Head's? It is not often I need to look out for heads floating in the water.
What kind of gruesome river do you row on anyway? 8<D No, I get your point and
it is good one. Fortunately swimmers are not common where we row (the potomac
is too dirty downstream of the 14th street bridge, or so swimmers have told
me).
I am still testing this "forward" view mirror thing. I am going to try the
following suggestion as well to fight the blind spot problem -
"If you do use it put it on the side that you don't turn. That is if you
tend to look around on the right put it on the left. That at least will
help avoid the mirror blocking your vision." (Steven Maynard-Moody).
later,
eric
Does the extra area of the potomoc rowing mirror make a significant
improvement? You imply that you use two. How much extra does that help? How
serious, for you, are the blind spot considerations that have been mentioned
by other posters?
Jim
MElsen wrote:
>
> I find the "forward" view mirror useful, particularly in avoiding floating
> objects and in checking the navigation situation. The mirror is a bit
> difficult at first, but if you use the boat's bow as reference, the view
> becomes stable with practice. After using one (two) for five years, I feel
> unsafe without it, since I row where there are many logs and the river twists
> more degrees than my old neck.
>
> Potomic rowing sells larger (than bike) mirrors mounted either on a sweatband
> or ball cap. (800-477-0440 or
> http://mem...@aol.com/potomacrow/potomac/index.htm)
>
> Hope this info helps.
> Cheers,
> Morris
Of course it did not help that I had them attached to a pair of sunglasses and a
thick fog set in shortly after getting on the water. Needless to say, I was
having trouble seeing in general with the fog. I am going to try them out
hooked to a ball cap rather than sunglasses next time. Maybe that will work out
better.
What do other people think of these, and how many use them?
eric
A3aan.
--
Mathematics & Computerscience, VU, Amsterdam
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~a3aan/Roeien/
It's amusing to see all these reasons advanced by non-users of mirrors,
explaining why mirrors can't work. I've been sculling with a bike mirror
(brand name: Third Eye) for roughly 10 years. I consider it an essential
item of my rowing equipment. It's not that my neck is stiff-- I can still
look ahead directly, but it's a lot more trouble.
What could R.P.Collings mean by "blind spot"? It's true that my small
mirror doesn't give a panoramic view of the river ahead, but that is not a
problem. By turning my head a few degrees either way I can scan
continuously for oncoming boats, bridge abutments, paddleboats, and
canoes. And the same scanning process continually refreshes my mental
picture of the river head.
Not seeing the whole view ahead at once is no more of a problem than it
is for the conventional head-turning sculler not to see the view all the
time. But it does take getting used to (I had the advantage of using the
morror first on a bike.)
Perhaps sculling mirrors will go the way of car mirrors. As I understand
it, no one used them until a mirror-equipped car won the Indianapolis 500
auto race, after which they became standard (not that everyone uses them,
either!).
--Ham
--
Hamilton Richards Jr. Department of Computer Sciences
Senior Lecturer Mail Code C0500
512-471-9525 The University of Texas at Austin
SHC 434 Austin, Texas 78712-1188
> A guy here in Amsterdam rows with mirrors on his oarlocks. No blind spot of
> course, but I wonder if I would be able to see a lot in a little mirror
mounted
> about 80 cm away. The guy always uses them so apparantly it works for him
> (although I did see him traveling very suddenly and swiftly in the other
> direction after crashing head-on with a varsity eight one time).
The problem with boat-mounted mirrors is that a rower is continuously
moving in relation to the mirror. That means that during some part of the
stroke, the mirror won't give a useful view. Of course one could get used
to that, but I prefer a mirror that is useful throughout the stroke.
> I think the key to a good mirror system, like the Potomac one, is that it be
> mounted such that it is about 15+ cm away from the eye and of reasonable size
> (5x5cm).
Because one focuses not on the mirror but on the view of the river
reflected in it, the distance (and size) of the mirror is not what really
matters. What matters is the angle subtended by the mirror. A small mirror
close to the eye can give the same view as a larger mirror further away.
Of course there are limits. If the mirror is too close, you can't see
past your own ear; if it's too far away, it's physically awkward. Both the
Potomac mirror and the (smaller) Third Eye seem to be well within the
limits.
>This morning I noted that, when looking around, the mirror on my
> ballcap created a blind spot right next to the boat....
The "blind spot" again. It's not a problem unless one is staring fixedly
(which would be rather hard to do while sculling!). Just turn your head
slightly from side to side, and there's no blind spot.
We all know how to do this, because we all come equipped with a blind
spot in each eye (where the optic nerve connects to the retina). If both
eyes are open, of course, each eye can see what's in the other eye's blind
spot, but try closing one eye. Is part of the scene invisible? No, because
you automatically shift your gaze to take in the scene piecemeal. With a
little practice, the same technique solves the same problem for sculling
mirrors.
> What could R.P.Collings mean by "blind spot"? It's true that my small
> mirror doesn't give a panoramic view of the river ahead, but that is not a
> problem.
I think the blind spot is more of a problem when you have the mirror too close
to your eye. I first tried a mirror on Tuesday of this week and I had a
considerable blind spot when turning to look around. This was because I had the
mirror attached to a pair of sunglasses and the mirror was very close to my
eye. Today, I tried using it while attached to a ballcap. This worked much
better because the mirror was not so close to my eye (at least that is my
theory). However, I still find it a bit distracting, and hard to use. I think I
will get used to it, and plan to use it for safety sake.
eric