One thing that disappoints me is the trend towards 13mm diameter pins
for scull and sweep - "'cos it's convenient".
Why? the amount of bend on a cylindrical bar under a given load is
proportional to the cube of its diameter. That makes the 9/16"
(14.28mm) pin 33% stiffer than the 13mm pin.
Obviously rowers want the most rigid possible pin alignment. And their
greatest force is applied around mid-stroke (when the magic of the
backstay/topstay has limited effect), so the trend towards 13mm pin for
sweep and scull is neither well thought out nor smart.
Similarly, the 13mm scull pin is a whole 60% stiffer than the 7/16" pin
We make very stiff riggers, we value that stiffness (which exceeds that
of the pin - especially when the rower has the oarlock near the top of
the pin - so it is disappointing to encounter pressure to switch from
9/16" to 13mm for sweep pins just because a major oarlock maker may have
dropped 9/16" bushes from their inventory (if indeed they have?).
It gets me wondering how many engineers we still have in rowing. As a
sailing friend said to me not long ago (and I paraphrase slightly), "You
rowers work so much harder than we do, but you'd go faster if only you
took the trouble to understand the engineering science behind what you do"
Cheers -
Carl
--
Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
Find:
tinyurl.com/2tqujf
Email:
ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel:
+44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
URLs:
carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com