Bret's in his first year of a 20 year contract. He isn't going anywhere.
The man without a tag line,
Goofus Paludis
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he
didn't exist." ---Verbal Kint
He's either at the very end of his first year, or the very beginning of his
second year.
dabl...@rocketmail.com wrote in message <345f4...@news.glasscity.net>...
>
>Would you 2 'guys' mind if I save your posts? Then when Bret
>starts in WCW I could repost it and we can all laugh at your
>expense!
Well I've saved yours in the event Hart stays, so that we can laugh at you
instead.
Riggs
ri...@mch1.demon.co.uk
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster
himself."
Janis Johnson wrote:
>toor...@aol.com (Too ra yay) wrote:
>>>MiCasa is reporting that Bret Hart has given the WWF his notice, and will
>>>be in the WCW starting January 8th!
>>
>>Bret's in his first year of a 20 year contract. He isn't going anywhere.
>>
>Correctemundo. But isn't he in the second year of that contract now?
>
Would you 2 'guys' mind if I save your posts? Then when Bret
starts in WCW I could repost it and we can all laugh at your
expense! If you would bother to read MiCasa you would see
that Hart had an out-clause which he chose to take. You don't
think that he would just sign a contract for 20 years knowing
how much WCW would pay for him and not find some way to be
able to get out of it if the price was right or the situation in the
WWF was wrong do you? Well, obviously you do but then
again obviously you are wrong. But in all fairness, let's wait until
next weeks Nitro to see what Bischoff has to say, because if this
is a work he will debunk it just to spite McMahon!
But MiCasa is also reporting that that contract had a one-year escape clause --
and that Bret is using it...
I dunno -- if it's true, basically this would push the WWF, IMHO, to forcibly
become ECW-ish in full-scale, or die... It's pushing down that road to begin
with, but losing Hart would be a major blow...
Mike
Ehhhh, unsubstantiated answer. Who said Bret has a one-year escape
clause? Interesting that didn't come out until today.
> toor...@aol.com (Too ra yay) wrote:
> >>MiCasa is reporting that Bret Hart has given the WWF his notice, and will
> >>be in the WCW starting January 8th!
> >
> >Bret's in his first year of a 20 year contract. He isn't going anywhere.
> >
> Correctemundo. But isn't he in the second year of that contract now?
It was reported, I think in the Ryder site, that Bret has an "out" clause
at the end of the first year. He might be exercising it.
--
Jeff Amdur
Quality foreign language instruction since 1971 (Oy, gevalt! THAT long?!?)
Quality timekeeping for sports events since 1973
je...@home.com jef...@aol.com jia...@umd5.umd.edu
A contract that Bret's lawyers, not McMahon's drafted.
Think about it.
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
McMahon was in a bidding war with WCW for Hart's services. Perhaps Hart
insisted that if McMahon didn't give him an "out" clause he'd sign with WCW.
Having just lost a bunch of name wrestlers McMahon may have agreed to this
stipulation in order to keep Hart.
> Well, obviously you do but then
> >again obviously you are wrong.
>
> Obviously wrong? Has the WWF confirmed this? So far, the only thing you
> have right now is a rumor posted on some website somewhere. That is far
> from confirmation.
Rumors sometimes have more credability than words eminating from wrestling
organziations. Some other rumors making the rounds have Hall and Nash
thinking of going back to the WWF and have Bischoff and Hogan on the outs.
>
> But in all fairness, let's wait until
> >next weeks Nitro to see what Bischoff has to say, because if this
> >is a work he will debunk it just to spite McMahon!
If the stories are true and Hart does start in January I'm not certain
Bischoff would make an announcement now. I'd guess his "big" announcement
next Monday is going to about something else.
> h...@superlink.net (hfc) wrote:
>> If I was Vince or Eric, I would start
>>to take control of my respective company again. After all, if they
>>agreed to a "cease-fire" and basically come to terms that Hall and
>>Nash won't be hired back by the WWF untill their contact would have
>>expired (if they left) and that Hart and Micheals won't be hired by
>>WCW until their contracts expired (if they left) Hell, there are
>>enough "big names" around to make a company along with enough little
>>guys. If they took control, all this baby bullshit would disapear.
>>Either you play by the rules, or you don't play.
>>
>
> The kind of scenario you are describing would be an illegal
>collusion by management and a big time violation of anti-trust law.
>Now that's not to say that it couldn't happen since that was the
>basis of the old territorial system. It just wouldn't be legal, IMHO.
>
>Everett W.
Anti-trust laws? Hall, Nash, Hart, Micheals could work for another
orgranization other than the WWF or WCW, they could go to ECW or a
Japanese federation. I'm not a law expert, but isn't anti-trust
controlling the whole pie, the WCW and WWF are just two organizations.
Besides, imagine one of those four in an independent federation?
Lower pay would probably bring these guys back down to Earth.
The way this is moving, you might want to wait and hold your guffaws
until you actually SEE Hart on Nitro.
Who's laughing now chump?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------