Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Marlena's Ass, and the RSPW Reaction

122 views
Skip to first unread message

Noel

unread,
Sep 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/17/97
to

After watching RAW, which I had taped a few days ago today I got quite
the shock in that ass-shot of Marlena. Now what was even more shocking
was the fact that only a few people in this place wrote about it! What
the hell is going on when a shot of what I assumed was bare ass (too
quick to tell) doesn't generate more discussion? Now don't give me any
holier then though B.S., there is nothing better to talk about. All
the speculation on what's going on in WWF and WCW is nothing but a
bunch of crap from people who don't really know what they're talking
about. Now people, I have opened the gates, discuss, put up pictures
(if you have them it'd be a damn boost for your webpage) Now talk
amongst yourselveses.

Was that bareassed? It had to be planned in a dress like that. Wowsa!!
And as for anyone who says it was in bad taste, lighten up! The poor
girl tried to hold her skirt down, it was that lousy Brian Pillman
that pulled it up! Wrestling is and should be adult oriented. I can't
wait to watch next weeks' edition NYPD RAW. Maybe ole Max Mini will
pull a Pillman on Sunny?


Joe Petrow

unread,
Sep 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/17/97
to

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Noel wrote:

> After watching RAW, which I had taped a few days ago today I got quite
> the shock in that ass-shot of Marlena. Now what was even more shocking
> was the fact that only a few people in this place wrote about it! What
> the hell is going on when a shot of what I assumed was bare ass (too
> quick to tell) doesn't generate more discussion? Now don't give me any
> holier then though B.S., there is nothing better to talk about.

Oh, c'mon, bareasses are nothing new in wrestling. The only way this
would have been truly newsworthy would be if she had "SCOOPS" written
across her cheeks. Would have been guaranteed a picture too...

Joe Petrow "Not the words that you wanted to hear
joe...@server.berkeley.edu Not the things that you wanted to see"
http://server.berkeley.edu/~joepet Genesis - "The Dividing Line"

Jonathan Snowden & Kristina Kendall

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

Noel wrote:
>
>
>
> After watching RAW, which I had taped a few days ago today I got quite
> the shock in that ass-shot of Marlena. Now what was even more shocking
> was the fact that only a few people in this place wrote about it! What
> the hell is going on when a shot of what I assumed was bare ass (too
> quick to tell) doesn't generate more discussion? Now don't give me any
> holier then though B.S., there is nothing better to talk about. All
> the speculation on what's going on in WWF and WCW is nothing but a
> bunch of crap from people who don't really know what they're talking
> about. Now people, I have opened the gates, discuss, put up pictures
> (if you have them it'd be a damn boost for your webpage) Now talk
> amongst yourselveses.
>
> Was that bareassed? It had to be planned in a dress like that. Wowsa!!
> And as for anyone who says it was in bad taste, lighten up! The poor
> girl tried to hold her skirt down, it was that lousy Brian Pillman
> that pulled it up! Wrestling is and should be adult oriented. I can't
> wait to watch next weeks' edition NYPD RAW. Maybe ole Max Mini will
> pull a Pillman on Sunny?
NICE ASS

Kid Hammer

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to


Noel wrote:

Hi,

I'm a reporter for a french wrestling site,
"Pour Fan de la WWF Seulement"
http://ireseau.com/usagers/joelm/

And I'm the one who does the Raw report (with tons of pics) every week!
So if you want to see marlena and her "but" go visit the site or go
directly to my report
http://ireseau.com/usagers/joelm/raw/raw.htm
I have a least one pic where you can see her lovely ass!Kid Hammer


Jeff D. Thostenson

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Joe Petrow wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Noel wrote:
>
> > After watching RAW, which I had taped a few days ago today I got quite
> > the shock in that ass-shot of Marlena. Now what was even more shocking
> > was the fact that only a few people in this place wrote about it! What
> > the hell is going on when a shot of what I assumed was bare ass (too
> > quick to tell) doesn't generate more discussion? Now don't give me any
> > holier then though B.S., there is nothing better to talk about.
>

> Oh, c'mon, bareasses are nothing new in wrestling. The only way this
> would have been truly newsworthy would be if she had "SCOOPS" written
> across her cheeks. Would have been guaranteed a picture too...

So has SCOOPThis! seen this message?????

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Thostenson

It's like watching soccer. It's mildly ammusing, but
most of the time you're just sitting there
thinking "Pick up the Ball!" -- Jon Stewart

http://www.mrs.umn.edu/~thostejd/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jesse Perez

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

Noel wrote:
>
>
>
> After watching RAW, which I had taped a few days ago today I got quite
> the shock in that ass-shot of Marlena. Now what was even more shocking
> was the fact that only a few people in this place wrote about it! What
> the hell is going on when a shot of what I assumed was bare ass (too
> quick to tell) doesn't generate more discussion? Now don't give me any
> holier then though B.S., there is nothing better to talk about. All
> the speculation on what's going on in WWF and WCW is nothing but a
> bunch of crap from people who don't really know what they're talking
> about. Now people, I have opened the gates, discuss, put up pictures
> (if you have them it'd be a damn boost for your webpage) Now talk
> amongst yourselveses.
>
> Was that bareassed? It had to be planned in a dress like that. Wowsa!!
> And as for anyone who says it was in bad taste, lighten up! The poor
> girl tried to hold her skirt down, it was that lousy Brian Pillman
> that pulled it up! Wrestling is and should be adult oriented. I can't
> wait to watch next weeks' edition NYPD RAW. Maybe ole Max Mini will
> pull a Pillman on Sunny?


She was probably wearing a thong

Noel

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

Asses - nothing new. Women's asses, something new and something we
need more of! Damnit! I'm putting a petition out, that we need some
ass every MNR.

As for it not being a big deal, give me a break. What the hell has
been a bigger deal? People are constantly asking for nudes of her, and
she goes and provides one for everybody.

ATMLaRiche

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

After reading this wonderfully Golden Newsgroup, I noticed that a lot has
been written about the rear end of Ms. Terri Runnels. I have a few things
to say.

Alright, to be blunt, I ain't straight. However, for Christ's sake, you
MEN, it's an ASS. It's no big deal! It's happened before, it'll happen
again. Who in the world cares about what she was wearing underneath (well,
besides the sexist pigs that have already brought up the subject)? Men (and
some ladies I'd imagine), get over it. It begins to get just a tid bit
annoying after a while.
RICHLY YOURS,
ATM LaRiche

Two time RSPWWCW Cruiserweight Champion

"And as always, the computer is infallible."
-Alexandra York

Take it or leave it. 2 Become 1.

RODOLFO NICHOLAS MARTINEZ

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

Well I was gonna write about it but I thought naw she's just wearing thin
black undies but after watching it over and over I think she was wearing
nothing/ Mc Mahon's gopne nuts! Couldn't raw be taken off the air for
that?
Oh well I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy it.

en4cer

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

In <19970918215...@ladder01.news.aol.com> atmla...@aol.com

(ATMLaRiche) writes:
>
>After reading this wonderfully Golden Newsgroup, I noticed that a lot
has
>been written about the rear end of Ms. Terri Runnels. I have a few
things
>to say.
>
>Alright, to be blunt, I ain't straight. However, for Christ's sake,
you
>MEN, it's an ASS. It's no big deal! It's happened before, it'll happen
>again. Who in the world cares about what she was wearing underneath
(well,
>besides the sexist pigs that have already brought up the subject)? Men
(and
>some ladies I'd imagine), get over it. It begins to get just a tid bit
>annoying after a while.
>RICHLY YOURS,
>ATM LaRiche

Tell ya what, why don't you post a picture of your ass and we'll see
what the BIG deal it is. Somehow I have the feeling that the photo will
be a little Am-BIG-U-Ass

Ken Luther

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

atmla...@aol.com (ATMLaRiche) wrote:

>Alright, to be blunt, I ain't straight. However, for Christ's sake, you
>MEN, it's an ASS.

Huh-huh-huh. You said "ass".

-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Ken Luther School of Public & Environmental Affairs |
|klu...@indiana.edu Indiana University |
|http://php.indiana.edu/~kluther/ |
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Rusty

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

Marlena showed that fine ass when she was attacked by Chyna!
Left me drooling!

>NICE ASS

RYAN

unread,
Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97
to

ATMLaRiche wrote:
>
> After reading this wonderfully Golden Newsgroup, I noticed that a lot has
> been written about the rear end of Ms. Terri Runnels. I have a few things
> to say.
>
> Alright, to be blunt, I ain't straight. However, for Christ's sake, you
> MEN, it's an ASS. It's no big deal! It's happened before, it'll happen
> again. Who in the world cares about what she was wearing underneath (well,
> besides the sexist pigs that have already brought up the subject)? Men (and
> some ladies I'd imagine), get over it. It begins to get just a tid bit
> annoying after a while.
> RICHLY YOURS,
> ATM LaRiche
>
> Two time RSPWWCW Cruiserweight Champion
>
> "And as always, the computer is infallible."
> -Alexandra York
>
> Take it or leave it. 2 Become 1.

Marlena's ass was not bare. She had a black g-string or t back on! Take
a look at the tape again you can clearly see that she didn't show her
bare ass.

Noel

unread,
Sep 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/19/97
to

Dear Fruity (joke settle down)

On 18 Sep 1997 21:50:41 GMT, atmla...@aol.com (ATMLaRiche) wrote:

>After reading this wonderfully Golden Newsgroup, I noticed that a lot has
>been written about the rear end of Ms. Terri Runnels. I have a few things
>to say.


>
>Alright, to be blunt, I ain't straight. However, for Christ's sake, you
>MEN, it's an ASS. It's no big deal! It's happened before, it'll happen
>again. Who in the world cares about what she was wearing underneath (well,
>besides the sexist pigs that have already brought up the subject)? Men (and
>some ladies I'd imagine), get over it. It begins to get just a tid bit
>annoying after a while.
>RICHLY YOURS,
>ATM LaRiche

Look possibly in the life you lead, asses might be the norm rather
then the exception, that of course is up to interpretation, but for a
prominent valet like Terry to show skin like that well ATM bra, that's
out of the ordinary. Now if you want to talk about sexist pigs, and
call me one for bringing it up, please do! I'm not sensitive and I'm
very hard to offend. So bring out the slop and gets' to steppin'.


Oh and if you want to talk about pigs, at least i didn't capitalize
the word 'ass' you heathen.

ATMLaRiche

unread,
Sep 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/20/97
to

While reading this Golden Newsgroup off of the Power Computer od Alexandra
York, I noticed that some corny-joke making guy named no...@niagara.com
(Noel) wrote the following on Fri, 19 Sep 1997:

<<Look possibly in the life you lead, asses might be the norm rather then
the exception, that of course is up to interpretation, but for a prominent
valet like Terry to show skin like that well ATM bra, that's out of the
ordinary.>>

I didn't say that is was out of the ordinary. I merely said that is HAS
happened before (look at the time she was attacked by Chyna), and I'm sure
that it will happen again. However, some people just tend to freak out when
things like this occur. It's almost like they've never seen a woman's rear
end before. Now that I think of it, half of the people that post things
like that probably never have. That's all I've got to say at press time.

RICHLY YOURS,
ATM LaRiche

Edward A Kruelski

unread,
Sep 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/23/97
to

RODOLFO NICHOLAS MARTINEZ (rmar...@julian.uwo.ca) wrote:
: Well I was gonna write about it but I thought naw she's just wearing thin

If you go back and look at the tape, she was wearing a pair of red panties, they were visible when she was going into the ring, though it must have been a thong.

BTW, a big fuck you to the ignorant homophobe who corrupted this happy little group with their reply to someone who stated that they weren't straight.

B0z0
Q.W.O.
Queer World Order


0 new messages