Working here.
Kaplan.
He'll send off so many that the stadium will be empty.
And he's off: England move toward scoring, penalty.
Obstruction on kick chaser, some things never change.....
And again. C'mon England, get ripped into these fucking clowns.
Forward pass from Nonu, play on......
Currently NZ can hold the tackled player twice as long as we can, try
counting it.
Doing well against 16 men.
I thought I spotted a backward pass by the AB's at one point.... must have
been seeing things.
Didgie,
Thanks for posting that link- Setanta as usual have been pricks.
Unbiased view as a Kiwi : )
Both packs equal. Liked the England #8, showed up Read big time.
Thought you could have done with Courtney coming on after 40 minutes.
New Zealand backs better organized and more incisive on the counter
attack. The dual between Carter and Wilkinson didn't happen, both had
shockers.
Ref was rubbish- but kept the game going by not yellow carding (I hate
players being carded).
Cheers, Tim
Moody man of the match, outstanding. Banahan shown up for hopefully
the last time in an England jersey at 11. What are you seeing, John
Hill, that the rest of the world doesn't?
England punched above their weight for the first time in a while but
still not good enough. They had the crowd and passion, but little
else. NZ were decidedly average for them.
Summary: England played out of their skins for them and lost. New
Zealand played a very average game for them and won.
Says it all, really.
Two Dogs
Moody man of the match, outstanding. Banahan shown up for hopefully
the last time in an England jersey at 11. What are you seeing, John
Hill, that the rest of the world doesn't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Moody was good at what he does but not enough on the ground work like
McCaw - I thought Haskell was the outstanding player for England. And Erinle
was a waste of space - if they had Gerachty there from the start the
enterprise that England looked to be keen on displaying could have made it
past Wilkinson. Cueto had a very good game at the back as well I thought.
Cheers, aMtt
>
> Unbiased view as a Kiwi : )
>
> Both packs equal. Liked the England #8, showed up Read big time.
> Thought you could have done with Courtney coming on after 40 minutes.
>
> New Zealand backs better organized and more incisive on the counter
> attack. The dual between Carter and Wilkinson didn't happen, both had
> shockers.
I thought Carter had a pretty good 2nd half, especially his defensive
game. Both he and Wilkinson are great on defence but I think Carter's
technique is just that little bit better and stops him getting broken in
the way that Wilco has. Was never going to be easy on attack, they are
both excellent defensive sides and the conditions weren't flash
It seems to me that Mils has just lost a yard of pace this year. His
returns aren't as sharp and he usually kicks rather than trying to reset
the attack, and a few years back I reckon he'd have been over the try
line before Monye could drag him out. Such is life though.
Can't understand why Croft wasn't playing from the start, he's looked
good every game I've seen him play for England and the Lions. Also
thought Gerachty looked good when he came on. The bloke he replaced had
done nothing.
>
> Ref was rubbish- but kept the game going by not yellow carding (I hate
> players being carded).
>
He was alright I thought. After watching Dickinson the week before, any
ref is going to look capable in comparison.
--
Cheers, Os
If he didn't send off that English prop for that double punch in the
ruck (which he penalised him for), then I don't know.
"didgerman" <didg...@rfu.com> wrote in message
news:he92m6$iak$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Are you not at all embarrassed by this one-eyed monologue? I would be.
Andrew
lol that's a good euphemism for it Andy - "one eyed monlogue"
First Banahan, like most of the England backs is performing a lot less
well here than with their clubs.
Second the England selectors, obviously see something in Banahan -
although I would rather have seen Sackey in the 14 jersey rather than
Banahan on the right wing where he has never played before.
By Klitty's criteria Banahan is an outstanding wing - since he scored
a try last week.
England did not punch above their weight, for most of the players they
simply played the game they do with their clubs, many very much less
well than they do with their clubs.
Summary England have some good players poorly used.
JH
Where did you get that nonsense from John? Making things up to support
your drunken tirades against anyone that doesn't see it your way?
No, scoring a try does NOT make you great.
Scoring a try with a great run, great evasiveness etc etc contributes
when you do it time and time again. Your dislike for Williams is
legendary. Let it go. He is far and away a quicker pick that Monye or
your other little golden boy Sackey (who is no where international level
IMO btw).
BTW, I am not knocking Banahan too quickly either. Lets leave the fan
boy reaction mode critiques to you.
> England did not punch above their weight, for most of the players they
> simply played the game they do with their clubs, many very much less
> well than they do with their clubs.
>
> Summary England have some good players poorly used.
>
> JH
Summary : you reinforce your previous comments about only blaming the
England set up.
Sorry, i thought that was your view. If you score a try by hanging off
someone's shoulder you are brilliant. So are you telling us now that
isn't so ?
> No, scoring a try does NOT make you great.
>
> Scoring a try with a great run, great evasiveness etc etc contributes
> when you do it time and time again. Your dislike for Williams is
> legendary. Let it go. He is far and away a quicker pick that Monye or
> your other little golden boy Sackey (who is no where international level
> IMO btw).
>
My is the elevation to godlike status by Williams fan boysand is based
on performance, nothing as personal as dislike.
In fact he seems like a nice enough chap and is good when on form.
> BTW, I am not knocking Banahan too quickly either. Lets leave the fan
> boy reaction mode critiques to you.
>
> > England did not punch above their weight, for most of the players they
> > simply played the game they do with their clubs, many very much less
> > well than they do with their clubs.
>
> > Summary England have some good players poorly used.
>
> > JH
>
> Summary : you reinforce your previous comments about only blaming the
> England set up.
Why would I not do that, they are pretty glaring to anyone with an
understanding of the game and the history of the people involved, and
based on performance.
JH
Certainly agree with second, haven't looked back at first point yet....
Kaplan is always terrible, and never favours England for the majority of
the game. Often he is downright biased against us, one particular
Ireland game has earned him the name O'Kaplan from me, I'm sure he's
gutted.....
I was waiting for a rugby fan to jump in with some comment, but now
you're here.....
> Andrew
Maxx, don't do jokes ok. You're just not equipped.
lol