F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsB00EDBC6FCF3Df...@95.217.65.137:
> If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
> the terroists win.
>
>> Skeeter <
Skeet...@proton.me> wrote in
>>
news:MPG.3ed79be61...@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <
XnsB00E9DD9C270fr...@95.217.65.137>, freezer88
>>> @hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> No, he just votes for them.
>>>
>>> Where is the rest of the post you coward.
>>
>> Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
>> <VjA5M.509215$mmyc....@fx37.iad> (easily found by looking
>> at the References header in his message). That post, which
>> started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
>> decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
>>
>
> No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
> defense against having address... Anything, really.
>
> That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?