"forgotten, but not gone."
Powrhug <pow...@sky.net> wrote in article <6462sa$3st$2...@alpha.sky.net>...
: Either-1. it was all an angle and both knew so they both acted
: pissed (you know, to make it look real, which is their job)
: 2. everyone is wrong, they don't hate each other-that's why Shawn
: looked pissed-because he didn't like the way it was handled
:
: or-my fave-it was an angle so they both acted pissed cause that
: WAS THE ANGLE, and-they aren't friends, they aren't enemies, they're
: just two guys who work together.
:
: Later,
: Kare
:
: http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/4839/powrhug.html
: Powrful Thoughts-A Woman's View of Professional Wrestling
It has to be angle if for no other reason than the cameras were correctly
placed so that we could see the dirty deed, as well as the 'stunned'
reaction, just like we were supposed to.
--
JoAnne
"MIPB 3:16: We just riffed your ass"
http://www.voicenet.com/~cybrmook
Actually tonight's angle sure screwed up some of the theories
running around the Net. Seems as though the same people who
assume that Bret and Shawn hate each other assume that Bret wasn't
in on the angle. So this brings to mind the following question.
Let's say these people are right. Shawn and Bret hate each other
and this was NOT an angle. Then why the hell would Shawn look
pissed? Wouldn't he be happy that Bret was screwed?