed to clarify that a single
connecting element of this type was not adequate and that the skaters
had to do multiple elements or steps.

-Sandra

DesertRoaz

unread,
Jan 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/11/99
to
Sandra said:

>
>Back in 1992, it was considered permissible for skaters to use a
>free-skating element such as a spread eagle, back spiral, etc as the
>entry to their solo jump, instead of footwork. Nancy's back
>shoot-the-duck was in the same category. I don't think it was until
>the 1994-95 season that the rules were changed to clarify that a single
>connecting element of this type was not adequate and that the skaters
>had to do multiple elements or steps.
>
>-Sandra
>

Was it permissable then for the double jump to be the same kind of jump as the
triple? (I assume so, since Nancy received a high placement.)

skat...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/11/99
to
Erik says about Nancy Kerrigan's SP in 1992 at the Olympics:

>
> But guys, you HAVE to remember that half the mark is on presentation, and
> Kristi's program was MUCH stronger as a program. Kristi's spins are always
> better (layback, camel, etc.). And Nancy did NOT do that 2lutz out of

> footwork, so she should have had a deduction.


The double jump in the SP (like the triple jump today)had to be done out of
footwork OR some other skating move (spiral, ina bauer, shoot the duck, etc.),
so Nancy's program was legal and did NOT require a deduction.
Jean Lenzi

Trudi Marrapodi

unread,
Jan 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/11/99
to
In article <m3r9t2v...@localhost.localdomain>, Sandra Loosemore
<san...@shore.net> wrote:

> erik...@my-dejanews.com writes:
>
> > And Nancy did NOT do that 2lutz out of
> > footwork, so she should have had a deduction.
>

> Repeat after me: The rules were different then.
>

> Back in 1992, it was considered permissible for skaters to use a
> free-skating element such as a spread eagle, back spiral, etc as the
> entry to their solo jump, instead of footwork. Nancy's back
> shoot-the-duck was in the same category. I don't think it was until
> the 1994-95 season that the rules were changed to clarify that a single
> connecting element of this type was not adequate and that the skaters
> had to do multiple elements or steps.

It might have been as early as 1993-94. I seem to recall some question
that season as to whether Brian Boitano's spreadeagle entry to the Tano
lutz qualified as "multiple elements or steps."

Trudi

"I'm looking forward to a happy life with no stress"-Yevgeny Platov

0 new messages