I agree, but I think erg scores are a good predictor of the
potential of a sculler. They just need to learn to scull, Carl
said this earlier.
Had a group of scullers out a few years ago, nat'l team
candidates for heavy US and one lightweight Euro who medaled
in the single (silver).
The US men were universally 10-15 secs faster over 2k in
an erg than the sculler, in the aerobic training sessions
they competed really hard and took turns finishing ahead
of him (against my suggestions, btw). However, the best any of
these guys would do in a flat water 2k in a single would
be 7:10, where the ltwt had a solid sub-7:00.
the ltwt kept finishes deep, catches were consistent,
power application was relaxed and consistent. The US
men had good power application, but were inconsistent and
average to poor at either end of the stroke.
Power output is power output, period. But what moves the
boat (relatively) is what the blade does in the water with that power,
and what the body doesn't do to stop it.
I have two vids. One of a world champion sculler, one of a
US nat'l team sculler, both with the same exact body types
and erg scores within two seconds of each other. One vid
was sent to me (thanks), the other I took, both during
aerobic training sessions @24 -26 spm (thank you as well).
I can count good catches, good finishes, over 40-50 strokes
at a time. The US sculler rows better than most US
scullers I've seen, his best strokes are as good as
the world champion. But his worst strokes are worse
than the world champion's, and there are more of them
by 1-2 per 10 strokes I count.