Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

SA v Leicester

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Doyle

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 11:00:31 PM11/6/09
to
Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
Maybe there should be more games like it?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-africa

Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?

Cheers
Stephen


Uncle Dave

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:31:00 AM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 4:00 am, "Stephen Doyle" <st...@dmsystems.co.nz> wrote:
> Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
> Maybe there should be more games like it?
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-af...

>
> Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?

So what was the point of that then? It's not as if the RSRU Shield
was up for grabs...

UD

DC

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 3:51:28 AM11/7/09
to

So Munster's 1978 victory over NZ was meaningless?

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:00:38 AM11/7/09
to

Leicester Tigers are a club side, they can field players from wherever
they like. Even Nottingham.
What you're talking about is happening today: England {a country} play
Australia {another country}. Just to be clear, the entire England
starting 15 were born inside UK territorial waters {Actually all born in
England except a winger who was born on an island near England}.
Do you see how this works? Welcome to rugby.

>
> Cheers
> Stephen
>
>

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:12:41 AM11/7/09
to
Uncle Dave wrote:
> On Nov 7, 4:00 am, "Stephen Doyle" <st...@dmsystems.co.nz> wrote:
>> Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
>> Maybe there should be more games like it?
>>
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-af...
>>
>> Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?
>
> So what was the point of that then?

Read the Tigers' fan forum.

It's not as if the RSRU Shield
> was up for grabs...

Sometimes it's not about the baubles.

>
> UD

lord shineything

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:14:27 AM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 10:00 pm, didgerman <didger...@rfu.com> wrote:
> Stephen Doyle wrote:
> > Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
> > Maybe there should be more games like it?
>
> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-af...

>
> > Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?
>
> Leicester Tigers are a club side, they can field players from wherever
> they like. Even Nottingham.
> What you're talking about is happening today: England {a country} play
> Australia {another country}. Just to be clear, the entire England
> starting 15 were born inside UK territorial waters {Actually all born in
> England except a winger who was born on an island near England}.
> Do you see how this works? Welcome to rugby.
>
Lord Shiney assumes Flutey is not playing then?

Stephen Doyle

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:18:35 AM11/7/09
to

"didgerman" <didg...@rfu.com> wrote in message
news:hd3cvq$jmj$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
------------------
And the answer to the original question is...?

Cheers
Stephen


didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:26:31 AM11/7/09
to

Irrelevant.

>
> Cheers
> Stephen
>
>

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 4:29:06 AM11/7/09
to

It's a rare thing, but Lord Shiney assumes correctly.
Flutey left New Zealand to get away from people like you and inferior SH
rugby.

Uncle Dave

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 5:10:52 AM11/7/09
to

I'm guessing that in those days it would have been full sides rather
than cobbled together ones and there was some mystery to tours as we
simply didn't get to see every sodding game in every sodding country
twice a frigging day. I really don't care other than that people seem
to be more and more just accepting the "quantity over quality"
approach taken by unions in recent years. Enjoy! There'll be another
one along in a minute so you won't get withdrawal symptoms.

UD

Simon S-B

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 6:25:42 AM11/7/09
to

"Stephen Doyle" <st...@dmsystems.co.nz> wrote in message
news:hd2rcu$j8l$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Twice as many as would have had England not been playing today. That's the
whole point of the imports.

Tim Jesson

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 7:51:47 AM11/7/09
to

Non England

Scott Hamilton (NZ, import 2008)
Lucas Armorisino (Arg, import Sept 2009)
Johne Murphy (Ire, Leicester Academy)
Manu Tuilagi (PI, Leicester Academy)
Mauger (NZ, import 2007 after the RWC)
M Davies (Wales, import 2007)
Castrogiovanni (Italy, import 2006)
Stankovic (Ukraine, import 2008)
Tuqiri (Aus, import this week)

Good question Stephen.

TJ

Mr.Will

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 8:58:00 AM11/7/09
to

"Tim Jesson" <t...@somewherebutnothere.net> wrote in message
news:ur6dnRu5S9j-8GjX...@brightview.co.uk...

Why stop there, how many are from LEICESTER?

Mr.Will


Two Dogs

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 9:29:10 AM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 4:00 am, didgerman <didger...@rfu.com> wrote:
> Stephen Doyle wrote:
> > Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
> > Maybe there should be more games like it?
>
> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-af...

>
> > Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?
>
> Leicester Tigers are a club side, they can field players from wherever
> they like. Even Nottingham.
> What you're talking about is happening today: England {a country} play
> Australia {another country}. Just to be clear, the entire England
> starting 15 were born inside UK territorial waters {Actually all born in
> England except a winger who was born on an island near England}.
> Do you see how this works? Welcome to rugby.

You've been waiting 10 years to be able to say that....

TwoDogs

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 10:03:14 AM11/7/09
to

Interestingly, no other country can say that, not in the top ten anyway.

Two Dogs

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 10:10:38 AM11/7/09
to

New Zealand can

Two Dogs

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 10:26:06 AM11/7/09
to

Yeah sure. Shall I check or shall we just assume you're being a naughty
boy? Yes, let's.....

>
> Two Dogs

Two Dogs

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 10:54:00 AM11/7/09
to

What are the parameters you had for england? Born in England or on
an Island nearby?


TD

didgerman

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:00:26 AM11/7/09
to

Nearby, Samoa isn't 'near' New Zealand.

>
>
> TD

Two Dogs

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:05:57 AM11/7/09
to

You are thinking with a European mindset. Everything is in a so much
smaller scale over there.

The southern Pacific Islands are all near New Zealand

TD

Brent Hadley

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:51:28 AM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 12:51 pm, Tim Jesson <t...@somewherebutnothere.net> wrote:

> Stankovic (Ukraine, import 2008)

Interesting way of spelling 'New Zealand'.

Cheers

Brent

Myk Cameron

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 2:37:08 PM11/7/09
to
"didgerman" <didg...@rfu.com> wrote in message
news:hd3el5$rbs$2...@news.eternal-september.org...


The jokes on him then.

Myk

Stephen Doyle

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 3:31:34 PM11/7/09
to

"Tim Jesson" <t...@somewherebutnothere.net> wrote in message
news:ur6dnRu5S9j-8GjX...@brightview.co.uk...

Thank you Tim, so 2/3 not eligable to play for England. Mmmmmm.

Cheers
Stephen


Ian Jennings

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 7:26:37 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 6:25 am, "Simon S-B" <baitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Stephen Doyle" <st...@dmsystems.co.nz> wrote in message
>
> news:hd2rcu$j8l$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > Nice to see a provincial side have a win against an international team,
> > Maybe there should be more games like it?
>
> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/nov/06/leicester-tigers-south-af...

>
> > Just to stir it, how many of the Leicester team came from offshore?
>
> > Cheers
> > Stephen
>
> Twice as many as would have had England not been playing today. That's the
> whole point of the imports.

Leicester can be fucking grateful their England players weren't on the
pitch, judging by today's game.

Ian

Leonard

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 8:04:36 PM11/7/09
to
> Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You've brought up a good point.
The Professional players are not as passionate as the "amateurs" and
as hungy to win at times.
It showed in the Sharks semi in Durban two weeks ago where the Bok
front row was destroyed and once again at Leicester.

A lot of the pros have become prima donnas

didgerman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 1:15:35 PM11/8/09
to

Yeah, possibly because the ones that were eligible to play for England,
were playing for England.
You're not that bright are you.

>
> Cheers
> Stephen
>
>

Mike

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:50:12 PM11/8/09
to

Assuming Leicester had all players available and a fully fit squad then
Amorisino, Tuilagi, Davies, Stankovic and Tuquri would not have played.
Nor would they have had to invite a second row from a neighbouring
club to play.

That said the other Tuilagi might well have played had he not been as
fat as fuck.

Mike

0 new messages