On 04/01/17 17:31, Sarah Harbour wrote:
> Interesting. Hadn't heard of it (clearly wasn't paying enough attention when I skimmed through R&R!).
Nor me!
What differentiates it from C2 or WaterRower? The "wobbliness" of it,
presumably. I suppose the idea is that rowing clubs would buy them in
preference to "traditional" machines, but would they be good enough to
allow instruction/improvement in on-water technique? Possible, I
suppose, but I'm sceptical. Two handles as an aid to sculling
instruction? Well, maybe; but without arcs and a crossover it's just
too different from the real thing.
Building strength in the core muscles, probably; but it's an expensive
way to do that.
As you suggest, I can't see the indoor rowing fraternity wanting these
at all: not comparable to every other machine in every other gym, and
what benefit would they see from the wobble?
--
Henry Law n e w s @ l a w s h o u s e . o r g
Manchester, England